Genetically modified plants with enhanced resistance to...

Multicellular living organisms and unmodified parts thereof and – Method of introducing a polynucleotide molecule into or... – The polynucleotide confers pathogen or pest resistance

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C800S278000, C800S320000, C800S317000, C800S298000, C800S295000, C435S419000, C435S468000, C435S320100

Reexamination Certificate

active

06956147

ABSTRACT:
The present invention discloses genetically modified plants, such as potato plants. The plants are more resistant to a pathogen of interest following transformation of plant cells with a chimeric gene comprising a chitinase gene and β-1,3-glucanase gene. The invention also provides a method of enhancing the resistance of plants to pathogens by introducing a Brassica chitinase gene encoding two or more chitin-binding domains and β-1,3-glucanase gene and expressing the chitinase gene and β-1,3-glucanase gene.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5670706 (1997-09-01), Cornelissen et al.
patent: 5994625 (1999-11-01), Melchers
Abeles and Forrence, 1970, “Temporal and hormonal control of β-1,3-glucanase inPhaseolus vulgarisL.” Plant Physiol. 45:395-400.
Beintema, 1994, “Structural features of plant chitinases and chitin-binding proteins”, FEBS Lett. 350:159-163.
Berglund et al., 1995, “A proline-rich chitinase fromBeta vulgaris”, Plant Mol. Biol. 27:211-216.
Boller et al., 1983, “Chitinase in bean leaves: induction by ethylene, purification, properties, and possible function”, Planta 157:22-31.
Boller, 1985, “Induction of hydrolases as a defense reaction against pathogens”, In:Cellular and Molecular Biology of Plant Stress, J.L. Key and T. Kosuge (eds), Alan R. Liss, New York, pp 247-262.
Boller, 1992, “Biochemical analysis of chitinases and β-1,3-glucanases”, In:Molecular Plant Pathology vol. II, A Practical Approach, S. J. Gurr, M.J. Mcpherson and D. J. Bowles (eds), IRL press, Oxford. pp. 23-30.
Bradford, 1976, “A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quanities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding”, Anal. Biochem 72: 248-254.
Broglie et al., 1991, “Transgenic plants with enhanced resistance to the fungal pathogenRhizoctonia solani”, Science 254 1194-1197.
Broglie et al., 1986, “Ethylene-regulated gene expression: molecular cloning of the genes encoding an endochitinase fromPhaseolus vulgaris”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:6820-6824.
Broglie et al., 1984, “Light-regulated expression of a pea ribulose-1,5-biphosphate carboxylase small subunit gene in transformed plant cells”, Science 224:838-843.
Chrispeels and Raikhel, 1991, “Lectins, lectin genes, and their role in plant defense”, Plant Cell 3:1-9.
Chye and Cheung, 1995, “β-1,3-glucanase is highly-expressed in laticifers ofHevea brasiliensis”, Plant Mol. Biol. 29:397-402.
Dietze et al., 1995, “Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of potato (Solanum tuberosum)”, In:Gene Transfer to Plants, Potrykus and Spangenberg (eds),, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York, pp. 24-29.
Does et al., 1999, “Processing, targeting and antifungal activity of stinging nettle agglutinin in transgenic tobacco”, Plant Physiol. 120:421-431.
Fung, et al., 2002, “Tobacco-expressedBrassica junceachitinase BjCHI1 shows antifungal activity in vitro”, Plant Mol. Biol. 50:283-294.
Hamel and Bellemare, 1993, “Nucleotide sequence of aBrassica napusendochitinase gene”. Plant Physiol. 101:1403.
Iseli et al., 1993, “The N-terminal cysteine-rich domain of tobacco class 1 chitinase is essential for chitin binding but not for catalytic or antifungal activity”, Plant Physiol. 103:221-226.
Jach et al., 1995, “Enhanced quantitative resistance against fungal disease by combinatorial expression of different barley antifungal proteins in transgenic tobacco”, Plant J. 8:97-109.
Kush et al., 1990, “Laticifer-specific gene expression inHevea brasiliensis(rubber tree)”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:1787-1790.
Lasserre et al., 1996, “Structure and expression of three genes encoding ACC oxidase homologs from melon (Cucumis meloL.)”, Mol. Gen. Genet. 251:81-90.
Lerner and Raikhel, 1992, “The gene for stinging nettle lectin (Urtica dioicaagglutinin) encodes both a lectin and a chitinase”, J. Biol. Chem. 267:11085-11091.
Levorson and Chlan, 1997, “Plant chitinase consensus sequences”, Plant Mol. Biol. Reptr. 15:122-133.
Lin et al., 1995, “Genetic engineering of rice for resistance to sheath blight”, Bio/Technology 13:686-691.
Margis-Pinheiro et al., 1991, “Isolation of a complementary DNA encoding the bean PR4 chitinase: an acidic enzyme with an amino-terminus cysteine-rich domain”, Plant Mol. Biol. 17:243-253.
Mauch et al., 1988, “Antifungal hydrolases in pea tissue II. Inhibition of fungal growth by combinations of chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase”, Plant Physiol. 88:936-942.
Nagy et al., 1988, “Analysis of gene expression in transgenic plants”, In:Plant Molecular Biology Manual, Gelvin and Cshilperoort (eds), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. B4:11-13.
Payne et al., 1990, “Isolation of complementary DNA clones encoding pathogenesis-related proteins P and Q, two acidic chitinases from tobacco”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:98-102.
Peumans and Van Damme, 1995, “Lectins as plant defense proteins”, Plant Physiol. 109:347-352.
Pua et al., 1992, “Isolation and sequence analysis of a cDNA clone encoding ethylene-forming enzyme inBrassica juncea. (L.) Czern & Coss”, Plant Mol. Biol. 19:541-544.
Rasmussen et al., 1992, “Cloning and characterization of a pathogen-induced chitinase inBrassica napus”, Plant Mol. Biol. 20:277-287.
Samac et al., 1990, “Isolation and characterization of the genes encoding basic and acidic chitinase inArabidopsis thaliana”, Plant Physiol. 93:907-914.
Schlumbaum et al., 1986, “Plant chtinases are potent inhibitors of fungal growth”, Nature 324:365-367.
Shinshi et al., 1990, “Structure of a tobacco endochitinase gene: evidence that different chitinase genes can arise by transportation of sequences encoding a cysteine-rich domain”, Plant Mol. Biol. 14:357-368.
Van Parijs et al., 1991, “Hevein: an atifungal protein from rubber-tree (Hevea brasiliensis) latex”, Planta 183:258-264.
Verburg et al., 1992, “Identification of an essential tyrosine residue in the catalytic site of a chitinase isolated fromZea maysthat is selectively modified during inactivation with 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide”, J. Biol. Chem. 267:3886-3893.
Verburg and Huynh, 1991, “Purification and Characterization of an antifungal chitinase fromArabidopsis thaliana”, Plant Physiol. 95:450-455.
Ward et al., 1989, “Binding activities of a repertoire of single immunoglobulin variable domains secreted fromEscherichia coli” Nature 341:544-546.
Wirth and Wolf. 1990, “Dye-labelled substrates for the assay and detection of chitinase and lysozyme activity”, J. Microbiol. Meth. 12:197-205.
Yanisch-Perron et al., 1985, “Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors”, Gene 33:103-119.
Zhao and Chye, 1999, “Methyl jasmonate induces expression of a novelBrassica junceachitinase with two chitin-binding domains”, Plant Mol. Biol. 40:1009-1018.
Zhu et al., 1994, “Enhanced protection against fungal attack by constitutive co-expression of chitinase and glucanase genes in transgenic tobacco”, Bio/Technology 12:807-812.
Benhamou et al., Antifungal effect of bean endochitinase on Rhizoctonia solani: ultrastructural changes and cytochemical aspects of chitin breakdown. Can J Microbiol. Mar. 1993;39(3):318-28.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Genetically modified plants with enhanced resistance to... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Genetically modified plants with enhanced resistance to..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Genetically modified plants with enhanced resistance to... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3481796

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.