Mineral oils: processes and products – Chemical conversion of hydrocarbons – Cracking
Reexamination Certificate
2001-04-13
2003-10-21
Griffin, Walter D. (Department: 1764)
Mineral oils: processes and products
Chemical conversion of hydrocarbons
Cracking
C208S113000, C208S120050, C208S120100, C208S120150, C208S120200, C208S120250, C208S120350, C502S061000, C502S064000, C502S065000, C502S066000, C502S079000, C502S300000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06635168
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to an improved catalyst composition useful in fluid catalytic cracking processes. The present catalyst composition is capable of reducing sulfur compounds normally found as part of the gasoline fraction streams of such processes. The present invention is further directed to an improved fluid catalytic cracking process which uses the subject catalyst composition and provides product streams of light and heavy gasoline fractions with substantially lower sulfur-containing compounds.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Catalytic cracking is a petroleum refining process which is applied commercially on a very large scale. A large amount of the refinery gasoline blending pool in the United States is produced using a fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) process. In the process, heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks are converted into lighter products by reactions taking place at elevated temperatures in the presence of a catalyst, with the majority taking place in the vapor phase. The feedstock is thereby converted into gasoline, distillates and other liquid fraction product streams as well as lighter gaseous cracking products having four or less carbon atoms per molecule. The three characteristic steps of a catalytic cracking process comprises: a cracking step in which the heavy hydrocarbon feed stream is converted into lighter products, a stripping step to remove adsorbed hydrocarbons from the catalyst material, and a regeneration step to burn off coke formations from the catalyst material. The regenerated catalyst is then recirculated and reused in the cracking step.
Catalytic cracking feedstocks normally contain organic sulfur compounds, such as mercaptans, sulfides and thiophenes as well as other sulfur containing species. The products of the cracking process correspondingly tend to contain sulfur impurities even though about half of the sulfur compounds are converted to hydrogen sulfide during the cracking process, mainly by catalytic decomposition of non-thiophenic sulfur compounds. The thiophenic compounds have been found to be most difficult to remove. The specific distribution of sulfur in the cracking products is dependent on a number of factors including feed, catalyst type, additives present, conversion and other operating conditions, but, in any event a certain proportion of the sulfur tends to enter the light or heavy gasoline fractions and passes over into the product pool. Although petroleum feedstock normally contains a variety of sulfur born contaminants, one of the chief concerns is the presence of unsubstituted and hydrocarbyl substituted thiophenes and its derivatives, such as thiophene, methylthiophene, ethylthiophene, propylthiophene, tetrahydrothiophene, benzothiophene and the like in the heavy and light gasoline fraction product streams of FCC processes. The thiophenic compounds generally have boiling points within the range of the light and heavy gasoline fractions and, thus, become concentrated in these product streams. With increasing environmental regulation being applied to petroleum products, for example in the Reformulated Gasoline (RFG) regulations, there has been numerous attempts to reduce the sulfur content of the products, especially those attributable to thiophenic compounds.
One approach has been to remove the sulfur from the FCC feed by hydrotreating before cracking is initiated. While highly effective, this approach tends to be expensive in terms of the capital cost of the equipment as well as operationally since hydrogen consumption is high. Another approach has been to remove the sulfur from the cracked products by hydrotreating. Again, while effective, this solution has the drawback that valuable product octane may be lost when the high octane olefinic components become saturated.
From the economic point of view, it would be desirable to achieve thiophenic sulfur removal in the cracking process itself since this would effectively desulfurize the major components of the gasoline blending pool without additional treatment. Various catalytic materials have been developed for the removal of sulfur during the FCC process cycle. For example, an FCC catalyst impregnated with vanadium and nickel metal has been shown to reduce the level of product sulfur (See Myrstad et al.,
Effect of Nickel and Vanadium on Sulfur Reduction of FCC Naptha,
Applied Catalyst A: General 192 (2000) pages 299-305). This reference also showed that a sulfur reduction additive based on a zinc impregnated alumina is effective to reduce product sulfur in FCC products. However, when mixed with a metal impregnated FCC catalyst, the effect of the sulfur reduction additive was inhibited.
Other developments for reducing product sulfur have centered on the removal of sulfur from the regenerator stack gases. An early approach developed by Chevron used alumina compounds as additives to the inventory of cracking catalyst to adsorb sulfur oxides in the FCC regenerator; the adsorbed sulfur compounds which entered the process in the feed were released as hydrogen sulfide during the cracking portion of the cycle and passed to the product recovery section of the unit where they were removed (See Krishna et al.,
Additives Improved FCC Process,
Hydrocarbon Processing, November 1991, pages 59-66). Although sulfur is removed from the stack gases of the regenerator, product sulfur levels are not greatly affected, if at all.
An alternative technology for the removal of sulfur oxides from regenerator stack gases is based on the use of magnesium-aluminum spinels as additives to the circulating catalyst inventory in the FCC unit. Exemplary patents disclosing this type of sulfur removal additives include U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,963,520; 4,957,892; 4,957,718; 4,790,982 an others. Again, however, sulfur content in liquid products, such as gasoline, was not greatly affected.
A catalyst composition to reduce sulfur levels in liquid cracking products has been described by Wormsbecher and Kim in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,376,608 and 5,525,210, which teachings are incorporated in their entirety by reference. The reference proposes the addition of low amounts of an additive composed of an alumina-supported Lewis acid to conventional zeolite containing cracking catalyst. Although this system has the advantages of causing sulfur reduction in the cracking process, it is generally believed that use of greater than about 10 weight percent of the described additives in their composition does not provide a benefit (e.g. high sulfur removal while retaining the selectivity of other products) proprtional to the level of the additive. In view of the fact that an FCCU can only contain a fixed amount of fluidized particulates, the inclusion of additives, such as the alumina-supported Lewis acid additives of Wormsbecher and Kim, causes a reduction in the amount of the base cracking catalyst contained in the FCCU and, thus, a proportional reduction in the conversion of heavy feedstock to desired products.
It would be desirable to have a catalyst composition suitable for use in FCC processes wherein the catalyst is capable of significantly reducing the level of thiophenes and their derivatives from light and heavy gasoline fractions while substantially retaining conversion of feedstock to desired product.
It would further be desirable to have a catalyst suitable for use in FCC processes wherein the catalyst is capable of performing the reduction of the levels of thiophene and its derivatives as part of the functions of the process conducted in an FCCU.
It would still further be desirable to have a catalyst suitable for use in FCC processes wherein the catalyst is capable of substantially reducing the levels of thiophene and its derivatives as part of the functions of the FCC process while substantially maintaining the overall cracking activity and product selectivities.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3293192 (1966-12-01), Maher et al.
patent: 3402996 (1968-09-01), Maher et al.
patent: 3607043 (1971-09-01), McDaniel et al.
patent: 3676368 (1972-07-01), Scherzer et al.
patent: 3957689 (1976-05-01), Ostermaier e
Cheng Wu-Cheng
Deitz Pilip Stephen
Rudesill John Allen
Wormsbecher Richard Franklin
Zhao Xinjin
Cross Charles A.
Griffin Walter D.
Troffkin Howard J.
W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn
LandOfFree
Gasoline sulfur reduction catalyst for fluid catalytic... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Gasoline sulfur reduction catalyst for fluid catalytic..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Gasoline sulfur reduction catalyst for fluid catalytic... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3129764