Gas performance control system for gas discharge lasers

Coherent light generators – Particular active media – Gas

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C372S009000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06563853

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for stabilizing output beam parameters of a gas discharge laser. More particularly, the present invention relates to maintaining an optimal gas mixture composition by performing gas replenishment based on a monitored amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) signal which varies with the gas mixture status.
2. Discussion of the Related Art
Pulsed gas discharge lasers such as excimer and molecular lasers emitting in the deep ultraviolet (DUV) or vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) have become very important for industrial applications such as photolithography. Such lasers generally include a discharge chamber containing two or more gases such as a halogen and one or two rare gases. KrF (248 nm), ArF (193 nm), XeF (350 nm), KrCl (222 nm), XeCl (308 nm), and F
2
(157 nm) lasers are examples.
The efficiencies of excitation of the gas mixtures and various parameters of the output beams of these lasers vary sensitively with the compositions of their gas mixtures. An optimal gas mixture composition for a KrF laser has preferred gas mixture component ratios around 0.1% F
2
/1% Kr/98.9% Ne. An F
2
laser has a preferred gas component ratio around 0.1% F
2
/99.9% Ne (or He, or combination thereof) (see U.S. Pat. No. 6,157,662, which is hereby incorporated by reference). Any deviation from these optimum gas compositions or those for other excimer or molecular lasers would typically result in instabilities or reductions from optimal of one or more output beam parameters such as beam energy, energy stability, temporal pulse width, temporal and spatial coherence, bandwidth, and long and short axial beam profiles and divergences.
Especially important in this regard is the concentration (or partial pressure) of the halogen containing molecules, e.g., F
2
or HCl, in the gas mixture. The depletion of the rare gases, e.g., Kr and Ne for a KrF laser, is low in comparison to that for the F
2
, although these rare gases are also replenished at longer intervals.
In industrial applications, it is advantageous to have an excimer or molecular laser capable of operating continuously for long periods of time, i.e., having minimal downtime. It is desired to have an excimer or molecular laser capable of running non-stop year round, or at least having a minimal number and duration of down time periods for scheduled maintenance, while maintaining constant output beam parameters. Uptimes of, e.g., greater than 98% require precise control and stabilization of output beam parameters, which in turn require precise control of the composition of the gas mixture.
Unfortunately, halogen depletion due to electrode erosion occurs in excimer and molecular lasers due to the aggressive nature of the fluorine or chlorine in the gas mixture. The halogen gas is highly reactive and its concentration in the gas mixture decreases as it reacts, leaving traces of contaminants. The halogen gas reacts with materials of the discharge chamber or tube. Moreover, the reactions take place and the gas mixture degrades whether the laser is operating (discharging) or not. The static gas lifetime is about one week for a typical KrF-laser. For a static KrF laser gas mixture, i.e., with no discharge running, increases in the concentrations of HF, O
2
, CO
2
and SiF
4
have been observed (see Jurisch et al., above). During operation of a KrF-excimer laser, such contaminants as HF, CF
4
, COF
2
, SiF
4
have been observed to increase in concentration rapidly (see G. M. Jursich et al.,
Gas Contaminant Effects in Discharge-Excited KrF Lasers,
Applied Optics, Vol. 31, No. 12, pp. 1975-1981 (Apr. 20, 1992)).
One way to effectively reduce this gas degradation is by reducing or eliminating contamination sources within the laser discharge chamber. With this in mind, an all metal, ceramic laser tube has been disclosed (see D. Basting et al., Laserrohr für halogenhaltige Gasentladungslaser” G 295 20 280.1, Jan. 25, 1995/Apr. 18, 1996 (disclosing the Lambda Physik LP Novatube); and German Gebrauchsmuster DE 297 13 755.7 of Lambda Physik (disclosing an excimer or molecular laser having a window mount with a metal ceiling), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference). Gas purification systems, such as cryogenic gas filters (see U.S. Pat. No. 4,534,034) or electrostatic particle filters (see U.S. Pat. No. 5,586,134) are also being used to extend KrF laser gas lifetimes to 100 million shots before a new fill is advisable.
Notwithstanding using improved laser tubes and cryogenic purification systems, the most important techniques for stabilizing gas mixtures include gas replenishment procedures, whereby halogen injections (HI), rare gas injections, partial gas replacements (PGR) and total pressure adjustments are performed. The specific gas replenishment amounts and intervals are determined based on this evolution of the composition of the gas mixture, which is most prominently determined by depletion of the halogen species. U.S. provisional patent application no. 60/124,785 discloses the preferred gas replenishment procedure of the present invention and is hereby incorporated by reference. The '785 provisional application discloses to use several small gas actions such as micro-halogen injections (_HI) and mini-gas replacements (MGR
i
) which are gas replacement procedures performed at multiple carefully selected intervals and amounts, in addition to total pressure adjustments, partial gas replacements (PGR) and new fills.
It is not easy, however, to directly measure the halogen concentration within the laser tube for making rapid online adjustments (see U.S. Patent No. 5,149,659 (disclosing monitoring chemical reactions in the gas mixture) and Japanese Patent No. JP 10341050 (disclosing a method wherein optical detection of a halogen specific emission is performed)). Therefore, advantageous methods applicable to industrial laser systems include using a known relationship between F
2
or HCl concentration and a laser parameter. In such a method, precise values of the parameter would be directly measured, and the F
2
or HCl concentration would be calculated from those values. In this way, the F
2
concentration may be indirectly monitored.
Previously described methods for laser gas characterization include measuring the spectral width of the laser emission (see U.S. Pat. No. 5,450,436 to Mizoguchi et al.), measuring the spatial beam profile of the laser emission (see U.S. Pat. No. 5,642,374 to Wakabayashi et al.) and measuring other characteristics of the output beam such as bandwidth, coherence, driving voltage or energy stability wherein a rough estimation of the status of the gas mixture may be made (see U.S. Pat. No. 5,440,578 to Sandstrom, U.S. Pat. No. 5,887,014 to Das and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/379,034, which is assigned to the same assignee, each patent and patent application being hereby incorporated by reference).
In the Vogler Application (09/379,034), a data set of an output parameter such as pulse energy and input parameter such as driving voltage is measured and compared to a stored “master” data set corresponding to an optimal gas composition such as is present in the discharge chamber after a new fill. From a comparison of the data values and/or the slopes of curves generated from the data sets, a present gas mixture status and appropriate gas replenishment procedures, if any, are determined and undertaken to reoptimize the gas mixture.
It is desired to improve upon all of the above-described techniques by performing gas control based on the monitored values of a parameter that varies with a known correspondence with the halogen content in the gas mixture. Moreover, the desired parameter would not be greatly influenced by other laser system and output beam parameters, such as resonator alignment, repetition rate, tuning accuracy, thermal conditions, aging of the laser tube and degradation of optics.
Another technique uses a mass spectrometer for precision analysis of the gas mixture composition (see U.S. Pat. No. 5,09

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Gas performance control system for gas discharge lasers does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Gas performance control system for gas discharge lasers, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Gas performance control system for gas discharge lasers will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3051877

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.