Gas separation: processes – With control responsive to sensed condition
Reexamination Certificate
2002-09-25
2004-09-14
Smith, Duane S. (Department: 1724)
Gas separation: processes
With control responsive to sensed condition
C095S155000, C095S242000, C073S060110, C096S156000, C096S176000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06790256
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to oil producing operations, and more particularly to a system and a method for monitoring and controlling foam or hydrocarbon carry-under at a wellsite.
2. Background of the Invention
Oil, also referred to herein interchangeably as crude oil, condensate, or formation fluid, in essentially all reservoirs contains at least some dissolved gases, which exist naturally in the formation. When oil flows upward from the formation through the wellbore(s) to the wellhead, there is a substantial decrease in the pressure because the platform equipment is set up to reduce the high reservoir pressure to a pressure that can be handled by a pipeline system or other downstream equipment. As a result of this drop in system pressure, some of the dissolved gases tend to evolve and become physically separated from the oil to form gas bubbles, i.e. foams.
Although the amount of gases originally dissolved in the formation fluid may not be very large, the effect of lower pressure on their separation can be quite substantial. This is because the same weight of a gas occupies a much larger volume than the corresponding liquid. Depending on the molecular weight, temperature and other conditions, it is not unusual for a small amount of liquid to transform into gas with 100 times or even higher volume. Examples of commonly encountered and naturally occurring gases in formation fluid include, but are not limited to, methane, ethane, carbon dioxide and mixtures.
There is typically a train of several liquid and gas separators installed at a wellsite to separate gases from the formation fluid before it is transported for further processing. The formation fluid itself is may actually be a multiphase liquid having gas and both an aqueous phase and a hydrocarbon phase, commonly referred to as crude oil. In an ideal situation, the evolved gases and formation fluid should separate relatively fast because they are in separate phases and the gas phase bubbles should break out of the fluid phase readily. For a number of reasons, however, the formation fluid-gas separation and even the crude oil-gas separation in practice is usually difficult and incomplete. The main reason is that the gas bubbles in the oil (also referred to as emulsions or foams) are too stable to be effectively broken up at a high oil production rate even with several gas-oil separators because the residence time of the liquid in each separator is kept relatively short. In view of the fact that the industry trend is to have even higher production rate from a producing well, i.e even shorter residence times in the separators, and drilling into formations in deeper water, the problem with foaming may become even more severe. While it is certainly possible to build and use larger gas-oil separators, this option may not be desirable or practical because such separators would require much higher capital investments and more space on oilfield platforms.
Foaming is undesirable because it is usually an unpredictable and metastable phenomenon, which may interfere with the gas-oil separation efficiency or the operations of the oil well(s); the resultant carryover of liquid in the form of either foam or mist/droplets of oil entrained in the gas stream exiting the gas-oil separators will enter into downstream equipment or pipeline. Too much of such liquid carryover can cause severe operating problems, such as flooding for the downstream gas transportation equipment, pipeline or gas processing plants.
Similarly, entrainment of gas in the liquid stream from the separators, hereinafter referred to as gas carry-under, can be very undesirable as well. The gases entrained in the liquid stream can cause both processing and safety problems. For example, such gas can cause over pressuring of vessels downstream from the separators. The gas can be in the form of entrained gas bubbles or it can be in the form of dissolved gasses. In either case, the result of such entrained gas can be its unexpected evolution at a point in the process where it can not be well handled from a safety perspective, environmental perspective, an operating perspective, or a combination of one or more of these. In addition to this, where the main objective is the production of crude oil, incorporation of gas into the crude oil decreases the efficiency with which the crude oil can be transported because the gas is taking up space (volume) thereby decreasing the volume of crude oil being transported. Where the primary objective is the production of natural gas, the loss of gas into the crude oil or aqueous streams exiting a separator is undesirable.
One reason for the existence of stable foam, thus the foaming and gas carry-under problem, is that many surfactants exist naturally in or near the producing formations. Such surfactants, with their ability to stabilize emulsions or foams, cause the foaming and gas carry-under problem to become more pronounced and longer lasting, particularly when the formation fluid reaches the production facilities at the wellhead on the surface as noted above. Moreover, many chemicals or additives are injected into oil wells by the operator to provide functions such as corrosion inhibition, asphaltenes suppression, etc. and may also act as surfactants under the producing conditions to further stabilize the emulsions, thus exacerbating the foaming and gas carry-under problem.
Another factor affecting gas carry-under occurs when the formation fluid flows from the producing formation toward the wellbores of the producing wells. The flow rate near the wellbores becomes higher than that in other parts of the reservoir. This higher flow rate tends to cause the formation fluid to trap and mix with any water that may be in the vicinity of the wellbore, or any steam that is injected into the wellbore by the operator. In the presence of either natural or injected chemicals behaving as a surfactant, this type of oil-water emulsion also can further intensify the gas carry-under problem at or down stream from the wellhead.
In typical land or offshore oil production wells, the formation fluid from the wellbores flows through a wellhead choke into a high-pressure manifold, which is used if there are multiple wells at a particular site. The fluid then passes through one or more heat exchangers to recover useable heat into a high-pressure (HP) gas-oil separator. There are usually several separators—a train of separators—for one oil-processing platform. The primary functions of these separators are to separate the gas and liquid components of the oil and to reduce the pressure in a stepwise manner. Such a train of separators commonly comprises a HP separator, an intermediate pressure (IP) separator, a low-pressure (LP) separator, and a test separator, with the HP separator being closest to the wellhead choke and having the largest pressure drop. In order to conserve energy by not having to repressurize, it is preferred to separate gas from oil at as high a pressure as possible.
The gas phase of the production fluid rapidly expands downstream of the wellhead choke, and continues to expand further downstream through pressure control valves as the fluid travels through the train of gas-oil separators. Any natural surfactants or other additives injected into the well that can act as surfactants tend to create a gas carry-under problem.
It is therefore desirable to have a reliable system to determine the extent of gas carry-under of the formation fluid recovered through a wellbore at the wellsite. It is also desirable to use the obtained gas carry-under information to control gas carry-under at the wellsite. The present invention addresses the above-noted needs and provides a wellsite foam monitoring and controlling system that (a) determines the extent of foam carry-under, (b) determines the extent of the treatment required to alleviate the gas carry-under problem, and (c) controls the dispensing of additives to inhibit or alleviate the gas carry-under problem.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present inve
Baker Hughes Incorporated
Madan Mossman & Sriram P.C.
Smith Duane S.
LandOfFree
Gas carry-under monitoring and control system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Gas carry-under monitoring and control system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Gas carry-under monitoring and control system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3198955