Radiant energy – Invisible radiant energy responsive electric signalling – Semiconductor system
Reexamination Certificate
2001-07-30
2004-07-20
Hannaher, Constantine (Department: 2878)
Radiant energy
Invisible radiant energy responsive electric signalling
Semiconductor system
C250S370010, C250S370080
Reexamination Certificate
active
06765213
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to the field of gamma-ray detectors, and especially gamma-ray detectors using the method of coincidence detection of positron emission for nuclear medical imaging.
BACKGROUND
Coincidence detection methods for positron emission, also known as electronic collimation, is used in the field of nuclear medical imaging. In this method isotopes that emit positrons are injected into the body of the examined patient. Each of the emitted positrons annihilates with an electron to produce a pair of 511 Kev photons propagating along the same line but in opposite directions and out of the patient's body. The 511 Kev photons are detected by a camera which has two separate detector heads, which determine the position where the photons interact with the detector heads and the energy of these interacting photons.
Only pairs of photons with both of their measured energies within the predetermined energy range 511+/−&Dgr;E Kev are suitable for composing the image. The positions of interaction of these photons in the plane of the two separate detector heads define a line, which passes through the location of the point of origin of the electron-positron emission in the patient's body. By deriving these lines from the useful photons measured, an image can be constructed from the calculated positions of origin of the pairs.
Photons with measured energy of 511+/−&Dgr;E Kev are used for acquiring the image, where &Dgr;E is a predetermined energy range, which depends, among other factors, on the energy resolution of the camera and on the quality of the desired image. Photons with measured energy outside of the range of 511+/−&Dgr;E Kev are probably photons that lost part of their energy by a scattering process in the patient body known as Compton scattering. Compton scattering changes the path of photons from the original orientation in which they were emitted by the annihilation process. Accordingly, photons that have undergone Compton scattering are not suitable for image acquisition, and the image-processing unit of the camera thus ignores them.
Photons of the same pair are emitted simultaneously. Accordingly, the detection time of one photon of a pair should differ from the detection time of the second photon, only by a very small time interval &Dgr;t which depends, among other factors, on the time resolution of the system, and on the different time of flight of each photon to its corresponding detector head.
The rate of the measured events in the detector heads determines the average time &Dgr;T between two followings events. Two photons are considered as being related to the same pair when they are detected by the two detector heads of the camera within a time difference &Dgr;t, which satisfies the condition &Dgr;t<&Dgr;T.
Accordingly, measuring the detection times of the photons by the detector heads implies that two photons (one in each head) are related to the same pair, when &Dgr;t<&Dgr;T.
For more accurate imaging, the exact location of the electron-positron emission point on the above-derived lines, can be found from the calculations of the time of flight &Dgr;t
1
and &Dgr;t
2
of the photons, from their emission sites to the two detector heads.
In a typical coincidence method &Dgr;t is approximately 10 nanoseconds. This means that the time-resolving capability of the camera in measuring the interaction time of the photons with the detector heads should also be better than 10 nanoseconds.
In Anger cameras in which the photon detection is done by a combination of scintillator and photomultipliers, a time resolution of 10 nanoseconds is achieved on a regular basis.
In a pixellated solid-state detector array, the rise-time of the signal in the pixellated anodes depends on the weighting potential (commonly known as the “small pixel effect”), as described in the article entitled “Signals induced in semiconductor gamma-ray imaging detectors” by J. D. Eskin et al., published in Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 85, pp. 647ff. (1999), hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference. The weighting potential depends mainly on the ratio between the dimensions of the anodes and the detector thickness. For example, in a typical pixellated solid-state detector, made of CdZnTe and designed for coincidence method use, the above-mentioned ratio is about 1/4 (2.5 mm anode size in a 10 mm detector thickness). In this situation the interaction time measured by the anodes depends strongly on the depth of interaction in the semiconductor. As a consequence, the anodes would measure two different events that occur simultaneously but at different depth of interaction, as if they occurred at different times. For the specific example of the detector mentioned above, the error in measuring the time of interaction by the anodes, can be as large as 1 microsecond.
An error of 1 microsecond in measuring the time of interaction is totally unacceptable for a coincidence measurement method, where the measurement should have a time resolution of 5 nanosecond.
An alternative technique for using the coincidence method with pixellated semiconductor detectors is to derive the time of interaction from the signal produced by the cathode of the detector head. The cathode is very big in comparison to the pixellated anodes and thus the small pixel effect in this case is negligible. The signal produced by the cathode is effectively instant and the time of interaction measured by this signal is thus independent of the depth of interaction.
However, the use of the detector head cathode for measuring the time of interactions introduces two major problems:
1. The large cathode suffers from a large dark current that produces a high noise level. The high level of noise in the cathode may cause a significant error in measuring the time of interaction.
2. Even though the time of coincidence is measured accurately using the cathode signals, there is still a problem of how to define the correct anodes to which the coincident signals belong. Anodes detecting two events that may occur up to 1 microsecond apart, may detect these events as occurring at inaccurate times and even in the reverse order to their true occurrence, because of the interaction depth delay.
There therefore exists a serious need for a device and method for deriving a low noise signal by which the interaction time of a photon with a pixellated semiconductor detector head can be accurately measured independently of the depth of interaction. At the same time, the device and method should be capable of determining to which one of the signals of the pixellated anodes of the semiconductor detector each coincidence signal is related.
The disclosures of each of the publications mentioned in this section and in other sections of the specification, are hereby incorporated by reference, each in its entirety.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention seeks to provide a new gamma ray detector which has a sufficiently fast response time for any impacting photon that it is able to detect coincidence events accurately, and which is capable of identifying the correct pixellated anodes in the camera heads to which the coincidence events are related, and which also operates at a low dark current noise level.
According to one preferred embodiment of the present invention, this objective is achieved by means of a detector array having segmented cathodes, the area of each segment being large enough not to engender small pixel effects which would slow down the time of response of the cathode, and having pixellated anodes of the dimensions required to provide the desired resolution of the detector array. The segmented cathodes provide a fast coincidence signal, including the location address of the cathodes impacted by the coincident photons, and this coincidence signal is used to read the charge signals detected only on those pixellated anodes located behind the cathodes providing the coincidence signal. Each cathode area is sufficiently small, on the other hand, that there is very low likelihood of hav
El-Hanany Uri
Halberthal Eldan
Klier Shimon
Shahar Arie
Tsigelman Alex
Darby & Darby
Hannaher Constantine
Imarad Imaging Systems Ltd.
Moran Timothy
LandOfFree
Gamma-ray detector for coincidence detection does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Gamma-ray detector for coincidence detection, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Gamma-ray detector for coincidence detection will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3207836