Game racket including a string suspension system

Games using tangible projectile – Player held and powered – nonmechanical projector – per se,... – Racket or paddle; accessory therefor

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C473S521000, C473S522000, C473S539000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06503161

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a game racket, in particular to a racket having a string suspension system.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Contemporary game rackets such as those used for playing tennis, typically are made of lightweight high strength composite materials such as graphite, super graphite, and titanium to name a few. Some of the most advanced rackets are as light as seven ounces. The superior strength to weight ratio of these space age materials has made it possible to enhance the hitting quality of rackets significantly.
Rackets today have larger “sweet spots”.In other words, the area of optimum response on the stringed surface is larger than those used previously. Contemporary rackets have been made stiffer and more powerful than ever before. Power has been increased further by making the rackets bigger and longer and yet they remain lighter than ever. Unwanted vibration and shock common to typical racket construction, is being dampened and attenuated by a number of partially successful means.
Yet in spite of the many improvements offered by innovations over the years, a vast majority have been limited by the inherent nature of the standard stringing system. As defined in Bothwell—U.S. Pat. No. 5,458,331 a major drawback common to previous racket improvements is a “fixed node” stringing system. In the fixed node system the string is laced and/or secured directly to the frame and is partially responsible for the limited size of the sweet spot and the lack of rebound near the edges of the stringed surface. The fixed node configuration is also responsible for direct transfer from the string to the frame of undesirable vibrations and shock from ball impact. Consequently, any attempt to enhance the sweet spot or to improve shock attenuation in a conventional racket is limited by the nature of this stringing system. Fixed node stringing has remained primarily an assumed standard in the history of racket design and construction.
Many reasonable improvements of the fixed node type racket can be found. In U.S. Pat. No. 3,999,756 (by Head) the area of the optimum response on the strings simply is increased by making the stringed surface itself bigger. In U.S. Pat. No. 4,165,071 Frolow improves the sweet spot by modifying the balance and swing weight of the frame. Both however are of the fixed node type and are limited in scope as such.
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,332,213, Klose increases the maximum elastic response of the stringed surface with enlarged string holes which permit the string to move more freely about its fixed node. In U.S. Pat. No. 5,419,963, Kuebler describes a string with a gradually decreasing diameter from its fixed node at the frame to the center of the stringed surface. The thinner middle portion of the string increases its maximum elastic length to improve the sweet spot.
Since the abandonment of wood rackets, shock attenuation has been a major issue in racket design. An inherent inability of graphite composites to attenuate shock in contemporary rackets is aggravated by both the “eggshell” like construction of the new super light frames and the ill effects of fixed node stringing. The hitting quality is akin to something made of tin. In fact most rackets currently under 9 ounces have vibration damping handle designs to dampen shock and to add a solid feel to the hollow hitting quality.
Although most shock attenuation methods rely on a post reaction approach, whereby impact shock in the frame is assumed to be a pre-existing condition, there are some that have relied on a pre-reaction approach. A pre-reaction approach does not assume that shock is a pre-existing condition. It attempt to attenuate shock prior to its transfer from the striking surface to the frame.
An early example of this is illustrated by Ryder—U.S. Pat. No. 1,558,507. The stringed surface of the Ryder racket is attached directly to a pneumatic tube which defines its perimeter about the head. By joining the strings with the tube, isolation of the stringed surface from the frame is achieved. Ryder proposes to enhance the liveliness of the strings by securing the tube to the frame with springs. By today's design standards, the racket of Ryder is inefficient and its array of fittings is complicated and difficult to employ practically.
Another pre-reaction method of shock attenuation and performance enhancement is described in Haythornwaite—U.S. Pat. No. 4,613,138 where a ductile connection between the string and frame is provided by a flexible membrane. As in Ryder, the strings are attached to the membrane with mechanical loops. Manipulation of the tensile state of the membrane, alters its “spring energy” and therefore its elastic response and that of the strings. Though the idea is sound the achievement is marred by the mechanical spring assembly located in its handle and the difficulty of its integration with existing racket conventions and methods of fabrication.
Another effort to improve upon fixed node stringing with a pre-reaction approach to racket performance enhancement exists in the form of Maynard—U.S. Pat. No. 4,772,021. Maynard provides a ductile connection of the entire string-bed to the head by means of an inflatable rubber tube. The isolated string-bed offers dramatically reduced shock transfer and improved response of the stringed surface. Its inner frame of the fixed node type however, requires a redundant structure, making the racket heavy, unwieldy and difficult to integrate with current racket conventions. An approach similar to Maynard is Lanctot—U.S. Pat. No. 5,197,732 in which a stringed hoop of the fixed node type is isolated from the frame and held in place by a fluid matter. Some of the best qualities of string isolation are attained, but the redundant structure and the density of the fluid matter required make the racket too heavy.
A most effective pre-reaction solution to fixed node stringing is described by Bothwell—U.S. Pat. No. 5,458,331 in which the woven string-bed of the racket is isolated from the frame by air cushions and is referred to as suspended node stringing. The redundant structure of Maynard is avoided in Bothwell by allowing the tensile load of the string loop carriers to bear on outer facing surface of the cushions. The ductile connection of the strings and frame afforded by the suspension system of Bothwell, improves the area and responsiveness of the sweet spot. Suspended node stringing is unique in its ability to be adapted to accepted racket conventions and methods of manufacture. It represents a fully integrated attenuation method that isolates impact shock at the string bearing point before its transfer to the frame.
The preferred embodiment of this suspension system for a game racket offers most of the performance enhancements of U.S. Pat. No. 5,458,331 but in a simplified manner that is easier to produce. In this version, an isolating gasket is used to isolate the stringed surface from the frame. The resulting string suspension system has all of the qualities of suspended node stringing as defined by Bothwell, but without the inherent difficulty of a fluid tight system.
The ductile connection of the string to the frame in the present invention results in an increase in area of the sweet spot. The degree of enhanced string responsiveness is a function of the physical characteristics of the isolating matter. A compressible matter will decrease the rebound differential from the strings midpoint to its end, making the string more responsive nearer the edge of the stringed surface. In the suspended node configuration, the resiliency of the isolating matter serves to propel the ball with accelerating velocity as it leaves the strings and the compressibility of the matter determines the degree of improved elastic response and dwell time of the ball on the strings. This ability of the suspension system to provide “hold” on the ball, is a dramatic improvement over the playing quality of a typical racket.
By isolating the string from the frame with a lightweight isolating matter, shock attenuation occurs between the string and

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Game racket including a string suspension system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Game racket including a string suspension system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Game racket including a string suspension system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3063996

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.