Optical: systems and elements – Optical amplifier – Correction of deleterious effects
Reexamination Certificate
2002-04-10
2003-04-01
Black, Thomas G. (Department: 3662)
Optical: systems and elements
Optical amplifier
Correction of deleterious effects
Reexamination Certificate
active
06542289
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to optical amplifiers. More particularly, the invention relates to controlling gain characteristics of an optical amplifier in the extended or longer wavelength region of the gain spectrum by controlling the amplifier's operating conditions.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The ability to affect spectral gain shape in a predictable and significant manner would be of great use in the design and control of optical amplifiers and, particularly, erbium-doped fiber amplifiers. Expanding the spectral bandwidth in which optical telecommunications signals can be transmitted is also highly desirable. In an erbium-doped amplifier the conventional gain bandwidth, which is commonly referred to as the C-band, extends from approximately 1520 nm to approximately 1560 nm thus providing approximately 40 nm of bandwidth for optical transmission signals but the erbium C-band has inherent limitations. They include a limited bandwidth and non-uniform gain over the C-band which characterizes typical amplifier systems. A discussion of these issues can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 6,320,693 by Cereo et al. entitled “Thermal Tuning of Optical Amplifiers and Use of Same in Wavelength Division Multiplex Systems,” filed on Jun. 29, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as the “Cereo application”), which is incorporated by reference herein as if set forth in its entirely. One approach to increase the useable transmission signal bandwidth of erbium-doped amplifiers is to take advantage of the spectral region from approximately 1565 nm to approximately 1620 nm which is commonly referred to as the erbium extended band or L-band (hereinafter referred to as the L-band).
A long-standing belief with respect to erbium-doped optical amplifiers was that the gain of the amplifier is essentially homogeneous in character and could be described by the homogeneous model discussed in, for example, C. R. Giles et al. “Modeling Erbium-Doped Fiber Amplifiers,”
Journal of Lightwave Technology
, vol. 9, pp. 271-283 (1991), and C. R. Giles et al. “Optical Amplifiers Transform Long Distance Lightwave Telecommunication,”
Proc. IEEE
, vol. 84, pp. 870-883 (1996). The essence of this assumption is that the gain of an amplifier is determined by the average inversion of the active species (for example, the erbium ions in an erbium-doped fiber amplifier) irrespective of the particular signal wavelengths, signal powers, pump wavelength, and pump power which produced that average inversion. In other words, the assumption of homogeneous broadening means that if the gain at any one wavelength is by some means stabilized to a particular value, then a gain at the other wavelengths is similarly stabilized (the stabilized value of the gain being different at different wavelengths). By means of this assumption, a gain spectrum for an amplifier is calculated for a given average inversion.
While the homogeneous gain model may sufficiently describes the wavelength region from about 1540 nm to about 1565 nm, commonly referred to as the “red band,” it has been found that this model does not work well in the “blue band” which extends from approximately 1525 nm to about 1545 nm. This is discussed in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 6,144,486, entitled “Pump Wavelength Tuning of Optical Amplifiers and Use of Same in Wavelength Division Multiplex Systems,” by Bennett et al., which was filed on Jan. 30, 1998 (hereinafter referred to as the “Bennett application”), which is hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in its entirety herein. The blue band exhibits substantial inhomogeneous behavior. For example, when at least one signal wavelength is in this band the gain spectrum can no longer be described by a single average inversion that applies to all active species. Inhomogeneous gain saturation is manifested in the C-band by the well-known phenomenon of spectral hole burning wherein a narrow bandwidth dip occurs in the gain spectrum at the saturating wavelength. Moreover, a temperature-induced gain saturation phenomenon known as “thermal wiggle” has also been observed in the erbium C-band. This is described in the above-referenced Cereo application. Manifestations of spectral hole-burning and thermal wiggle in the L-band operating environment are quite distinct from the manifestations in the C-band. Accordingly, there is a need for a method of controlling the L-band gain spectrum due to the inhomogeneous broadening observed therein.
Gain tilt in WDM transmission systems is also a concern. In general terms, the gain spectrum G(&lgr;) of an optical amplifier is a function of a variety of variables, including input powers at the signal wavelengths &lgr;
1
through &lgr;
n
, (signal wavelengths may themselves vary from application to application and thereby affect the gain spectrum); pump power and pump wavelength, the average inversion of the fiber (itself a function of the input powers and the pump power, as well as the length of the fiber), the temperature of the amplifying medium, and various other variables. Gain tilt is the term used in the art to describe the fact that under different operating conditions, an optical amplifier will amplify different channels to different relative extents. Although various changes in operating conditions can be considered, a particularly important change is that which occurs when the level of signal power at one, or more of the signal wavelengths changes. For example, the signal power at all of the signal wavelengths will change as the distance between amplifiers along a transmission line changes, e.g., the power will go down as the distance increases.
For the simplest case of a two-channel system, the gain tilt (GT) between operating condition O
1
and operating condition O
2
can be written:
GT
O1→O2
(&lgr;
1
, &lgr;
2
)=
&Dgr;G
O1→O2
(&lgr;
1
)/
&Dgr;G
O1→O2
(&lgr;
2
)
where &Dgr;G
O1→O2
(&lgr;
1
) and &Dgr;G
O1→O2
(&lgr;
2
) are, respectively, the changes in gain at &lgr;
1
and &lgr;
2
in going from operating condition O
1
to operating condition O
2
and the units of gain tilt are dB/dB.
A gain tilt of 1.0 means that the change in gains at &lgr;
1
and &lgr;
2
are the same so that if the gain spectrum of the amplifier was substantially flat (i.e., substantially free of ripple) for signals at &lgr;
1
and &lgr;
2
for operating condition O
1
, it will also be substantially flat for operating condition O
2
.
In practice, however, the gain tilt is not equal to 1.0. Instead, a change in operating conditions results in an increase in gain for some wavelengths (e.g., shorter wavelengths) relative to other wavelengths (e.g., longer wavelengths). That is, a plot of G(&lgr;) versus &lgr; appears to have undergone a rotation (a “tilting”) in either a clockwise direction (if the gain at shorter wavelengths is increased relative to the gain at longer wavelengths) or counterclockwise direction (if the gain at longer wavelengths is increased relative to the gain at shorter wavelengths) as a result of the change in operating condition. Hence the name “gain tilt.” In addition to a rotation, the plot of G(&lgr;) versus &lgr; can undergo a net upward or downward shift along the vertical gain axis as a result of the change in operating conditions. Also, localized changes at particular wavelengths can occur affecting ripple.
Rotation of the gain spectrum with a change in operating conditions is a problem in WDM systems since any passive system that is designed to equalize the power output of the channels for one specific set of operating conditions is likely to fail to provide equalization when those conditions are changed.
Accordingly, there is a need to control this gain tilt phenomenon in the L-band.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An embodiment of the invention provides a method of operating an erbium doped optical amplifier for amplifying a signal in a spectral region above about 1565 nm. This method includes the step of controlling the shape of the gain spectrum of the optical amplifier by nonhomogeneously saturating the gain of the amplifier. It may inclu
Black Thomas G.
Corning Incorporated
Hughes Deandra M.
Redman Mary Y.
LandOfFree
Gain saturation tuning in optical amplifiers does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Gain saturation tuning in optical amplifiers, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Gain saturation tuning in optical amplifiers will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3005875