Liquid purification or separation – With means to add treating material – Chromatography
Reexamination Certificate
2002-09-27
2004-11-09
Therkorn, Ernest G. (Department: 1723)
Liquid purification or separation
With means to add treating material
Chromatography
C210S656000, C422S070000, C422S105000, C073S061520
Reexamination Certificate
active
06814859
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to frit materials for use in microfluidic devices.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Chemical and biological separations are routinely performed in various industrial and academic settings to determine the presence and/or quantity of individual species in complex sample mixtures. There exist various techniques for performing such separations. One separation technique, liquid chromatography, encompasses a number of methods that are used for separating closely related components of mixtures. Liquid chromatography is a physical method of separation involving a sample (or sample extract) being dissolved in a mobile phase (which may be a gas, a liquid, or a supercritical fluid). While carrying the sample, the mobile phase is then forced (e.g., by gravity, by applying pressure, or by applying an electric field) through a separation ‘column’ containing an immobile, immiscible stationary phase. Liquid chromatography has many applications including separation, identification, purification, and quantification of compounds within various mixtures.
One category of conventional chromatography includes pressure-driven systems. These systems are operated by supplying a pressurized mobile phase (typically one or more liquid solvents pressurized with a pump) to a separation column. Typical columns have dimensions of several (e.g., 10, 15, 25) centimeters in length and between 3-5 millimeters in diameter, with capillary columns typically having internal diameters between 3-200 microns. The columns are packed with very small diameter (e.g., 5 or 10 micron) particles. It is important to minimize any voids in a packed column, since voids or other irregularities in a separation system can affect the quality of the results of the separation. Thus, most conventional separation columns include specially designed end fittings (typically having compressible ferrule regions) designed to hold packed stationary phase material in place and prevent irregular flow-through regions.
One important component of conventional chromatography columns is a fine porous filter, commonly referred to as a “frit,” which retains the stationary phase material within the column as separations are performed. Frits for conventional high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) columns are typically composed of either a metal, such as stainless steel or titanium, or a polymer, such as polyethylene (PE) or poly (ether ether ketone) (PEEK). The frit pore sizes are typically about two microns for five-micron stationary phase particles. The thickness of such frits typically is between about thirty mils (about 760 microns) and about seventy-five mils (about 2000 microns).
There has been a growing interest in the manufacture and use of microfluidic systems to perform chromatography. This is because, when conducted in microfluidic volumes, chromatography may be carried out using very small volumes of liquid that enhance safety and reduce disposal quantities. One difficulty in fabricating microfluidic devices having integral HPLC columns, however, has been including frits within such devices.
One method proposed for fabricating microfluidic separation devices is disclosed in commonly-assigned, co-pending patent application Ser. No. 60/357,683 (filed Feb. 13, 2002). A plurality of stacked device layers or sheets define microfluidic structures within the device that form the separation columns. The columns are defined in one or more of the device layers by cutting or otherwise removing portions of the device layer such that the remaining portions of the device layer form the lateral boundaries or “walls” of the microstructures. The microstructures are completed by sandwiching the device layer between substrates and/or other device layers to form the “floors” and “ceilings” of the microstructures. The use of multi-layer construction permits robust devices to be fabricated quickly and inexpensively compared to surface micromachining or material deposition techniques that are conventionally employed to produce microfluidic devices.
FIGS. 1A-1C
show a simplified multi-layer microfluidic separation device
10
having a plurality of separation columns
22
A-
22
E defined therein (with numbering for columns
22
B-
22
D omitted for clarity). It will be readily understood by one skilled in the art that the device
10
illustrated in
FIGS. 1A-1B
has been simplified to illustrate the basic structure associated with multi-layer microfluidic separation devices and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. Referring to
FIG. 1C
, the device
10
is fabricated with at least four device layers
14
-
17
. The second device layer
16
defines the lateral boundaries of a plurality of separation columns
22
A-
22
E. The third device layer
15
defines the lateral boundaries of a plurality of exit channels
24
A-
24
E. The first and third device layers
14
,
16
define the lower and upper boundaries, respectively, of the exit channels
24
A-
24
E and the second and fourth device layers
15
,
17
define the lower and upper boundaries, respectively, of the separation columns
22
A-
22
E. A stationary phase material
20
is retained in the separation columns
22
A-
22
E by a frit
26
positioned between the second and third device layers
15
,
16
. Thus, mobile phase solvent (as well as the sample compound being separated) flows through the system as indicated by arrows
30
, while the stationary phase material
20
is kept in place by the frit
26
.
Frit materials used with conventional chromatography columns have a thickness typically ranging from about thirty mils (760 microns) and about seventy-five mils (2000 microns). Because multi-layer multifluidic devices typically use device layer materials having thicknesses ranging from about one mil (twenty-five microns) to about twenty-five mils (635 microns), conventional HPLC frit materials are too thick to be used within a laminated multi-layer microfluidic separation device.
Moreover, certain conventional frit materials, such as stainless steel, may be difficult to bond to the polymer layers of a stacked layer device. In fact, conventional polymer frit materials also may be difficult to bond to other polymers, particularly where it is desirable to avoid the use of adhesives that could contaminate a microfluidic device. Adhesiveless bonding techniques may be used (e.g., by applying heat, pressure or a combination thereof) to attempt to bond a frit material directly to the surrounding device layers. However, it has been found that when frits are composed of material closely related to the material of the surrounding device layers, the temperature required to achieve the desired bonding tends to melt the frit to the degree that it is rendered inoperable or its effectiveness is reduced. When dissimilar materials are used, with desirable melting point differentials, device layer materials and frit materials bond less effectively, frequently resulting in undesirable separation of the layers from the frits at operational pressures.
Initial efforts to incorporate thin polymeric frit materials in multi-layer microfluidic separation devices included materials such as Nuclepore™, a track-etched polycarbonate membrane having a thickness of 6-11 microns, a pore size of 0.015-12.0 microns, and a pore density of 1×10
5
-6×10
8
pores/cm
2
(Whatman, Inc., Clifton, N.J.) (the “polycarbonate frit”). The polycarbonate frit presented several issues related to the fabrication and operation of the assembled device. First, the pore size of the polycarbonate frit is larger than the size of the stationary phase particulate material. Devices made with the polycarbonate frit suffered from a lack of reproducible pressure drop, which was believed to be caused by the clogging or blocking of the pores of the frit with the stationary phase material.
In addition, the polycarbonate frits have significantly different surface energy than the polymeric films most desirable for use in fabricating microfluidic separation devices (particularly polyolefins, including polypr
Koehler Jeffrey A.
Patel Paren P.
Gustafson Vincent K.
Labbee Michael F.
Nanostream, Inc.
Therkorn Ernest G.
LandOfFree
Frit material and bonding method for microfluidic separation... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Frit material and bonding method for microfluidic separation..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Frit material and bonding method for microfluidic separation... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3312873