Frequency domain filtering for down conversion of a DCT...

Details Frequency domain filtering for down conversion of a DCT... Frequency domain filtering for down conversion of a DCT...

1997-03-12

2001-01-16

Lee, Richard (Department: 2713)

Pulse or digital communications

Bandwidth reduction or expansion

C348S403100, C348S416100, C348S441000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06175592

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a decoder having a filter for down conversion of frequency domain encoded signals, e.g. MPEG-2 encoded video signals, and more specifically to a decoder which converts a high resolution video signal to a low resolution video signal by filtering the frequency domain signals.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In the United States a standard has been proposed for digitally encoded high definition television signals (HDTV). A portion of this standard is essentially the same as the MPEG-2 standard, proposed by the Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG) of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). The standard is described in an International Standard (IS) publication entitled, “Information Technology—Generic Coding of Moving Pictures and Associated Audio, Recommendation H.626”, ISO/IEC 13818-2, IS, 11/94 which is available from the ISO and which is hereby incorporated by reference for its teaching on the MPEG-2 digital video coding standard.
The MPEG-2 standard is actually several different standards. In MPEG-2 several different profiles are defined, each corresponding to a different level of complexity of the encoded image. For each profile, different levels are defined, each level corresponding to a different image resolution. One of the MPEG-2 standards, known as Main Profile, Main Level is intended for coding video signals conforming to existing television standards (i.e., NTSC and PAL). Another standard, known as Main Profile, High Level is intended for coding high-definition television images. Images encoded according to the Main Profile, High Level standard may have as many as 1,152 active lines per image frame and 1,920 pixels per line.
The Main Profile, Main Level standard, on the other hand, defines a maximum picture size of 720 pixels per line and 567 lines per frame. At a frame rate of 30 frames per second, signals encoded according to this standard have a data rate of 720*567*30 or 12,247,200 pixels per second. By contrast, images encoded according to the Main Profile, High Level standard have a maximum data rate of 1,152*1,920*30 or 66,355,200 pixels per second. This data rate is more than five times the data rate of image data encoded according to the Main Profile Main Level standard. The standard proposed for HDTV encoding in the United States is a subset of this standard, having as many as 1,080 lines per frame, 1,920 pixels per line and a maximum frame rate, for this frame size, of 30 frames per second. The maximum data rate for this proposed standard is still far greater than the maximum data rate for the Main Profile, Main Level standard.
The MPEG-2 standard defines a complex syntax which contains a mixture of data and control information. Some of this control information is used to enable signals having several different formats to be covered by the standard. These formats define images having differing numbers of picture elements (pixels) per line, differing numbers of lines per frame or field and differing numbers of frames or fields per second. In addition, the basic syntax of the MPEG-2 Main Profile defines the compressed MPEG-2 bit stream representing a sequence of images in six layers, the sequence layer, the group of pictures layer, the picture layer, the slice layer, the macroblock layer, and the block layer. Each of these layers is introduced with control information. Finally, other control information, also known as side information, (e.g. frame type, macroblock pattern, image motion vectors, coefficient zig-zag patterns and dequantization information) are interspersed throughout the coded bit stream.
Down-conversion of high resolution Main Profile, High Level pictures to Main Level, Main Level pictures, or other lower resolution picture formats, has gained increased importance for reducing implementation costs of HDTV. Down conversion allows replacement of expensive high definition monitors used with Main Profile, High Level encoded pictures with inexpensive existing monitors which have a lower picture resolution to support, for example, Main Profile, Main Level encoded pictures, such as NTSC or 525 progressive monitors. Down conversion converts a high definition input picture into lower resolution picture for display on the lower resolution monitor.
To effectively receive the digital images, a decoder should process the video signal information rapidly. To be optimally effective, the coding systems should be relatively inexpensive and yet have sufficient power to decode these digital signals in real time.
One method of down conversion of the prior art simply low pass filters and decimates the decoded high resolution, Main Profile, High Level picture to form an image suitable for display on a conventional television receiver. Consequently, using existing techniques, a decoder employing down-conversion may be implemented using a single processor having a complex design, considerable memory, and operating on the spatial domain image at a high data rate to perform this function. The high resolution, and high data rate, however, requires very expensive circuitry, which would be contrary to the implementation of a decoder in a consumer television receiver in which cost is a major factor.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An apparatus for forming a decimated video signal receives an encoded video signal representing a video image, the encoded video signal being a frequency-domain transformed video signal. The apparatus includes means for providing the encoded video signal as a plurality of high resolution frequency-domain video coefficient values. The apparatus further includes down-conversion filter means for receiving and weighting selected ones of the plurality of high resolution frequency-domain video coefficient values to form a set of filtered frequency-domain video coefficients; and inverse-transform means for receiving and transforming the filtered frequency-domain video coefficients into a set of low resolution pixel sample values. The apparatus also includes a decimating processor for receiving and retaining selected ones of the set of low resolution pixel sample values to provide the decimated video signal.


REFERENCES:
patent: 3997772 (1976-12-01), Crochiere et al.
patent: 4468688 (1984-08-01), Gabriel et al.
patent: 4472732 (1984-09-01), Bennett et al.
patent: 4472785 (1984-09-01), Kasuga
patent: 4536745 (1985-08-01), Yamaguchi et al.
patent: 4631750 (1986-12-01), Gabriel et al.
patent: 4652908 (1987-03-01), Fling et al.
patent: 4774581 (1988-09-01), Shiratsuchi
patent: 4870661 (1989-09-01), Yamada et al.
patent: 4908874 (1990-03-01), Gabriel
patent: 5057911 (1991-10-01), Stec et al.
patent: 5262854 (1993-11-01), Ng
patent: 5274372 (1993-12-01), Luthra et al.
patent: 5327235 (1994-07-01), Richards
patent: 5331346 (1994-07-01), Shields et al.
patent: 5389923 (1995-02-01), Iwata et al.
patent: 5481568 (1996-01-01), Yada
patent: 5483474 (1996-01-01), Arbeiter et al.
patent: 5489903 (1996-02-01), Wilson et al.
patent: 5528301 (1996-06-01), Hau et al.
patent: 5613084 (1997-03-01), Hau
patent: 5614957 (1997-03-01), Boyce et al.
patent: 5726711 (1998-03-01), Boyce
patent: 5737019 (1998-04-01), Kim
patent: 5774206 (1998-06-01), Wasserman et al.
patent: 5784494 (1998-07-01), Strongin et al.
patent: 5835151 (1998-11-01), Sun et al.
patent: 5841479 (1998-11-01), Van Gestel et al.
Jill Boyce, John Henderson and Larry Pearlstein, “SDTV Receivers With HDTV Decoding Capability,” ACATS Technical Subgroup Meeting, May 18, 1995, Washington, D.C. , (18 pp).
H. Blair Benson, revised by Jerry Whitaker, “Television Engineering Handbook,” (Revised copyright 1992, 1986 by McGraw-Hill, Inc., (7 pp.).
Jill Boyce and Larry Pearlstein “Low-Cost All Format ATV Decoding With Improved Quality” 30th Advanced Motion Imaging Conference, Paper #11, Feb. 2, 1996 (7 pp.).
Jack S. Fuhrer, “The All Format Decoder”, Hitachi America, Ltd., Jun. 3, 1996 (11 pp.).
“Recommended Practices For Video Encoding Using The ATSC Digital Television Standard-Consideration Of Downsampling Decoders”, Jun. 3, 1996 (6 pp.).
Larry Pearlstein “Discus

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Frequency domain filtering for down conversion of a DCT... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Frequency domain filtering for down conversion of a DCT..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Frequency domain filtering for down conversion of a DCT... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2452814