Framework for evaluating web search scoring functions

Data processing: database and file management or data structures – Database and file access – Post processing of search results

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C707S748000

Reexamination Certificate

active

08060497

ABSTRACT:
Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer program products, for testing web search scoring functions. A query is received. A first and a second scoring function are selected by receiving search results responsive to the query; applying candidate scoring functions to the search results to determine scores for the search results for each candidate scoring function; identifying pairs of the candidate scoring functions, and calculating a diversity score for each of the pairs. A pair of candidate scoring functions is chosen from the one or more pairs of candidate scoring functions based on the diversity scores, and the alpha function is selected as the first scoring function and the beta function is selected as the second scoring function. The plurality of search results are presented in an order according to scores from the first scoring function and are presented in an order according to scores from the second scoring function.

REFERENCES:
patent: 7251654 (2007-07-01), Eiron et al.
patent: 7716202 (2010-05-01), Slackman
patent: 7756867 (2010-07-01), Sue
patent: 7761448 (2010-07-01), Meyerzon et al.
patent: 7783632 (2010-08-01), Richardson et al.
patent: 7814085 (2010-10-01), Pfleger et al.
patent: 7814099 (2010-10-01), Wang
patent: 7822751 (2010-10-01), O'Clair et al.
patent: 7917503 (2011-03-01), Mowatt et al.
patent: 2010/0125570 (2010-05-01), Chapelle et al.
patent: 2010/0223258 (2010-09-01), Ghahramani et al.
The Basics—Google Custom Search API—Google Code [online], [retrieved on Feb. 26, 2009]. Retrieved from the Internet: http://code.google.com/apis/customsearch/docs/basics.html, 8 pages.
Brin, S. and Page, L., “The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine” [online], [retrieved on Jul. 23, 2009]. Retrieved from the Internet: http://infolab.stanford.edu/pub/papers/google.pdf, 20 pages.
Changing the Ranking of Your Search Results—Google Custom Search API—Google Code [online], [retrieved Feb. 26, 2009]. Retrieved from the Internet: http://code.google.com/apis/customsearch/docs/ranking.html, 20 pages.
Chapter 2. Web Search [online], [retrieved on Feb. 26, 2009]. Retrieved from the Internet: http://developer.yahoo.com/search/boss/boss—guide/Web—Search.html, 3 pages.
Chapter 4. Image Search [online], [retrieved on Feb. 26, 2009] [. Retrieved from the Internet: http://developer.yahoo.com/search/boss/boss—guide/Submit—Image—Queries,html, 1 page.
Chapter 5. News Search [online], [retrieved on Feb. 26, 2009]. Retrieved from the Internet: http://developer.yahoo.com/search/boss/boss—guide/News—Search.html, 1 page.
Mease, D., “A Penalized Maximum Likelihood Approach for the Ranking of College Football Teams Independent of Victory Margins”, University of Michigan, Department of Statistics, 17 pages.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Framework for evaluating web search scoring functions does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Framework for evaluating web search scoring functions, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Framework for evaluating web search scoring functions will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4276409

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.