Multiplex communications – Communication over free space – Having a plurality of contiguous regions served by...
Reexamination Certificate
1999-07-02
2002-11-26
Kincaid, Lester G. (Department: 2685)
Multiplex communications
Communication over free space
Having a plurality of contiguous regions served by...
C370S347000, C375S224000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06487185
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to digital data transmission and in particular it relates to digital data decoders. The following description is based on the GSM cellular communication s system for which the invention is of particular utility. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art, however that the invention may be applied to other systems of digital data transmission.
Reference is made to U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,598,506 and 5,596,678 to Wigren et al; U.S. Pat. No. 5,557,639 to Heikkila; and “MOBILE RADIO COMMUNICATIONS” published by John Wiley & Sons, Raymond Steele (Ed.) for a description of the prior art and technological background. The European Telecommunications Standards Institute Publication TS GSM 5/03 Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Channel Coding, version 5.3.1 is also relevant.
The following abbreviations are used herein:
GSM: Global System for Mobile communications (formerly Groupe Special Mobile);
BCCCH: Broadcast Control Channel;
TCH/F: Traffic Channel/Full Rate;
TCH/FS: Traffic Channel/Full Rate for Speech;
CRC: Cyclic Redundancy Check; and
PBER: Pseudo Bit Error Rate
The GSM cellular communications system uses the Full Rate speech codec as default. The full rate speech codec encodes 160, 8 kHz samples into 260 bits containing 76 parameters. These 260 bits are divided into two groups based on their subjective importance to speech quality.
The 78 least important bits are known as class II bits and are unprotected. Corruption of these class II bits have little audible effect on speech quality. The most important 182 bits are known as class I bits and are protected by a half rate convolutional code.
The class I bits are further subdivided into Ia and Ib, such that the most significant 50 bits (Ia) are additionally protected by a 3 bit cyclic redundancy check (CRC). In order to prevent unpleasant audio artifacts on the speech any frame erasure mechanism must detect all frames with class Ia errors and frames with more than a certain number of class Ib errors, as precisely and efficiently as possible for all propagation channel types.
Network Operators wish to maximize the capacity and quality of their networks, One of the ways in which this can be achieved is to employ slow frequency hopping. A slow frequency hopping channel follows a cyclic pseudo-random hopping sequence, each burst being transmitted on a frequency which is different from the frequency of the previous burst. A performance gain is achieved from the frequency diversity of the hopping sequence.
The use of slow frequency hopping also allows greater re-use of the frequencies allocated to an Network Operator, thereby increasing the capacity available. One side effect of slow hopping and frequency re-use is the creation of a special class of propagation channels, known as Telstra channels, so called because the Australian Network Operator Telstra implemented its own mobile station (MS) performance test for this type of channel.
This class of propagation channel (Telstra) is characterized by a slow frequency hopping channel, hopping across n (typically n=4) frequencies, one of which has a high level of co-channel interference present (typically −10 to −20 dB) which may arise from an adjacent cell's BCCH broadcast or traffic channel, The effect of this interference is that for the burst affected by it, the probability of the bits being in error tends toward 50% (i.e. essentially random) and the other n−1 frequencies have a low probability of error.
Because of the interleaving and re-ordering of the TCH/FS channel, these erroneous bits are evenly distributed across the whole speech frame, interlaced with the correct bits from the other bursts. This is in direct contrast to ordinary (non-Telstra like) channels where all bursts contributing to the speech frame are equally likely to contain errors so that after the interleaving has been removed and re-ordering performed, it is likely that non-evenly distributed bits in the encoded speech frame will be in error.
The r=½, K=5 code used in this GSM coding scheme is powerful enough successfully to correct errors on a Telstra channel. This behavior was originally noted by Telstra for a 1:4 hopping channel.
The conventional frame erasure algorithm used for the GSM TCH/FS channel is composed of two individual tests: a 3 bit CRC check and a pseudo-bit error rate (PBER) threshold. The PBER is calculated by re-encoding the decoded class I bits and comparing them, bit by bit, with the original received bits. The CRC check is computed over the class Ia bits of the speech frame. The number of estimated errors is calculated for all of the encoded class I bits. The frame erasure algorithm proceeds as follows:
1. Convolutionally decode the 378 encoded class I symbols to give the 189 class I bits.
2. Perform a CRC check on the class Ia bits. If the CRC check fails, mark the frame for erasure.
3. Re-encode the 189 class Ia bits and then perform a bit by bit comparison between the re-encoded symbols and the original received symbols, to compute the number of differences.
4. If the number of differences exceeds the PBER threshold then the frame is marked for erasure.
This conventional algorithm works well for “non-Telstra like” channels. However, the performance of the CRC check is dependent on the PBER threshold value. The lower the PBER threshold, the more reliable the CRC check becomes. A PBER threshold value typically of between 45-60 is required.
The conventional algorithm does not work well for “Telstra like” channels because they require too high for the CRC check to be reliable for use with non-Telstra channels. This is because the convolutional code can correct a larger number of errors for a Telstra channel due to the even, periodic distribution of errors and if the PBER threshold is set too low for “Telstra like” channels, too many error free speech frames will be erased.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Objects of the present invention are better frame erasure performance for Telstra 1:3 and 1:4 channels and better error checking of class Ib bits for all channels.
According to the invention, there is provided a method of identifying a frame for erasure in a digital data transmission system by estimating the quality of each burst in a series of bursts ranking each burst according to quality estimates to form a ranked series of bursts and using the ranking position and measured value of the largest difference in quality estimates between successive bursts in the ranked series of bursts to set a PBER threshold level.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5557639 (1996-09-01), Heikkila et al.
LandOfFree
Frame erasure for digital data transmission systems does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Frame erasure for digital data transmission systems, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Frame erasure for digital data transmission systems will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2971273