Chemical apparatus and process disinfecting – deodorizing – preser – Process disinfecting – preserving – deodorizing – or sterilizing – Deodorizing
Reexamination Certificate
2002-10-28
2004-06-15
Warden, Sr., Robert J. (Department: 1744)
Chemical apparatus and process disinfecting, deodorizing, preser
Process disinfecting, preserving, deodorizing, or sterilizing
Deodorizing
C422S122000, C422S306000, C004S347000, C424S076100
Reexamination Certificate
active
06749805
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention is a device for removing odors from air. More particularly, the invention relates to a self-contained device having a converter that chemically reduces malodor to innocuous compounds.
2. Description of the Related Art
Since the dawning of the modern age many people have at one time or another contemplated ways to cope with or eliminate malodorous air and ammonia that arises during use of the contemporary toilet. A number of methods have been employed for this purpose. These include burning candles, use of incense, opening windows, switching on overhead fans, spraying fragrances, use of elaborate toilet bowl designs and so on. These methods are ineffective, a nuisance to implement or too costly to install. Apart from the invention described herein, a single product, which is safe, effective and economical in dealing with this problem, has not emerged. Past solutions may have acted to ameliorate foul air to a limited degree, but they did so in a circuitous fashion—by rerouting the flatus or hiding it with fragrances and the like. Previous approaches do not target the fundamental cause of the trouble. The direct method of addressing this problem lies in the chemistry associated with the malodorous components themselves.
In contrast to fecal matter, tissue fluid, blood or other bio-fluids, the body of knowledge on the biochemical events giving rise to the formation of flatus is scant. Furthermore, there is not a single source that deals with the subject in a thorough fashion. Information on the compositional aspects of flatus taken from varied sources reveals the physiology and chemistry to be relatively plain. However, eliminating its negative properties affords a challenge. Flatus arises from aerophagia (swallowed boluses of air), gas diffusion (e.g. carbon dioxide) from the blood, bacterial production in the lumen, descending and sigmoid colons and from trace quantities of non-gaseous components carried with the flatus by mass transfer during expulsion. Swallowed air accounts for a large portion of nitrogen, oxygen and carbon dioxide, while diffusion from gas gradients contributes much of the remaining carbon dioxide and nitrogen portions. Methane, hydrogen, hydrogen sulfide (as well as a small amount of mercaptan) and carbon dioxide result from bacterial fermentation of residual ingesta at the point of the lumen and at locations further down in the alimentary tract. The trace non-gases are primarily heterocyclic amines from protein-rich ingesta. Specifically, the two amino acids, proline and tryptophan can lead to pyrrole and indole (C4H5N and C8H7N respectively) derivatives subsequent to deamination/decarboxylation of the parent molecules. Nitrogen from deamination is nearly quantitatively converted to ammonia and later to urea in a formal condensation with carbon dioxide in vivo. Energy from that transformation is captured and stored in lipid form as ATP for later use in the body. The remaining moieties of the proline and tryptophan precursors are readily converted in vivo to pyrrole and indole nuclei respectively. Both of these materials are thermodynamically stable owing to their aromaticity, but this is especially germane in the case of indole and its derivatives, which are resistant to further catabolic breakdown. Its structural integrity and associated physical-chemical properties are preserved while in the body. Consequently, indole is believed to be more ubiquitous in flatus among the general population, and the only alkaloid of appreciable significance in flatus. Even so the majority of this non-gaseous component will be eliminated as—is in fecal matter rather than flatus. The only other relevant constituent in flatus is low molecular weight carboxylic acid (butyric acid for example) that is generated from enzyme hydrolysis of ester oils. Flatus components and their approximate relative abundance are depicted below.
TABLE 1
[t1]
Major (and coincidentally odorless) Components of Flatus
Flatus Concentration Constituent Range
Oxygen 0-10%
Hydrogen 5-35%
Methane 0-30%
Carbon Dioxide 5-50%
Total Minor Comp. (Table 2) <1%
TABLE 2
[t3]
Minor (and coincidentally malodorous) Components of Flatus
Flatus Concentration Constituent Range (parts per million)
Indoles 0.5-10 ppm
Hydrogen Sulfide 0.5-10 ppm
Pyrroles <10 ppm
Carboxylic Acids 1-100 ppm
Mercaptans <0.1 ppm
Miscellaneous trace
It is to be noted that there is variation in flatus for individuals between expulsions as well as variation between individuals within the general population as a whole. For example, one third of the population produces no methane. This is why only ranges for flatus components are given.
The major components (Table 1) are present at a strength that is orders of magnitude greater than the minor ones (Table 2). The sum of all minor components in flatus seldom exceeds 1%. However, the most interesting aspect of flatus composition is that there is no major component which is malodorous—and there is no minor component which is not malodorous. Thus, as it is the principal intent of this invention to eliminate the experience of foul air exposure, it was only necessary to address problems created by the minor components (Table 2), and to a lesser extent, ammonia from urination. Indoles, pyrroles, carboxylic acids and most mercaptans are not gases at ambient or in vivo conditions. These four minor components, therefore, are susceptible to capture by activated charcoal. Indeed, in prior art, cited herein, a few previous inventors have incorporated the use of activated charcoal in their apparatuses. These devices were undoubtedly successful in removing these four substances, at least to a limited degree.
On the other hand activated charcoal cannot be used to mitigate hydrogen sulfide, contrary to numerous efforts and claims of the past. The mechanism for adsorption by activated charcoal involves, in sequence, condensation, Van der Walls attraction and capillary action to the interior core of the charcoal particle, at or near the boiling point of the intended substrate. With a boiling point of less than −60° C., hydrogen sulfide cannot undergo even the first step of the adsorption process unless it is taking place under cryogenic conditions.
As ambient conditions are not conducive to this adsorption process, it would be advantageous to devise an alternative method for removing hydrogen sulfide, within the operating parameters to be found in the user environment.
SUMMARY OF INVENTION
The invention lies in a self-contained foul air eliminator comprising a housing having an intake port, an exhaust port, an impeller, and a converter. The converter includes an oxidizing agent or a hydro-sulfur labile compound in an amount sufficient to effectively react with malodorous compounds in air driven by the impeller from the intake port to the exhaust port through the converter. The converter further includes an aqueous solution of a promoter carried by a support in a position to accelerate the reaction between the oxidizing agent or hydro-sulfur labile compound and the malodorous compounds.
Preferably, the housing contains a power source such as a battery to render it portable. For example, it can be mounted to a toilet. A foul air eliminator according to the invention can also have the housing adapted to connect to a 120-volt household current to drive the impeller. Preferably, the impeller operates in a range of 20 SCFM to 150 SCFM. In another aspect, eliminator can have a fragrance repository between the converter and the exhaust port.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4604110 (1986-08-01), Frazier
patent: 5454122 (1995-10-01), Bergeron
patent: 5896591 (1999-04-01), Horan et al.
patent: 6003157 (1999-12-01), Bruyere
patent: 6528014 (2003-03-01), Parkhurst et al.
Osborn Morey E.
Parkhurst Stephen L.
Conley Sean E
S L Parkhurst Corporation
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
Warden, Sr. Robert J.
LandOfFree
Foul air eliminator does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Foul air eliminator, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Foul air eliminator will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3310178