Brakes – Internal-resistance motion retarder – Having a thrust member with a variable volume chamber
Reexamination Certificate
2000-12-27
2002-06-11
Schwartz, Christopher P. (Department: 3613)
Brakes
Internal-resistance motion retarder
Having a thrust member with a variable volume chamber
C188S306000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06401884
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a device that uses a fluid to dampen a force that tends to move the plane of rotation of a steerable wheel or wheels of a vehicle having a shaft used to steer such wheel or wheels away from being generally parallel to the frame of such vehicle. It also relates to any steering device, such as a ski of a snowmobile or the exhaust jet of a personal watercraft, that uses a shaft or the like in the steering process.
2. Description of the Related Art
U.S. Pat. No. 4,773,514 for a Hydraulic Damping Device is quite similar to the present invention.
A wing
23
is rotatably mounted within a hollow chamber
11
of a casing
6
. Either the wing
23
or the casing
6
is rigidly attached to a portion of a motorcycle that rotates with the fork that holds the front wheel of a motorcycle. The other of these two elements, i.e., either the casing
6
or the wing
23
is rigidly connected to the frame of the motorcycle. Therefore, whenever the front wheel of the motorcycle is turned to the left or right, there will be relative motion between the wing
23
and the casing
6
.
The chamber
11
is sealed to prevent the leakage of a fluid and is filled with hydraulic fluid. The wing
23
is “dimensioned to fit sealingly to the bottom part
12
, the cover
13
and the inside of the peripheral wall
10
c
” so that hydraulic fluid cannot pass around the wing
23
. Movement of the wing
23
is, consequently, impeded by the hydraulic fluid, thereby dampening the turning left and right of the front wheel.
The degree of dampening is controlled with a channel
24
in the cover
13
for the casing
6
. The channel
24
has ports near the sides
10
a
,
10
b
of the chamber
11
which permit hydraulic fluid to flow around the wing
23
. The effective cross-sectional area of channel
24
is controlled by a screw
27
that by being turned is inserted farther into channel
24
. The farther screw
27
is inserted into channel
24
, the smaller is the effective area of channel
24
and the greater is the impedance to the flow of hydraulic fluid and, therefore, the dampening.
As the knob
29
which turns the screw
27
is moved radially, a spring-loaded ball
33
fits into a number of circumferentially distributed bores
32
having a smaller diameter than the ball
33
to “facilitate proper setting” of the screw
27
. Still, it is difficult precisely to determine the degree to which the screw
27
has intruded within the channel
24
and, therefore, the degree of dampening that will be achieved.
Moreover, a somewhat complex system employing two valve balls
34
,
35
and a pressure spring
42
which maintains the balls
34
,
35
in their open positions until the flow of hydraulic fluid, caused by a rapid turning of the front wheel, forces one or the other of the balls
34
,
35
, depending upon the direction of the turn, closed. Unfortunately, contaminants, such as those created through the wear of parts in the Hydraulic Damping Device, can cause such a valving system to stick.
Additionally, bypass channels
25
and
26
eliminate dampening near the center of chamber
11
by allowing hydraulic fluid to flow from the center to the sides of chamber
11
. The extent of the central area where dampening has been eliminated is determined by rotating a sleeve to align one of several different openings
56
a, b, c, d
and
57
a, b, c, d
with one of several different connecting ports
47
a, b, c, d
and
48
a, b, c, d.
Having all ports for the bypass channels in the cover
13
, however creates the possibility that when the wing
23
is near either side
10
a
or side
10
b
, the wing will either be farther toward such side
10
a
or
10
b
than is any port or will be under the port closest to such side
10
a
or
10
b
. Because the wing
23
is “dimensioned to fit sealingly to the bottom part
12
, the cover
13
and the inside of the peripheral wall
10
c
” so that hydraulic fluid cannot pass around the wing
23
, either of these possible situations will preclude hydraulic fluid from being transferred to the side of the wing
23
that is toward the nearer side
10
a
,
10
b
and thereby impede the proper functioning of the wing
23
.
The angular size of chamber
11
is not specified. From
FIG. 2
, however, it appears to be substantially less than 180 degrees.
Ours can move through a full 180 degrees.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The basic features of the present Fluidic Dampening Device are similar to those of U.S. Pat. No. 4,773,514, i.e., a housing contains a generally sector-shaped chamber having a first side wall, a second side wall, a peripheral wall, a bottom, and a rotatably mounted wiper. A faceplate is sealingly mounted to the top of the housing. And the wiper has dimensions such that it sealingly moves past the faceplate, the bottom of the housing, and the periphal wall of the housing.
There is, however, only a single bypass channel; and it is contained within the housing, rather than in the faceplate. Moreover, the bypass channel is kept as simple as possible by containing no valving. This eliminates the possibility of a contaminant causing such a valve to stick.
The bypass channel has a first port in the first side wall, preferably near the peripheral wall, and a second port in the second side wall, preferably near the peripheral wall. Near the first port, the first side wall may contain an extension that is made simply to accommodate the tool that create the chamber in the housing if this is done by grinding or drilling; similarly, near the second port, the second side wall may contain an extension that is made simply to accommodate the tool that create the chamber in the housing if this is done by grinding or drilling.
Having the ports in the side walls eliminates the possibility that the wiper can be so close to a side wall that no fluid can be transferred to the side of the wiper that is nearer to that side wall.
And the amount of dampening is controlled by having indentations of varying sizes formed at distinct points around a control shaft situated so that either no indentation or only one indentation lies within the bypass channel at a given time. Moreover, each indentation in the shaft is aligned with a détente in the bottom side of a knob attached to the top of the shaft. A spring is placed in a vertical corridor in the housing, which vertical corridor is closed at the bottom. A ball is placed atop the spring so that it presses against the bottom of the knob. The size of each détente is sufficiently large that the ball entering a detente is very perceptible to one turning the knob. Also, a unique visual indicator, preferably a numeral, is placed above each détente. Therefore, a user knows precisely the size of the indentation that is in the bypass channel and, therefore, the degree of dampening that will occur.
If the knob is stopped between détentes, no indentation will be within the bypass channel, i.e., the bypass channel will be completely closed so that dampening is at a maximum.
Grooves are placed in the bottom of the faceplate at desired locations to select areas where there will be no dampening because a viscous fluid, preferably hydraulic fluid, that will be placed in the chamber can flow above the wiper as the wiper turns. This is much simpler than the bypass channels of U.S. Pat. No. 4,773,514 and, consequently, less prone to being clogged by contaminants.
The location of such grooves is selected at the time of manufacture and is, preferably, symmetrical about the center of the chamber and extends to each side wall of the chamber, leaving an area in the center of the chamber where dampening will occur.
Finally, the sector of the chamber in the Hydraulic Damping Device of U.S. Pat. No. 4,773,514 covers only approximately ninety degrees, whereas the sector of the chamber in the present Fluidic Dampening Device is much larger, preferably approximately one hundred twenty degrees.
REFERENCES:
patent: 1066255 (1913-07-01), Cubbison et al.
patent: 1128228 (1915-02-01), Collar
patent: 1506495 (1924-08-01), MacRae
pat
Norman Ralph S.
Patterson Dennis
Fehr Thompson E.
Pezzlo Benjamin A
Schwartz Christopher P.
LandOfFree
Fluidic dampening device does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Fluidic dampening device, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Fluidic dampening device will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2964609