Incremental printing of symbolic information – Ink jet – Ejector mechanism
Reexamination Certificate
1999-03-02
2002-02-19
Barlow, John (Department: 2853)
Incremental printing of symbolic information
Ink jet
Ejector mechanism
Reexamination Certificate
active
06347861
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention generally relates to printing technology, and more particularly to a fluid ejection device having a mechanical intercoupling structure embedded within a chamber layer.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Substantial developments have been made in the field of electronic printing technology. A wide variety of highly-efficient printing systems currently exist which are capable of dispensing ink in a rapid and accurate manner, including thermal inkjet systems. The ink delivery systems described herein (and other printing units using different ink ejection devices) typically include an ink containment unit (e.g. a housing, vessel, or tank) having a self-contained supply of ink therein in order to form an ink cartridge. In a standard ink cartridge, the ink containment unit is coupling with the remaining components of the cartridge to produce an integral and unitary structure wherein the ink supply is considered to be “on-board.”
Printing units using thermal inkjet technology basically involve an apparatus which includes at least one ink reservoir chamber in fluid communication with a substrate (preferably made of silicon and/or other comparable materials) having a plurality of thin-film heating resistors thereon. The substrate and resistors are maintained within a structure that is characterized as a “printhead.” Selective activation of the resistors causes thermal excitation of the ink materials stored inside the reservoir chamber and expulsion thereof from the printhead. Representative thermal inkjet systems are discussed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,500,895 to Buck et al.; 4,794,409 to Cowger et al.; 4,509,062 to Low et al.; 4,929,969 to Morris; 4,771,295 to Baker et al.; 5,278,584 to Keefe et al.; and the
Hewlett-Packard Journal
, Vol. 39, No. 4 (August 1988), all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
A typical printhead will have at least one or more ink ejectors (e.g. thin-film resistor elements in a thermal inkjet system) on a substrate. The ink ejectors are each positioned within a compartment defined as a “firing chamber”. Ink materials are then delivered to the firing chambers and thereafter expelled on-demand by the ink ejectors. Between and around the firing chambers on the substrate are numerous conductive circuit elements which electrically communicate with the ink ejectors and other components on the substrate. The circuit elements also communicate with the operating components of the printer unit that generate the electrical signals.
Positioned directly over the circuit elements and exposed portions of the underlying substrate is a composition defined as an “ink barrier material” or “ink barrier layer” or “chamber layer”. The ink barrier material functions as an electrical insulator and “sealant” which covers these components and prevents them from coming in contact with the ink compositions being delivered. Likewise, the ink barrier material protects the circuit elements from physical impact, contaminants, and the like. As a result, electrical shorts, breaks, and similar problems are avoided which improves the overall reliability and longevity of the printing system under consideration.
Many different chemical compositions may be used to fabricate the ink barrier layer, with organic compositions (e.g. polymers and other related materials), including those with a high dielectric constant. After placement of the ink barrier material (preferably in a discrete layer) on the underlying substrate and thin-film circuitry, an orifice plate with multiple ink ejection openings therethrough is positioned on the barrier layer and over the firing chambers which contain the ink ejectors. The orifice plate is then adhesively or otherwise affixed in position.
A factor in printhead design involves the overall structural integrity of the entire printhead unit. The term “structural integrity” as used herein generally concerns the ability of the individual components in the printhead to remain affixed together in a strong and cohesive manner without the detachment or delamination of any elements. It is desired that ink “barrier” materials within the printhead are securely attached to the underlying thin film circuitry and substrate associated therewith.
Notwithstanding the beneficial features discussed above, problems may arise in printhead systems if the barrier layer “delaminates” or otherwise detaches in a complete or partial manner from the underlying substrate and circuitry thereon. These problems typically cause (1) ink “shorts” in which ink from the firing chambers and adjacent regions in the printhead “wicks” into any gaps formed between the thin-film circuitry and the barrier layer; (2) undesired changes in firing chamber architecture caused by barrier delamination around the chambers; and/or (3) the propagation of additional cracks, fissures, gaps, stress lines, and the like once the initial delamination of the barrier layer occurs. All of these undesired situations can lead to improper ink drop ejection, decreased longevity, reduced reliability, and an overall deterioration in print quality. Accordingly, gap-free adhesion of the substrate (and circuitry thereon) to the ink barrier layer is desired.
The chemical interactions which adhere these components to each other within the printhead are not well understood from a molecular standpoint. However, it is currently believed that the chemical bond between the organic ink barrier layer and the substrate having the electrical circuitry thereon is one of the weakest and most potentially troublesome in the entire printhead structure. In attempting to solve this problem, the following diverse approaches have been considered: (1) elaborate cleaning and “decontamination” of the substrate, thin-film electrical circuitry, and surrounding components; (2) chemical modification of the barrier layer, substrate, and/or electrical circuit elements; and/or (3) the use of additional (e.g. supplemental) chemical adhesive materials. However, it is not currently believed that any of these approaches provide sufficient results from a cost, efficiency, and structural design standpoint. Thus, there is a desire for an effective solution to the foregoing problem in which a high degree of structural integrity is maintained between the ink barrier layer and substrate/thin-film circuitry in an inkjet or other ink delivery printhead.
Therefore, it is desirable to (1) prevent delamination problems between the ink barrier layer and underlying thin-film structures in a wide variety of different thermal inkjet and non-thermal-inkjet printheads; (2) avoid electrical shorts and undesired changes in printhead architecture which may occur when barrier layer delamination takes place; (3) improve adhesion between the ink barrier layer and the circuit-containing substrate without using supplemental adhesives and elaborate decontamination procedures; (4) avoid crack propagation throughout the printhead which can result from ink barrier layer delamination; and (5) accomplish these goals in an economical manner which is especially well-suited for use on a mass production scale.
SUMMARY
A fluid ejection device has a fluid ejector on a substrate, and a mechanical intercoupling structure disposed on the substrate. A chamber layer is disposed on the substrate, and is substantially embedding the mechanical intercoupling structure and defining the side walls of an ejection chamber.
These and other benefits, objects, features, and advantages will now be discussed in the following Brief Description of the Drawings and Detailed Description of Preferred Embodiments.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4329698 (1982-05-01), Smith
patent: 4438191 (1984-03-01), Cloutier et al.
patent: 4500895 (1985-02-01), Buck et al.
patent: 4509062 (1985-04-01), Low et al.
patent: 4660058 (1987-04-01), Cordery
patent: 4749291 (1988-06-01), Kobayashi et al.
patent: 4771295 (1988-09-01), Baker et al.
patent: 4794409 (1988-12-01), Cowger et al.
patent: 4929969 (1990-05-01), Morris
patent: 5278584 (1994-01-01), Keefe et al.
patent: 5443713 (1995-08-01), Hindman
Pending U.S.
Hernandez Juan J.
Tom Dennis W.
Brooke Michael S
Hewlett--Packard Company
LandOfFree
Fluid ejection device having mechanical intercoupling... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Fluid ejection device having mechanical intercoupling..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Fluid ejection device having mechanical intercoupling... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2948293