Flow diffuser

Details Flow diffuser Flow diffuser

1999-07-23

2001-09-18

Hook, James (Department: 3752)

Pipes and tubular conduits

With flow regulators and/or baffles

Flow facilitating

C138S037000, C138S043000, C138S046000, C251S118000, C137S625280

Reexamination Certificate

active

06289934

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates a flow diffuser with an elongate discharge nozzle which can be used as a 90° elbow in piping systems. In an alternative embodiment, the flow diffuser can be used in conjunction with a fire hydrant. The present flow diffuser facilitates better measurement because it promotes laminar flow.
2. Description of the Prior Art
In piping systems, orderly or streamlined flow is desirable. When a fluid passes through a conventional valve or a 90° turn at a conventional elbow, the fluid flow becomes disorderly or turbulent. This turbulent fluid does not return to a streamlined or laminar flow for at least 40-50 pipe diameters downstream of an elbow. (Assuming that the downstream piping is axially aligned with the outlet of the valve or elbow and has the same inside diameter.)
Turbulence can be caused by a number of factors including, but not limited to, boundary layer separation, sometimes referred to as flow separation, vortices, pressure waves, and/or cavitation. Turbulence in pipe systems often causes noise, vibration, erosion and/or stress cracking. Reduction of turbulence is desirable in valves, at elbows, in piping systems generally, upstream of gas or liquid measurement and downstream of compressor stations.
Turbulence also causes a drop in fluid pressure. Each time a fluid flows through a valve or an elbow, there is an incremental drop in fluid pressure between the inlet and the outlet. In transmission pipelines, pressure drops are undesirable. If the fluid pressure drops low enough, additional pumping stations may be required. In any event, adding pressure to the fluid in the pipeline increases transportation costs. Because the elbow of the present invention reduces turbulence, it has less of a pressure drop when compared with conventional 90° elbows.
Elbow induced turbulence has been recognized and addressed by a number of prior art designs including the vanes of U.S. Pat. No. 5,197,509 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,323,661 which are located upstream from an elbow. These vanes impart rotation to the fluid as it passes through the elbow to reduce downstream turbulence. Others have considered the deleterious effects of elbow induced turbulence and have included rotation vanes both upstream and downstream of an elbow as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,529,084. These inventions seek to create non-turbulent or laminar flow after fluid passes through a conventional elbow.
The use of curved vanes to influence fluid flow for various reasons is not a new concept. In U.S. Pat. No. 1,570,907, a plurality of vanes were used in a locomotive to separate water from steam.
In some piping systems, granular or particulate material will quickly wear out a conventional elbow. One way to address this problem is by increasing the radius of curvature of the elbow to about 10 pipe diameters. However, this is not entirely an acceptable solution, especially in areas where space is at a premium. There have been many attempts to solve this erosion problem, including the use of inserts in the elbow, the insert being a disposable item intended to be replaced when it wears out. Examples of this type of replaceable insert in an elbow can be found in the following U.S. Pat. Nos. 1,357,259; 2,911,235; 3,942,684; and 5,590,916.
Other proposed solutions to this erosion problem include a circular pocket off the elbow. This pocket accumulates a certain quantity of the particulate material which serves as a pad to absorb the blow of the subsequent material to reduce the erosive effects thereof as shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,387,914 and 5,060,984.
Conventional valves are also known to create turbulence and a pressure drop between the inlet and the outlet. Robert H. Welker, the inventor herein and the inventor of U.S. Pat. No. 5,730,416, has developed various approaches to deal with valve induced turbulence. In another patent, U.S. Pat. No. 5,769,388, Mr. Welker has developed a plurality of vanes and passageways in the valve to reduce turbulence. The apparatus shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,769,388 has certain shortcomings because of the short discharge nozzle which tapered at an included angle of approximately 12°. There is still a need to reduce turbulence in elbows, in valves and in piping systems in general.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention can be used as a 90° elbow in piping systems to reduce turbulence and promote laminar flow. It can also be used in conjunction with a fire hydrant. The elbow is connected to an inlet conduit and an outlet conduit. The elbow includes three primary components: a flow conditioner, a transition zone, and an elongate tapered discharge nozzle. The discharge nozzle should have a taper with an included angle of about 5°-7.5° measured from the circular outlet of the tapered discharge nozzle. If the discharge nozzle tapers at a 7° included angle, it will have a length of about four times the diameter of the inlet conduit.
The flow conditioner includes a plurality of vanes defining a plurality of passageways to guide the fluid flow from the inlet into the transition zone. The purpose of the guide vanes is to reduce turbulence and promote a streamlined and/or laminar flow as the fluid turns a 90° corner. The flow conditioner can be fabricated as a replaceable part to facilitate maintenance of the elbow. In an alternative embodiment, the individual vanes can be replaceable to facilitate maintenance and prolong the life of the valve. The transition zone includes a curved outer wall extending from the side wall of the flow conditioner, the transition zone being in fluid communication with the tapered discharge nozzle.
The elbow can be used in piping systems with liquids, gases, and steam, as well as two-phase flow, three-phase flow, and dry particulate and granules.


REFERENCES:
patent: Re. 32197 (1986-07-01), Self
patent: 1539435 (1925-05-01), Schurtz
patent: 1570907 (1926-01-01), McKee
patent: 2198730 (1940-04-01), Kadenacy
patent: 2359579 (1944-10-01), Peck
patent: 2884956 (1959-05-01), Perlin
patent: 3157200 (1964-11-01), Rowan
patent: 3170483 (1965-02-01), Milroy
patent: 3207484 (1965-09-01), Rubin
patent: 3271845 (1966-09-01), Breher
patent: 3381713 (1968-05-01), Jacobsen
patent: 3451404 (1969-06-01), Self
patent: 3602261 (1971-08-01), Brown et al.
patent: 3602262 (1971-08-01), Henden
patent: 3630229 (1971-12-01), Nagel et al.
patent: 3709245 (1973-01-01), O'Connor, Jr.
patent: 3746049 (1973-07-01), O'Connor, Jr.
patent: 3776278 (1973-12-01), Allen
patent: 3917222 (1975-11-01), Kay et al.
patent: 3920044 (1975-11-01), Gruner
patent: 3990475 (1976-11-01), Myers
patent: 4022423 (1977-05-01), O'Connor, et al.
patent: 4068683 (1978-01-01), Self
patent: 4085774 (1978-04-01), Baumann
patent: 4279274 (1981-07-01), Seger
patent: 4473210 (1984-09-01), Brighton
patent: 4534388 (1985-08-01), Pall et al.
patent: 4614440 (1986-09-01), King
patent: 4617963 (1986-10-01), Stares
patent: 4758098 (1988-07-01), Meyer
patent: 4929088 (1990-05-01), Smith
patent: 5014746 (1991-05-01), Heymann
patent: 5054521 (1991-10-01), Hendrick
patent: 5063954 (1991-11-01), Hendrick
patent: 5070909 (1991-12-01), Davenport
patent: 5074333 (1991-12-01), Martin
patent: 5307830 (1994-05-01), Welker
patent: 5454640 (1995-10-01), Welker
patent: 5730416 (1998-03-01), Welker
patent: 5769388 (1998-06-01), Welker
patent: 2810118 (1979-09-01), None
patent: 0 097 312 (1984-01-01), None
patent: 59140973 (1984-08-01), None
Pipe Line & Gas Industry magazine; “New gas-pressure regulator blends features of boots, plugs”, May 1999; pp. 59-71.
Fisher-Rosemount; “Type EZR Pressure Reducing Regulator,” Bulletin 71.2:EZR; Jan. 1999; pp. 1-24.
Fisher Controls; “Cavitrol V Trim,” Bulletin 80.2:020; May 1979; pp. 1-4.
Fisher-Rosemount; “CAvitrol III-Stage Trim,” Bulletin 80.1:010; 1997; pp. 1-6.
American Meter Company; “Radkal Flow Valves”; Aug. 1997; pp. 1-16.
Mooney Controls; “2-Flanged Single Port Flowgrid Valve”; 1991; pp. 1-6.
Fisher-Rosemount; “WhisperFlo Trim” 1997; pp. 1-10.
Fisher-Rosemount; “WhisperFlor Aerodynamic Attenuation Trims,” Bull

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Flow diffuser does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Flow diffuser, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Flow diffuser will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2460836