Prosthesis (i.e. – artificial body members) – parts thereof – or ai – Arterial prosthesis – Stent structure
Reexamination Certificate
2001-10-09
2003-10-21
Thaler, Michael H. (Department: 3731)
Prosthesis (i.e., artificial body members), parts thereof, or ai
Arterial prosthesis
Stent structure
C623S001150
Reexamination Certificate
active
06635084
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to stents for implanting into a living body.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Various stems are known in the art wherein, for the present application, the term “stent” indicates a device, made of body-compatible material, which is utilized to widen a blood vessel, or other orifice in the body, and to maintain the resultant size of the lumen. Typically, the stent is delivered to the desired location in the body with an inflatable balloon and, when the balloon is inflated, the stem expands, thereby widening the orifice. Other mechanical devices which cause expansion of the stent are also utilized.
Exemplary patents in the field of stents formed of wire are: U.S. Pat. No. 5,019,090 to Pinchuk, U.S. Pat. No. 5,161,547 to Tower, U.S. Pat. No. 4,950,227 to Savin, et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,314,472 to Fontaine, U.S. Pat No. 4,886,062 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,969,458 to Wiktor and U.S. Pat. No. 4,856,516 to Hillstead. Stems formed of cut stock metal are described in: U.S. Pat. No. 4,733,665 to Palmaz, U.S. Pat. No. 4,762,128 to Rosenbluth, U.S. Pat. No. 5,102,417 to Palmaz and Schatz, U.S. Pat. No. 5,195,984 to Schatz and WO 91FR013820 to Meadox.
The stents described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,102,417 to Palmaz and Schatz have expandable tubular grafts connected together with a flexible connector. The grafts are formed of a plurality of slots disposed parallel to the longitudinal axis of the tube. The flexible connectors are helical connectors. Since the tubular grafts are relatively rigid, the flexible connectors are needed so that the stents can bend when being fed through a curved blood vessel. When the stents of U.S. Pat. No. 5,102,417 expand, the grafts expand radially and, consequently, shrink longitudinally. However, at the same time, the helical connectors twist. The twisting motion is most probably harmful to the blood vessel.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,195,984 to Schatz describes a similar stent but with one straight connector, parallel to the longitudinal axis of the tubular grafts, between tubular grafts. The straight member removes the twisting motion; however, it is not a very strong connector.
SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
In accordance with embodiments of the present invention, a stent for implanting in the body to hold open a blood vessel, includes a body-compatible metal mesh defining a tube having adjacent contiguous cells, the cells having walls which are also the walls of adjacent cells. Each of the plurality of cells includes a pair of facing loops, each facing loop having a curved apex generally aligned along the longitudinal axis. Each facing loop has a first end and a second end that are generally aligned along the circumferential axis, each of the facing loops adapted to open further upon radial expansion of the stent which tends to foreshorten the stent longitudinally. Each of the plurality of cells further includes a pair of curved flexible links which connect the adjacent ends of the pair of facing loops to complete each of the plurality of cells, the pair of curved flexible links made of a metal which, upon expansion of the stent, bend to substantially offset foreshortening along the longitudinal axis.
The pair of facing loops and the curved flexible links are disposed and adapted to cooperate so that the tube, when unexpended, can flex as it is moved through curved blood vessels to a site where it is to be expanded and so that, when the stent is expanded in a curved vessel, at that site, as compared to each other, cells on the outside of the curve are open in length, but narrow in width as compared to cells on the inside of the curve which are short in length but increased in width. This results in a more constant stent cell area between the inside and the outside of the curve than would otherwise occur. Consequently, when the stent is coated with a medicine the compensation results in a more even dose being applied to the inside wall of the lumen, avoiding the possibility that a toxic dose is supplied at one area while a less than effective dose is applied to another area.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4733665 (1988-03-01), Palmaz
patent: 4739762 (1988-04-01), Palmaz
patent: 4762128 (1988-08-01), Rosenbluth
patent: 4776337 (1988-10-01), Palmaz
patent: 4800882 (1989-01-01), Gianturco
patent: 4830003 (1989-05-01), Wolff et al.
patent: 4856516 (1989-08-01), Hillstead
patent: 4886062 (1989-12-01), Wiktor
patent: 4922905 (1990-05-01), Strecker
patent: 4950227 (1990-08-01), Savin et al.
patent: 4969458 (1990-11-01), Wiktor
patent: 4994071 (1991-02-01), MacGregor
patent: 5019085 (1991-05-01), Hillstead
patent: 5019090 (1991-05-01), Pinchuk
patent: 5035706 (1991-07-01), Giantureo
patent: 5102417 (1992-04-01), Palmaz
patent: 5104404 (1992-04-01), Wolff
patent: 5116365 (1992-05-01), Hillstead
patent: 5133732 (1992-07-01), Wiktor
patent: 5158548 (1992-10-01), Lau et al.
patent: 5161547 (1992-11-01), Tower
patent: 5195984 (1993-03-01), Schatz
patent: 5268534 (1993-12-01), Gailey et al.
patent: 5282824 (1994-02-01), Gianturco
patent: 5292331 (1994-03-01), Boneau
patent: 5314472 (1994-05-01), Fontaine
patent: 5330500 (1994-07-01), Song
patent: 5354308 (1994-10-01), Simon et al.
patent: 5354309 (1994-10-01), Schepp et al.
patent: 5383892 (1995-01-01), Cardon et al.
patent: 5405377 (1995-04-01), Cragg
patent: 5421955 (1995-06-01), Lau et al.
patent: 5441515 (1995-08-01), Khosravi et al.
patent: 5443496 (1995-08-01), Schwartz et al.
patent: 5449373 (1995-09-01), Pinchasik
patent: 5507767 (1996-04-01), Maeda et al.
patent: 5514093 (1996-05-01), Ellis et al.
patent: 5540712 (1996-07-01), Kleshinski et al.
patent: 5554181 (1996-09-01), Das
patent: 5593442 (1997-01-01), Klein
patent: 5643312 (1997-07-01), Fischell et al.
patent: 5649952 (1997-07-01), Lam
patent: 5651174 (1997-07-01), Schwartz et al.
patent: 5653727 (1997-08-01), Wiktor
patent: 5733303 (1998-03-01), Israel et al.
patent: 5843120 (1998-12-01), Israel et al.
patent: 5879370 (1999-03-01), Fischell et al.
patent: 5972018 (1999-10-01), Israel et al.
patent: 6156052 (2000-12-01), Richter et al.
patent: 6193747 (2001-02-01), van Oepen
patent: 6461380 (2002-10-01), Cox
patent: 0 335 341 (1989-04-01), None
patent: 0 335 341 (1989-10-01), None
patent: 0 378 151 (1990-07-01), None
patent: 0 421 729 (1991-04-01), None
patent: 0 540 290 (1993-05-01), None
patent: 0 540 290 (1993-05-01), None
patent: 0 541 443 (1993-05-01), None
patent: 0 566 807 (1993-10-01), None
patent: 0 566 807 (1993-10-01), None
patent: 0 606 165 (1994-07-01), None
patent: 0 669 114 (1998-06-01), None
patent: 0 846 447 (1998-06-01), None
patent: 1 181 901 (2002-12-01), None
patent: WO 94/03127 (1994-02-01), None
patent: WO 95/26695 (1995-10-01), None
patent: WO 95/31945 (1995-11-01), None
patent: WO 96/03092 (1996-02-01), None
patent: WO 96/33671 (1996-10-01), None
Trial Transcript,Scimed Life Systems, Inc. et al. and Medinol Ltd.v.Johnson&Johnson, et al., Civil Action No. 99-904-SLR pp. 1-2246.
Trial Transcript, Civil Action No. 99-904-SLR, pp. 2247-2256 (Reading of Jury Verdict).
Jury Verdict, Civil Action No. 99-904-SLR, pp. 2247-2256.
Docket, Civil Action No. 99-904-SLR.
Defendants' Motion for Leave to File an Amended Answer and Counterclaim, Civil Action No. 99-904-SLR.
Plaintiffs' Answering Brief in Opposition to Defendant' Motion for Leave to File an Amended Answer and Counterclaim, Civil Action No. 99-904-SLR.
Appendix to Plaintiffs' Answering Brief in Opposition to Defendant' Motion for Leave to File an Amended Answer and Counterclaim, Civil Action No. 99-904-SLR.
Reply Brief in Support of Defendant' Motion for Leave to File an Amended Answer and Counterclaim, Civil Action No. 99-904-SLR.
Order of Aug. 15, 2001, Civil Action No. 99-904-SLR (relating to claim construction).
Memorandum Opinion of Aug. 15, 2001, Civil Action No. 99-904-SLR (decisions on summary judgment motions of non-infringment and validity).
Order of Aug. 15, 2001, Civil Action No. 99-904-SLR (orders regarding decisions on summary judgment motions of non-infringment and validity).
Second Supplemental IDS Letter, filed
Israel Henry Marshall
Pinchasik Gregory
Medinol Ltd.
Morgan & Finnegan , LLP
Thaler Michael H.
LandOfFree
Flexible expandable stent does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Flexible expandable stent, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Flexible expandable stent will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3130802