Filtered email differentiation

Electrical computers and digital processing systems: multicomput – Computer conferencing – Demand based messaging

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C709S224000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07610341

ABSTRACT:
The present disclosure provides systems and methods for removing an undesired email message. Some embodiments comprise providing detection mechanisms for detecting undesired email messages from an email service of a user. Accordingly, a user interface may be provided to display an identification of an undesired email message in a particular visual manner that is associated with a particular detection mechanism. Other systems and methods are also provided.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5944787 (1999-08-01), Zoken
patent: 5999932 (1999-12-01), Paul
patent: 6023723 (2000-02-01), McCormick et al.
patent: 6052709 (2000-04-01), Paul
patent: 6161130 (2000-12-01), Horvitz et al.
patent: 6192360 (2001-02-01), Dumais et al.
patent: 6249805 (2001-06-01), Fleming
patent: 6266692 (2001-07-01), Greenstein
patent: 6321267 (2001-11-01), Donaldson
patent: 6442588 (2002-08-01), Clark et al.
patent: 6480885 (2002-11-01), Olivier
patent: 6654787 (2003-11-01), Aronson et al.
patent: 6654800 (2003-11-01), Rieger
patent: 6708205 (2004-03-01), Sheldon et al.
patent: 6732157 (2004-05-01), Gordon et al.
patent: 6748403 (2004-06-01), Lemke
patent: 6757740 (2004-06-01), Parekh et al.
patent: 6763462 (2004-07-01), Marsh
patent: 6769016 (2004-07-01), Rothwell et al.
patent: 6779021 (2004-08-01), Bates et al.
patent: 6782510 (2004-08-01), Gross et al.
patent: 6842773 (2005-01-01), Ralston et al.
patent: 6847931 (2005-01-01), Addison et al.
patent: 6854014 (2005-02-01), Amin et al.
patent: 6925454 (2005-08-01), Lam et al.
patent: 6941466 (2005-09-01), Mastrianni
patent: 6968571 (2005-11-01), Devine et al.
patent: 7007080 (2006-02-01), Wilson
patent: 7051077 (2006-05-01), Lin
patent: 7117358 (2006-10-01), Bandini et al.
patent: 7155484 (2006-12-01), Malik
patent: 7155608 (2006-12-01), Malik
patent: 7159149 (2007-01-01), Spiegel et al.
patent: 7165239 (2007-01-01), Hejlsberg et al.
patent: 7188173 (2007-03-01), Anderson et al.
patent: 7249162 (2007-07-01), Rounthwaite et al.
patent: 7272853 (2007-09-01), Goodman et al.
patent: 7451184 (2008-11-01), Malik
patent: 7506031 (2009-03-01), Malik
patent: 2001/0054101 (2001-12-01), Wilson
patent: 2002/0013692 (2002-01-01), Chandhok et al.
patent: 2002/0049806 (2002-04-01), Gatz et al.
patent: 2002/0059454 (2002-05-01), Barrett et al.
patent: 2002/0065828 (2002-05-01), Goodspeed
patent: 2002/0073233 (2002-06-01), Gross et al.
patent: 2002/0107712 (2002-08-01), Lam
patent: 2002/0116641 (2002-08-01), Mastrianni
patent: 2002/0199095 (2002-12-01), Bandini
patent: 2003/0097409 (2003-05-01), Tsai
patent: 2003/0097410 (2003-05-01), Atkins et al.
patent: 2003/0144842 (2003-07-01), Addison
patent: 2003/0172020 (2003-09-01), Davies et al.
patent: 2003/0172196 (2003-09-01), Hejlsberg
patent: 2003/0233418 (2003-12-01), Goldman
patent: 2004/0015554 (2004-01-01), Wilson
patent: 2004/0039786 (2004-02-01), Horvitz et al.
patent: 2004/0054733 (2004-03-01), Weeks
patent: 2004/0054741 (2004-03-01), Weatherby et al.
patent: 2004/0064537 (2004-04-01), Anderson
patent: 2004/0073617 (2004-04-01), Miliken et al.
patent: 2004/0088359 (2004-05-01), Simpson
patent: 2004/0093384 (2004-05-01), Shipp
patent: 2004/0107189 (2004-06-01), Burdick
patent: 2004/0117451 (2004-06-01), Chung
patent: 2004/0123153 (2004-06-01), Wright et al.
patent: 2004/0167964 (2004-08-01), Rounthwaite
patent: 2004/0181581 (2004-09-01), Kosco
patent: 2004/0193606 (2004-09-01), Arai et al.
patent: 2005/0022008 (2005-01-01), Goodman
patent: 2005/0050150 (2005-03-01), Dinkin
patent: 2008/0256210 (2008-10-01), Malik
Cecil Williams, “Effective Spam Filtering with Eudora—The Filters”, Aug. 6, 2003, Web page retreived from The Internet Archive Wayback Machine, available at: http://web.archive.org/web/20030806181316/http://www.cecilw.com/eudora/filters.htm.
SpamXpress, “spamXpress—anti-spam Rules/Filters for Outlook Express”, Jun. 2, 2003, Web page retreived from The Internet Archive Wayback Machine, available at: http://web.archive.org/web/20030602073212/http://www.spamxpress.com/.
Houten-Kemp; “E-Mail Glossary”, Everything E-mail, Internet Mail Services Netowrk, Inc ., Ipswich, MA; copyright 1997-1999; 3 pages.
Oracle; “How Does eMail Server Work?”, Oracle eMail Server Understanding and Planning Guide, Release 5.1, copyright 2000; 13 pages.
IATS Computing Knowledge Base; “How does Email Work?”, University of Missouri, Columbia; Aug. 16, 2000; 4 pages.
Coleman; “How Does Email Work?”, Yale University Library Workstation Support Group; Mar. 18, 1997; 4 pages.
Brain; “The Simplicity of E-mail”, How E-mail Works, Marshall Brian's How Stuff Works; copyright 1998-2001; 1 page.
Brain; “Understanding a Simple E-mail Server?”, How E-mail Works, Marshall Brian's How Stuff Works; copyright 1998-2001; 2 pages.
Brain; “Understanding Attachments?”, How E-mail Works, Marshall Brian's How Stuff Works; copyright 1998-2001; 2 pages.
Brain; “Understanding E-mail Clients?”, How E-Mail Works, Marshall Brian's How Stuff Works; copyright 1998-2001; 2 pages.
Brain; “Understanding SMTP?”,How E-mail Works, Marshall Brian's How Stuff Works; copyright 1998-2001; 1 page.
Brain; “Understanding the POP3 Server?”, How E-mail Works, Marshall Brian's How Stuff Works; copyright 1998-2001; 2 pages.
Brain; “Understanding the Real E-mail System?”, How E-mail Works, Marshall Brian's How Stuff Works; copyright 1998-2001; 3 pages.
Brain; “What is an E-mail Message?”, How E-Mail Works, Marshall Brian's How Stuff Works; copyright 1998-2001; 2 pages.
Graham; “A Plan for Spam”; www.paulgraham.com/spam.html; printed Jun. 26, 2003; pp. 1-13.
Graham; “Better Bayesian Filtering”; www.paulgraham.com/better.html; printed Jun. 26, 2003; pp. 1-13.
Rivest; “The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm”, Internet RFC 1321; Apr. 1992; 21 pages.
Uuencode and MIME FAQ; http://web.archive.org/web/20021217052047/http://userrs.rcn.com/wussery/attach.html. pp. 1 and 2; printed Oct. 19, 2007.
Malik; U.S. Appl. No. 10/005,641, filed Dec. 5, 2001.
Malik; U.S. Appl. No. 10/610,736, filed Jun. 30, 2003.
Malik; U.S. Appl. No. 10/687,439, filed Oct. 14, 2003.
Malik; U.S. Appl. No. 10/685,558, filed Oct. 14, 2003.
Daniell; U.S. Appl. No. 10/685,656, filed Oct. 14, 2003.
Daniell; U.S. Appl. No. 10/686,293, filed Oct. 14, 2003.
Daniell; U.S. Appl. No. 11/245,888, filed Oct. 7, 2005.
Malik; U.S. Appl. No. 11/466,948, filed Aug. 24, 2006.
Malik; U.S. Appl. No. 11/609,164, filed Dec. 11, 2006.
Malik; Non-Final Rejection mailed May 16, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/005,641, filed Dec. 5, 2001.
Malik; Final Rejection mailed Nov. 15, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/005,641, filed Dec. 5, 2001.
Malik; Non-Final Rejection mailed May 5, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/005,641, filed Dec. 5, 2001.
Malik; Notice of Allowance and Fees Due mailed Oct. 17, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/005,641, filed Dec. 5, 2001.
Malik; Non-Final Rejection mailed Nov. 12, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/610,736, filed Jun. 30, 2003.
Malik; Examiner Interview Summary Record mailed Dec. 21, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/610,736, filed Jun. 30, 2003.
Malik; Final Rejection mailed May 25, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/610,736, filed Jun. 30, 2003.
Malik; Non-Final Rejection mailed Nov. 25, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/610,736, filed Jun. 30, 2003.
Malik; Non-Final Rejection mailed Nov. 30, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/610,736, filed Jun. 30, 2003.
Malik; Final Rejection mailed Apr. 11, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/610,736, filed Jun. 30, 2003.
Malik; Examiner Interview Summary Record mailed Jun. 1, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/610,736, filed Jun. 30, 2003.
Malik; Examiner Interview Summary Record mailed Jul. 6, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/610,736, filed Jun. 30, 2003.
Malik; Notice of Allowance and Fees Due mailed Jul. 6, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/610,736, filed Jun. 30, 2003.
Malik; Non-Final Rejection mailed May 18, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/687,439, filed Oct. 14, 2003.
Malik; Final Rejection mailed Oct. 4, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/687

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Filtered email differentiation does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Filtered email differentiation, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Filtered email differentiation will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4117343

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.