Fast plant test for model-based control

Data processing: generic control systems or specific application – Generic control system – apparatus or process – Optimization or adaptive control

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C700S028000, C700S038000, C700S039000, C702S108000, C702S110000

Reexamination Certificate

active

10225675

ABSTRACT:
A method and apparatus for designing perturbation signals to excite a number of input variables of a system, in order to test that system for the purpose of obtaining models for the synthesis of a model-based controller. The method begins with providing input parameters of the system. A plurality of binary multi-frequency (BMF) signals are generated based on these input parameters and the frequency spectra of these BMF signals are calculated. One BMF signal is selected out of the set of BMF signals so that the frequency spectrum of the selected BMF signal most closely matches a desired frequency spectrum specified by the input parameters. The selected BMF signal is used as a first perturbation signal for testing the system. The selected BMF signal is also shifted by predetermined amounts of samples to create delayed copies of the original BMF signal to be used as additional perturbation signals.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4686655 (1987-08-01), Hyatt
patent: 5162723 (1992-11-01), Marzalek et al.
patent: 5315538 (1994-05-01), Borrell et al.
patent: 5471880 (1995-12-01), Lang et al.
patent: 5511431 (1996-04-01), Hinton
patent: 2001/0014834 (2001-08-01), Shah
patent: 131 118 (1978-07-01), None
patent: 240 791 1 (1986-12-01), None
European Search Report dated Jan. 3, 2004.
M. R. Buckner and T. W. Kerlin. Optimum binary signals for reactor frequency response imeasurements.Nucl. Sci. Eng., 49:255-262, 1972.
J. E. J. Dennis and R. B. Schnabel.Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Optimization and Non-linear Equations. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1983.
W. A. Docter.Order Reduction of Nonlinear Dynamic Models by Subspace Identification and Strategies Regression. PhD thesis, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, 1999.
K. Godfrey, editor.Perturbation Signals for System Identification. Prentice Hall International (UK) Limited, 1994.
S. L. Harris and D. A. Mellichamp. On-line identification of process dynamics: use of multifrequency binary signals.Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development, 19:166-176, 1980.
I. A. Henderson and J. McGhee. Compact symmetrical binary codes for system identification.Mathl. Comput. Modelling, 14:213-218, 1990.
C. Koung and J. F. MacGregor. Identification for robust multivariable control: the design of experiments.Automatica, 30:1541-1554, 1994.
L. Ljung.System Identification: Theory for the User. Prentice-Hall Information and System Sciences Series. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1987.
K. D. Paehlike and H. Rake. Binary multifrequency signals—synthesis and application. In5IFAC Symposium on Identification and System Parameter Estimation, pp. 589-596, Darmstadt, Sep. 1979.
T. Söderström and P. Stoica.System Identification. Prentice Hall International Series in Systems and Control Engineering. Prentice Hall, New York, 1989.
A. Van den Bos. Construction of binary multifrequency test signals. In1stIFAC Symposium on Identification in Automatic Control Systems, Prague, Jun. 1967.
A. Van den Bos. Estimation of linear system coefficients from noisy responses to binary multifrequency test signals. In2ndIFAC Symposium on Identification and Process Parameter Estimation, Prague, Jun. 1970.
A. Van den Bos and R. G. Krol. Synthesis of discrete-interval binary signals with specific Fourier amplitude spectra.International Journal of Control, 30:871-884, 1979.
E. van der Ourderaa, J. Schoukens, and J. Renneboog. Peak factor minimization using a time-frequency domain swapping algorithm.IEEE Trans. on Instrum. Meas., IM-37:145-147, 1988.
Q. Zhan and C. Georgakis. Multivariable Input Signal Design for Process Identification. InThe 30thIndustrial Advisory Committee Meeting, Lehigh University, PA, 10 1999.
Y. Zhu. Multivariable process identification for mpc: the asymptotic method and its applications.J. Proc. Com., 6(2);101-113, 1998.
N. Zierler. Linear recurring sequences.Journal Soc. Ind. Appl. Math., 7:31-48, 1959.
L. W. Bezanson and S. L. Harris. Identification and Control of an Extender using Multivariable Algorithms.IEEE Proceedings, 133(4):145-152, Jul. 1986.
S. Boyden,DMCplus™ 1.1-Multivariable Control Software—Training Course Slides—Reference Notes. Aspen Technology, Inc., Houston, TX, Jun. 1999.
B. J. Cott. Introduction to the Process Identification Workshop at the 1992 Canadian Chemical Engineering Conference.Journal of Process Control, 5(2):67-69, 1995.
B. J. Cott. Summary of the Process Identification Workshop at the 1992 Canadian Chemical Engineering Conference.Journal of Process Control, 5(2):109-113, 1995.
S. V. Gaikwad and D. E. Rivera. Integrated Identification and Control for Model Predictive Controllers. InAiChE Meeting, San Francisco, CA, Nov. 1994. Session: Model Prredictive Control, paper 227a.
I. Kollár.Frequency Domain System Identification Toolbox User Guide. The MathWorks, Inc., MA, 1995.
T. Li and C. Georgakis. Design of Multivariable Identification Signals for Constrained Systems. InChemical Process Modeling and Control Research Center—32ndIndustrial Advisory Committee Meeting, Lehigh University, Bethelhem, PA, Oct. 2000.
L. Ljung. Identification for Control—What is there to learn? Technical Report LiTH-ISY-R-1996, Linköping University, Department of Electrical Engineering, Linköping, Sweden, Jan. 1998.
D. E. Rivera. Principles of System Identification. Arizona State University, College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Tempe, AZ, Jan. 1999. Short course notes.
D. E. Rivera, J. F. Pollard, and C. E. Garcia. Control-Relevant Parameter Estimation via Prediction-Error Methods: Implications for Digital PID and QDMC Control. InAIChE Meeting, Chicago, IL, Nov. 1990. Session: Model Predictive control, paper 4a.
Q. Zhan. Multivariable Test Signal Design and Constrained Identification for the Process Industry. Technical report, Lehigh University, Department of Chemical Engineering, Bethelehem, PA, Mar. 1999. Candidacy Report.
European Search Report dated Jan. 3, 2004.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Fast plant test for model-based control does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Fast plant test for model-based control, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Fast plant test for model-based control will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3743264

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.