Family of high affinity, modified antibodies for cancer...

Organic compounds -- part of the class 532-570 series – Organic compounds – Carbohydrates or derivatives

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C530S387100, C530S387300, C530S388800, C530S391100, C435S069100, C435S070210, C435S326000, C435S328000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06207815

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to the field of immunogiobulin production and modifications to naturally occurring antibody amino acid sequences. Specifically, the invention relates to using recombinant DNA techniques to produce chimeric genes and to take advantage of these gene modification techniques to construct chimeric antibodies.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Antibodies are specific immunoglobulin (Ig) polypeptides produced by the vertebrate immune system in response to challenges by foreign proteins, glycoproteins, cells, or other antigenic foreign substances. The sequence of events which permits the organism to overcome invasion by foreign cells or to rid the system of foreign substances is at least partially understood. An important part of this process is the manufacture of antibodies which bind specifically to a particular foreign substance. The binding specificity of such polypeptides to a particular antigen is highly refined, and the multitude of specificities capable of being generated by the individual vertebrate is remarkable in its complexity and variability. Millions of antigens are capable of eliciting antibody responses, each antibody almost exclusively directed to the particular antigen which elicited it.
Two major sources of vertebrate antibodies are presently utilized—generation in situ by the mammalian B lymphocytes, and generation in cell culture by B-cell hybrids. Antibodies are generated in situ as a result of the differentiation of immature B lymphocytes into plasma cells, which occurs in response to stimulation by specific antigens. In the undifferentiated B cells, the portions of DNA coding for the various regions on the immunoglobulin chains are separated in the genomic DNA. The sequences are assembled sequentially prior to expression. A review of this process has been given by Gough,
Trends in Biochem Sci,
6:203 (1981).
The resulting rearranged gene is capable of expression in the mature B lymphocyte to produce the desired antibody. However, even when a particular mammal is exposed to only a single antigen a uniform population of antibodies does not result. The in situ immune response to any particular antigen is defined by the mosaic of responses to the various determinants which are present on the antigen. Each subset of homologous antibodies is contributed by a single population of B cells—hence in situ generation of antibodies is “polyclonal”.
This limited but inherent heterogeneity has been overcome in numerous particular cases by use of hybridoma technology to create “monoclonal” antibodies in cell cultures by B cell hybridomas [See Kohler and Milstein,
Nature
256:495-497 (1975)].
In this process, the relatively short-lived, or mortal, splenocytes or lymphocytes from a mammal which has been injected with antigen are fused with an immortal tumor cell line, thus producing hybrid cells or “hybridomas” which are both immortal and capable of producing the genetically coded antibody of the B cell. The hybrids thus formed are segregated into single genetic strains by selection, dilution, and regrowth, and each strain thus represents a single genetic line. They therefore, produce antibodies which are assured to be homogeneous against a desired antigen. These antibodies, referencing their pure genetic parentage, are called “monoclonal”.
Monoclonal antibodies with mono-specificity have greatly influenced immunology, and their usefulness has already been demonstrated in such sciences as biology, pharmacology, chemistry and others. Such monoclonal antibodies have found widespread use not only as diagnostics reagents [see, for example,
Immunology for the
80
's
, Eds. Voller et al., MTP Press, Lancaster, (1981), but also therapy (see, for example, Ritz and Schlossman,
Blood,
59:1-11, (1982)].
Monoclonal antibodies produced by hybridomas, while theoretically effective as discussed above and clearly preferable to polyclonal antibodies because of their specificity, suffer from an important disadvantage. In many applications, the use of monoclonal antibodies produced in non-human animals is severely restricted where the monoclonal antibodies are to be used in humans. Repeated injections of a “foreign” antibody in humans, such as a mouse antibody, may lead to harmful hypersensitivity reactions. Such a non-human derived monoclonal antibody, when injected into humans, causes a anti-nonhuman antibody (ANHA) response. For a discussion of a specific ANHA response caused by using murine-derived antibodies, human anti-mouse antibody (HAMA) response, see Shawler et al.,
Journal of Immunology,
135:1530-1535 (1985).
It is believed that animal immunoglobulins having human constant regions will generate less of an ANHA response when injected into humans than animal immunoglobulins having nonhuman constant regions. As such, monoclonal antibodies having good binding affinities for selected antigens and having human constant regions are thought to possess great potential utility for immunological diagnosis and therapy of human patients with cancer.
Various attempts have so far been made to manufacture human-derived monoclonal antibodies by using human hybridomas. For example, human-human hybridomas [Olsson et al.,
Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.
(
USA
), 77:5429 (1980)]; human-murine hybridomas [(Schlom et al.,
Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.
(
USA
), 77:6841 (1980)] and several other xenogenic hybrid combinations have been prepared. Human monoclonal antibodies have also been produced by transformation of lymphocytes using Epstein-Barr virus. However, such hybridomas may potentially harbor pathogenic human viruses. Alternatively, primary, antibody producing B cells have been immortalized in vitro by transformation with viral DNA. Unfortunately, yields of monoclonal antibodies from human hybridoma cell lines are relatively low (1 ug/mL in human compared to 100 ug/mL in mouse hybridomas), and production costs are high.
While human immunoglobulins are highly desirable in immunological diagnosis and therapy of human cancer patients, human hybridoma techniques have not yet reached the stage where human monoclonal antibodies with required antigenic specificities can be easily obtained. In addition, for obvious ethical reasons, researchers can not immunize human subjects with selected toxic or otherwise deleterious antigens to generate antibodies against the specific antigen. This imposes great restrictions an immunological diagnosis highly desirable. A method to overcome this difficulty is to artificially create an antibody which is very similar to a human antibody and is not recognized as a foreign substance within the human body, i.e., a chimeric, or “humanized” antibody.
Typically in chimeric antibodies, the variable region of both light and heavy chains mimics the variable regions of antibodies derived from one species of mammals, while the constant portions are homologous to the sequences in antibodies derived from humans. One clear advantage to such chimeric forms is that, for example, the variable regions can conveniently be derived from presently known sources using readily available hybridomas of B cells from non-human host organisms in combination with constant regions derived from, for example, human cell preparations. While the specificity of the variable region is not affected by its source, the constant region being human, is less likely to elicit an immune response from a human subject when the antibodies are injected than would the constant region from a non-human source.
One known human tumor antigen is tumor-associated glycoprotein (TAG-72). TAG-72 is associated with the surface of certain tumor cells of human origin, specifically the LS174T tumor cell line. LS174T [American Type Culture Collection (herein ATCC) No. CL 188] is a variant of the LS180 (ATCC No. CL 187) colon adenocarcinoma line.
The karyotype of LS174T is similar to that of LS180 with a missing X chromosome in a majority of the cells. Data has been presented as described in Johnson et al.,
Cancer Res.,
46:850-857 (1986), to characterize th

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Family of high affinity, modified antibodies for cancer... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Family of high affinity, modified antibodies for cancer..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Family of high affinity, modified antibodies for cancer... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2444591

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.