Fabricated torque shaft

Details Fabricated torque shaft Fabricated torque shaft

2000-11-08

2002-10-01

Look, Edward K. (Department: 3745)

Rotary kinetic fluid motors or pumps

Selectively adjustable vane or working fluid control means

Upstream of runner

C415S150000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06457937

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a torque shaft assembly and, more particularly, to a torque shaft assembled from easily machined parts, with arms that are oriented one to another so that they move different stages of vanes in an optimal fashion.
The key to increased engine performance is increased engine overall pressure ratio. Engine overall pressure ratio is established in the compressor. The key to increased pressure ratio in an advanced compressor is to provide numerous stages of movable compressor vanes whose angles may be varied as the compressor is brought up to speed in order to prevent a condition called “stall”. Compressor “stall” is detrimental to the service life and condition of the compressor. Each stage of vanes may have optimal angle schedules that are different one from another, often in non-linear interrelationships. Furthermore, the vanes must replicate the desired angle schedule in both the opening and closing direction, which means that deflection of the moving system under actuation loads must be minimized.
Stage
2
is typically termed the master vane stage. The engine controller is typically programmed to monitor Stage
2
, and move the torque shaft so as to move Stage
2
in accordance with a program keyed to engine speed during startup or to effect power turndowns at constant speed when required. A power turndown is used when the power demand on the grid drops such as during lunch time, for example, and the plant operator wishes to keep the turbine-generator set running and synchronized to the grid. The generators cannot be permitted to generate any more power than the amount of power being used by the grid.
When the vane schedule is changed, because of performance requirements or optimization tests, radical changes are usually made to the kinematics of the Variable Guide Vane linkage (VGV) system (referred to by some engineers as Variable Stator Vane (VSV) system). Usually, this means a new torque shaft. Typically torque shafts are cast and then machined to define the torque shaft arm clevis locations.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Certain new engines feature compressors with several stages of movable vanes that have non-linear schedules which necessitate out-of-plane torque shaft arm clevis locations. The out-of-plane torque shaft arm clevis locations make a cast one-piece torque shaft impractical. In addition, the axial spacing of the torque shaft arm clevis locations leave insufficient room to machine a cast torque shaft even if the torque shaft arm clevis locations are in-plane.
Furthermore, the Critical-to-Quality (CTQ) of the VGV system is vane angle accuracy. Accordingly, the present invention provides a torque shaft that addresses the problems associated with VGV systems, and particularly systems in which vanes have non-linear schedules and/or which otherwise preclude or inhibit the manufacture and use of cast, one-piece torque shafts.
The present invention provides a fabricated torque shaft that features a bolt-together design to allow vane schedule revisions with minimal hardware cost. The bolt-together design of the invention further facilitates on-site vane schedule revisions with parts that are comparatively small. The fabricated torque shaft of the invention also accommodates stage schedules that are different one from another in non-linear inter-relationships as well as nonlinear schedules for a particular stage of vanes. The invention also eases machining so as to prevent sag of a long shaft during machining.
Thus, the fabricated torque shaft of the invention is embodied in an assembly comprising a torque shaft main body having a forward end and a rearward end, bearings defined adjacent each end of the shaft main body, and a plurality of arm structures provided at spaced locations along said torque shaft main body for operatively coupling said torque shaft to a plurality of vane stages of a compressor; wherein at least one of the arm structures is detachedly secured to the torque shaft main body so that the at least one arm structure can be removed and replaced with another arm structure.


REFERENCES:
patent: 2819732 (1958-01-01), Paetz
patent: 3487992 (1970-01-01), Pineda
patent: 3779665 (1973-12-01), Tatem et al.
patent: 3873230 (1975-03-01), Norris et al.
patent: 4049360 (1977-09-01), Snell
patent: 4400135 (1983-08-01), Thebert
patent: 4430043 (1984-02-01), Knight et al.
patent: 4618311 (1986-10-01), Miura et al.
patent: 4856962 (1989-08-01), McDow
patent: 4890977 (1990-01-01), Tremaine et al.
patent: 5549448 (1996-08-01), Langston
patent: 6174130 (2001-01-01), King et al.
“39thGE Turbine State-of-the-Art Technology Seminar”, Tab 1, ““F” Technology —the First Half-Million Operating Hours”, H.E. Miller, Aug. 1996.
“39th GE Turbine State-of-the-Art Technology Seminar”, Tab 2, “GE Heavy-Duty Gas Turbine Performance Characteristics”, F. J. Brooks, Aug. 1996.
“39th GE Turbine State-of-the-Art Technology Seminar”, Tab 3, “9EC 50Hz 170-MW Class Gas Turbine”, A. S. Arrao, Aug. 1996.
“39th GE Turbine State-of-the-Art Technology Seminar”, Tab 4, “MWS6001FA—An Advanced-Technology 70-MW Class 50/60 Hz Gas Turbine”, Ramachandran et al., Aug. 1996.
“39th GE Turbine State-of-the-Art Technology Seminar”, Tab 5, “Turbomachinery Technology Advances at Nuovo Pignone”, Benvenuti et al., Aug. 1996.
“39th GE Turbine State-of-the-Art Technology Seminar”, Tab 6, “GE Aeroderivative Gas Turbines—Design and Operating Features”, M.W. Horner, Aug. 1996.
“39th GE Turbine State-of-the-Art Technology Seminar”, Tab 7, “Advance Gas Turbine Materials and Coatings”, P.W. Schilke, Aug. 1996.
“39th GE Turbine State-of-the-Art Technology Seminar”, Tab 8, “Dry Low NOXCombustion Systems for GE Heavy-Duty Turbines”, L. B. Davis, Aug. 1996.
“39th GE Turbine State-of-the-Art Technology Seminar”, Tab 9, “GE Gas Turbine Combustion Flexibility”, M. A. Davi, Aug. 1996.
“39th GE Turbine State-of-the-Art Technology Seminar”, Tab 10, “Gas Fuel Clean-Up System Design Considerations for GE Heavy-Duty Gas Turbines”, C. Wilkes, Aug. 1996.
“39th GE Turbine State-of-the-Art Technology Seminar”, Tab 11, “Integrated Control Systems for Advanced Combined Cycles”, Chu et al., Aug. 1996.
“39th GE Turbine State-of-the-Art Technology Seminar”, Tab 12, “Power Systems for the 21st Century “H” Gas Turbine Combined Cycles”, Paul et al., Aug. 1996.
“39th GE Turbine State-of-the-Art Technology Seminar”, Tab 13, “Clean Coal and Heavy Oil Technologies for Gas Turbines”, D. M. Todd, Aug. 1996.
“39th GE Turbine State-of-the-Art Technology Seminar”, Tab 14, “Gas Turbine Conversions, Modifications and Uprates Technology”, Stuck et al., Aug. 1996.
“39th GE Turbine State-of-the-Art Technology Seminar”, Tab 15, “Performance and Reliability Improvements for Heavy-Duty Gas Turbines,” J. R. Johnston, Aug. 1996.
“39th GE Turbine State-of-the-Art Technology Seminar”, Tab 16, “Gas Turbine Repair Technology”, Crimi et al, Aug. 1996.
“39th GE Turbine State-of-the-Art Technology Seminar”, Tab 17, “Heavy Duty Turbine Operating & Maintenance Considerations”, R. F. Hoeft, Aug. 1996.
“39th GE Turbine State-of-the-Art Technology Seminar”, Tab 18, “Gas Turbine Performance Monitoring and Testing”, Schmitt et al., Aug. 1996.
“39th GE Turbine State-of-the-Art Technology Seminar”, Tab 19, “Monitoring Service Delivery System and Diagnostics”, Madej et al., Aug. 1996.
“39th GE Turbine State-of-the-Art Technology Seminar”, Tab 20, “Steam Turbines for Large Power Applications”, Reinker et al., Aug. 1996.
“39th GE Turbine State-of-the-Art Technology Seminar”, Tab 21, “Steam Turbines for Ultrasupercritical Power Plants”, Retzlaff et al., Aug. 1996.
“39th GE Turbine State-of-the-Art Technology Seminar”, Tab 22, “Steam Turbine Sustained Efficiency”, P. Schofield, Aug. 1996.
“39th GE Turbine State-of-the-Art Technology Seminar”, Tab 23, “Recent Advances in Steam Turbines for Industrial and Cogeneration Applications”, Leger et al., Aug. 1996.
“39th GE Turbine State-of-the-Art Technology Seminar”, Tab 24, “Mechanical Drive Steam Turbines”, D. R. Leger, Aug. 1996.
“39th GE Turbine State-of-the-Art Technology

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Fabricated torque shaft does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Fabricated torque shaft, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Fabricated torque shaft will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2950914