Expert system for testing industrial processes and determining s

Boots – shoes – and leggings

Patent

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

395 50, 395 67, H03K 1900

Patent

active

057610908

ABSTRACT:
A method and system for monitoring both an industrial process and a sensor. The method and system include determining a minimum number of sensor pairs needed to test the industrial process as well as the sensor for evaluating the state of operation of both. The technique further includes generating a first and second signal characteristic of an industrial process variable. After obtaining two signals associated with one physical variable, a difference function is obtained by determining the arithmetic difference between the pair of signals over time. A frequency domain transformation is made of the difference function to obtain Fourier modes describing a composite function. A residual function is obtained by subtracting the composite function from the difference function and the residual function (free of nonwhite noise) is analyzed by a statistical probability ratio test.

REFERENCES:
patent: 3710082 (1973-01-01), Sloane et al.
patent: 3848115 (1974-11-01), Sloane et al.
patent: 4060716 (1977-11-01), Pekrul et al.
patent: 4133039 (1979-01-01), Eichenlaub
patent: 4215340 (1980-07-01), Lejon
patent: 4275447 (1981-06-01), Ruiz
patent: 4292129 (1981-09-01), Barry
patent: 4399095 (1983-08-01), Morris
patent: 4435751 (1984-03-01), Hori et al.
patent: 4598271 (1986-07-01), Wagli et al.
patent: 4611197 (1986-09-01), Sansky
patent: 4627954 (1986-12-01), Leroy et al.
patent: 4658245 (1987-04-01), Dye et al.
patent: 4697170 (1987-09-01), Hoekman
patent: 4707687 (1987-11-01), Thomas et al.
patent: 4707688 (1987-11-01), Thomas
patent: 4715000 (1987-12-01), Premerlani
patent: 4744242 (1988-05-01), Anderson et al.
patent: 4758964 (1988-07-01), Bittner et al.
patent: 4772445 (1988-09-01), Nasrallah et al.
patent: 4783307 (1988-11-01), Galligan et al.
patent: 4803040 (1989-02-01), Gross
patent: 4816208 (1989-03-01), Woods et al.
patent: 4849741 (1989-07-01), Thomas
patent: 4923117 (1990-05-01), Adams et al.
patent: 4977390 (1990-12-01), Saylor et al.
patent: 4990302 (1991-02-01), Oda et al.
patent: 5009833 (1991-04-01), Takeuchi et al.
patent: 5023045 (1991-06-01), Watanabe et al.
patent: 5024801 (1991-06-01), Impink, Jr. et al.
patent: 5103402 (1992-04-01), Morton et al.
patent: 5140858 (1992-08-01), Nishimoto et al.
patent: 5192493 (1993-03-01), Erin et al.
patent: 5214577 (1993-05-01), Sztipanovits et al.
patent: 5223207 (1993-06-01), Gross et al.
patent: 5285457 (1994-02-01), Funakubo et al.
patent: 5319572 (1994-06-01), Wilhelm et al.
patent: 5392320 (1995-02-01), Chao
patent: 5459675 (1995-10-01), Gross et al.
"On-Line Signal Validation and Feedback Control in a Nuclear Reactor," Ray, et al., pp. 38.01-38.09, Mar. 21, 1983.
"Signal Validation with Control Room Information--Processing Computers," Belblidia, et al., Progress in Nuclear Energy, vol. 12, No. 10, pp. 551-558, 1985.
"Expert Systems Application to Plant Diagnosis and Sensor Data Validation," Hashemi, et al., Power Plant Dynamics, Control & Testing Symposium, 6th Proceedings, Apr. 14-16, 1986, Knoxville, Tenn.
"An Expert System for Real-Time Diagnostics and Control," Christie, et al., ANS Topical Meeting on Computer Applications for Nuclear Power Plant Operation and Control, Sep. 1985, pp. 671-676.
"Knowledge-Based Systems in Process Fault Diagnosis," Sudduth, Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 112, 1989, pp. 195-209.
"Condition Monitoring of Machinery Using Motor Current Signature Analysis (MCSA)," Kryter, Sep. 11-14, 1989.
"Spectrum-Transformed Sequential Testing Method for Signal Validation Applications," Gross, et al., 8th Power Plant Dynamics, Control & Testing Symp., Knoxville, Tenn., May 1992.
"Sensor failure detection in dynamical systems by Kalman filtering methodology," Turkcan, Netherlands Energy Research Foundation, The Netherlands & O. Ciftcioglu, Istanbul Technical University, Turkey, Dynamics and Control in Nuclear Power Stations, BNES, London, 1991, pp. 133-139.
"Plant Monitoring and Signal Validation at HFIR," Mullens, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Instrumentation & Controls Div., Oak Ridge, Tenn., pp. 2.01-2.12, May 19-24, 1991.
"An Expert System for Sensor Data Validation & Malfunction Detection." Hashani, et al., presented at American Nuclear Society Topical Meeting, Aug. 31-Sep. 2, 1987, Snowbird, Utah.
"On-Line Test of Signal Validation Software on the Lobi-MOD2 Facility in Ispra, Italy," Prock et al., Nuclear Technology, vol. 97, Jan. 1992, pp. 52-62.
"Spike Energy in Fault Analysis/Machine Condition Monitoring," Shea et al.
"Loose Part Monitor Sensor Validation, Impact Detection, and Characterization," Allen, Nuclear Power Journal, May-Jun. 1989, pp. 80, 82, 84 & 91.
"Reactor Operations" Artificial Intelligence Applications to Improve Nuclear Plant Operations, Quallis, et al., 1988 Winter Meeting, Washington, D.C., International Conference on Nuclear Fission Fifty Years of Process in Energy Security.
"Control and Instrumentation," Upadhyaya, Nuclear Safety, vol. 26, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 1985, pp. 32-42.
"A Methodology for the Design and Analysis of a Sensor Failure Detection Network," Chou, et al., Nuclear Technology, vol. 101, Jan. 1993, pp. 101-109.
"Validation of Smart Sensor Technologies for Instrument Calibration Reduction in Nuclear Power Plants," Hashemain, et al., NUREG/CR-5903, Jan. 1993, pp. i-ix and 1-154.
"Intelligent Interfaces to Expert Systems Illustrated by a Programmable Signal Validation System," Frogner, Expert Systems Application for the Electric Power Industry, vol. 1, 1991, pp. 243-256.
"Validation of Critical Signals for the Safety Parameter Display System," NP-5066M, Research Project 2292-1, Final Report, Apr. 1987.
"Fault-Tolerant Plant Operations Systems I: A Tutorial on Concepts," Dove (NASA), pp. 370-374, Jun. 9-13, 1985.
"Fault-Tolerant Plant Operations Systems II: Reports on Experience in Implementation," Blancaflor, et al., pp. 375-379, Jun. 9-13, 1985.
"Microcomputer-Based Fault Detection Using Redundant Sensors," Polenta, et al., IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 24, No. 5, Sep. Oct. 1988, pp. 905-912.
"Construction and Evaluation of Fault Detection Network for Signal Validation,"Ning et al., IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 943-947.
"Early Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Finnish Nuclear Power Plants," Eklund, et al., Progress Nuclear Energy, 1988, vol. 21, pp. 479-487.
"Fault Detection Method Using Power Supply Spectrum Analysis," Electronics Letters 27th Sep. 1990, vol. 26, No. 28.
"Process Hypercube Comparison for Signal Validation," Holbert, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 38, No. 2, Apr. 1991, pp. 803-811.
"Algorithm-Based Fault Detection for Signal Processing Applications," Reddy, et al., IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. 39, No. 10, Oct, 1990, pp. 1304-1308.
"Signal Validation Techniques and Power Plant Applications," Divakaruni, et al., Progress in Nuclear Energy, vol. 22, pp. 181-213, 1988.
"Power Signal Validation for Taiwan Research Reactor," Lee, et al., Nuclear Technology, vol. 84, Jan. 1989, pp. 7-13.
"Instrument Fault Detection in a Pressurized Water Reactor Pressurizer," Clark, et al., Nuclear Technology, vol. 56, Jan. 1982, pp. 23-32.
"An Integrated Signal Validation System for Nuclear Power Plants," Holbert, et al., Nuclear Technology, vol. 92, Dec. 1990, pp. 411-427.
"Sensor Fault Monitoring and Process Diagnostics," Upadhyaya, et al., Tennessee Industries Week, vol. 1, Aug. 16-18, 1989.
"Reactor Coolant Pump Surveillance Using Sequential Probability Ratio Tests," K.C. Gross, K.E. Humenik and L. Braun, Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc. (60), Nov. 1989.
"Sequential Probability Ratio Tests for Reactor Signal Validation and Sensor Surveillance Applications," K.E. Humenik and K.C. Gross, Nucl. Sci. and Eng. (105), pp. 383-390, Aug. 1990.
"Reactor Coolant Pump Monitoring and Diagnostic System," R.M. Singer, K.C. Gross, K.E. Humenik and M. Walsh, Proc. 2nd. Intnl. Machinery Monitoring and Diagnostic Conf., Los Angeles, Calif., Oct. 1990.
"Fourier Series Approximation to Randomize Data Used by Sequential Probability Ratio Tests," K.E. Humenik and K.C. Gross, Intnl. Topical Mtg. on Advances in Math, Computations, and Reactor

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Expert system for testing industrial processes and determining s does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Expert system for testing industrial processes and determining s, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Expert system for testing industrial processes and determining s will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-1468330

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.