Estimating the accuracy of molecular property models and...

Data processing: measuring – calibrating – or testing – Measurement system in a specific environment – Chemical analysis

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C435S040500

Reexamination Certificate

active

11172216

ABSTRACT:
Embodiments of the invention provide methods for evaluating the accuracy of a molecular model properties model (or predictions generated using a molecular properties model). The accuracy of a molecular properties model may be evaluated using three general approaches, (i) by using the same data set to both train the model and to estimate the accuracy of the model, (ii) by using distinct data sets to train and subsequently test a model, and (iii) by using multiple models (or sets of predictions).

REFERENCES:
patent: 5446681 (1995-08-01), Gethner et al.
patent: 6081766 (2000-06-01), Chapman et al.
patent: 2002/0123848 (2002-09-01), Schneiderman et al.
patent: 2005/0278124 (2005-12-01), Duffy et al.
patent: WO-03040994 (2003-05-01), None
patent: WO-03040994 (2003-05-01), None
“International Search Report, PCT/US2005/023434”, 1-15.
Anthony, M., et al., “A Result of Vapnik with Applications”,Department of Statistical and Mathematical Sciences(Nov. 23, 1991), 1-13.
Bartlett, P. L., et al., “Rademacher and Gaussian Complexities: Risk Bounds and Structural Results”,Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3 (2002), 463-482.
Beck, B., et al., “QM/NN QSPR Models with Error Estimation: Vapor Pressure and LogP”,J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 40 (4), American Chemical Society (Jul. 2000), 1046-1051.
Benigni, R., et al., “The Second National Toxicology Program Comparative Exercise on the Prediction of Rodent Carcinogenicity: Definitive Results”,Mutation Research, 566 (1), www.sciencedirect.com (Jan. 2004), 49-63.
Boucheron, S. , et al., “Concentration Inequalities”, 215-247.
Carlsen, L., et al., “Partial order ranking-based QSAR's: Estimation of Solubilities and Octanol-Water Partitioning”,Chemosphere, 43 (2001), 295-302.
Cuissart, B., et al., “The Maximum Common Substructure as a Molecular Depiction in a Supervised Classification Context: Experiments in Quantitative Structure/Biodegradability Relationships”,J.Chem. Inf. Comput. Science, 42 (5), American Chemical Society (2002), 1043-1052.
Farkas, O., et al., “Quantitative Structure—Antioxidant Activity Relationships of Flavonoid Compounds”,Molecules, 9, http://www.mdpi.org(2004), 1079-1088.
Hawkins, D. M., et al., “QSAR with Few Compounds and Many Features”,Journal of Chem. Inf. Comput. Science, 41(3) (2001), 663-670.
Hawkins, D. M., et al., “QSARs for Chemical Mutagens from Structure: Ridge Regression Fitting and Diagnostics”,Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology16 (1-2), www.sciencedirect.com (Mar. 2004), 37-44.
Rosset, S., “Model Selection via the AUC”,Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Machine Learning(2004), 8 pgs.
Shawe-Taylor, J., et al., “Structural Risk Minimization over Data-Dependent Hierarchies” (Feb. 24, 1998), 1-35.
Takaoka, Y., et al., “Development of a Method for Evaluating Drug-Likeness and Ease of Synthesis Using a Data Set in Which Compounds are Assigned Scores Based on Chemists' Intuition”,J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 43, American Chemical Society (2003), pp. 1269-1275.
Taskinen, J., et al., “Prediction of Physicochemical Properties Based on Neural Network Modelling”,Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 55 (9), www.sciencedirect.com (Sep. 12, 2003), 1163-1183.
Vapnik, V., et al., “Measuring the VC-dimension of a Learning Machine”,Neural Computation(1994), 1-22.
Votano, J. R., et al., “Three New Consensus QSAR Models for the Prediciton of Ames Genotoxicity”,Mutagenesis(2004), 1-12.
Wang, Z., et al., “Particle Swarm Optimization and Neural Network Application for QSAR”, 1-8.
Wieschaus, E. E., et al., “A Comparison of Methods for the Reduction of Attributes Before Classification in Data Mining”, (Dec. 2003), 1-16.
“Equbits.”LIMSFinder. <http://www.limsfinder.com/community/blog—detail.phd?id=1553—0—2—0—C75>.
Platt et al. “QSAR in Grossly Underdetermined Systems: Opportunities and Issues.”IBM J. Res.&Dev, May/Jul. 2001 vol. 45(3/4): pp. 533-544.
Ekins et al. “Three- and Four-Dimensional Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship Analyses of Cytochrome P-450 3A4 Inhibitors.”Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. Jul. 1999 vol. 290(1): pp. 429-438.
Von Korff et al. “Validation of Variable Selection Techniques: Applications to QSAR.” Institut für Pharmazie und Lebensmittelchemie. <http://www.pharmazie.uni-wuerzburg.de/AKBaumann/reports/qsar2002—2a3b.pdf>.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Estimating the accuracy of molecular property models and... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Estimating the accuracy of molecular property models and..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Estimating the accuracy of molecular property models and... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3775726

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.