Error recovery in RFID reader systems

Communications: electrical – Condition responsive indicating system – Specific condition

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C340S572100, C340S010100, C340S010300

Reexamination Certificate

active

11388235

ABSTRACT:
RFID systems, devices, software and methods are adapted for receiving from an RFID tag at least waves that communicate at least a first version of its code. An output tag code is output that is the same as the first version, if a fidelity criterion is met regarding the first version. If not met, the output tag code is instead a final version that is reconstructed from the first version, and also from any additionally optionally subsequently received versions. In some embodiments, an error recovery block includes a subcomponent fidelity criterion checking block that can determine whether the fidelity criterion is met, and a code reconstruction block that can derive the final version.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4691202 (1987-09-01), Denne et al.
patent: 4783783 (1988-11-01), Nagai et al.
patent: 4935702 (1990-06-01), Mead et al.
patent: 5347280 (1994-09-01), Schuermann
patent: 5537105 (1996-07-01), Marsh et al.
patent: 5742618 (1998-04-01), Lowe
patent: 5805632 (1998-09-01), Leger
patent: 5818348 (1998-10-01), Walczak et al.
patent: 5929779 (1999-07-01), MacLellan et al.
patent: 5933039 (1999-08-01), Hui et al.
patent: 5939945 (1999-08-01), Thewes et al.
patent: 5940006 (1999-08-01), MacLellan et al.
patent: 5952891 (1999-09-01), Boudry
patent: 5952922 (1999-09-01), Shober
patent: 5986570 (1999-11-01), Black et al.
patent: 6130632 (2000-10-01), Opris
patent: 6134182 (2000-10-01), Pilo et al.
patent: 6169485 (2001-01-01), Campana, Jr.
patent: 6208235 (2001-03-01), Trontelj
patent: 6266362 (2001-07-01), Tuttle et al.
patent: 6320788 (2001-11-01), Sansbury et al.
patent: 6353406 (2002-03-01), Lanzl et al.
patent: 6357025 (2002-03-01), Tuttle
patent: 6483427 (2002-11-01), Werb
patent: 6587457 (2003-07-01), Mikkonen
patent: 6691273 (2004-02-01), Wagner et al.
patent: 6801833 (2004-10-01), Pintsov et al.
patent: 6812824 (2004-11-01), Goldinger et al.
patent: 6958678 (2005-10-01), Hohberger et al.
patent: 7103019 (2006-09-01), Moon
patent: 7327218 (2008-02-01), Hohberger et al.
patent: 2001/0010491 (2001-08-01), Marneweck et al.
patent: 2001/0020861 (2001-09-01), Hirose
patent: 2001/0054920 (2001-12-01), Tsujino
patent: 2002/0049910 (2002-04-01), Salomon et al.
patent: 2002/0167405 (2002-11-01), Shanks et al.
patent: 2003/0163287 (2003-08-01), Vock et al.
patent: 2003/0177429 (2003-09-01), Hessel et al.
patent: 2003/0234718 (2003-12-01), Fujisawa et al.
patent: 2004/0090310 (2004-05-01), Hohberger et al.
patent: 2004/0257203 (2004-12-01), Maltsev et al.
patent: 2005/0104790 (2005-05-01), Duron
patent: 2005/0225435 (2005-10-01), Diorio et al.
patent: 2006/0068701 (2006-03-01), Chapman et al.
patent: 2006/0143318 (2006-06-01), Prajapat et al.
patent: 2006/0152364 (2006-07-01), Walton
patent: 2006/0181393 (2006-08-01), Raphaeli
patent: 2006/0261952 (2006-11-01), Kavounas et al.
patent: 0 298 618 (1989-01-01), None
patent: 0 681 192 (1996-07-01), None
patent: 0 696 852 (1997-07-01), None
patent: 0 715 417 (1997-07-01), None
patent: 0 935 211 (1999-08-01), None
patent: 0 939 496 (1999-09-01), None
patent: 11-120305 (1999-04-01), None
patent: WO 01/73854 (2001-10-01), None
Carley, L.R., “Trimming Analog Circuits Using Floating-Gate Analog MOS Memory”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 24, No. 6, Dec. 1989. pp. 1569-1575.
Jonietz, E., “Tracking Privacy”, Technology Review, An MIT Enterprise, Jul. 10, 2004. Three pages.
Low, A. et al., “Basics of Floating-Gate Low-Dropout Voltage Regulators”, IEEE Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Lansing, Michigan, Aug. 8-11, 2000. pp. 1048-1051.
Raszka, J. et al., “Embedded Flash Memory for Security Applications in a 0.13μm CMOS Logic Process”, IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, 2004. Ten pages.
Weis, S.A., et al., “Security and Privacy Aspects of Low-Cost Radio Frequency Identification Systems”, Laboratory for Computer Sciences, Auto-ID Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2003. pp. 1-12.
Yoshida, J., “RFID ‘kill’ feature aims to sooth privacy fears”, CommsDesign, http://www.commsdesign.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=16500813, Apr. 28, 2003. Four pages.
EPCGLOBAL, Inc. “Specification for RFID Air Interface-EPC Radio-Frequency Identity Protocols Class-1 Generation-2 UHF RFID Protocol for Communications at 860 MHz-960 MHz, Version 1.1.0.” (a.k.a. “The Gen 2 Spec”.) EPCglobal Inc., Dec. 17, 2005. <http://www.epcglobalinc.org>.
EPCGLOBAL Inc. “Specification for RFID Air Interface-EPC Radio-Frequency Identity Protocols Class-1 Generation-2 UHF RFID Protocol for Communications at 860 MHz-960 MHz, Version 1.0.8.” EPCglobal Inc., Dec. 14, 2004. <http://www.epcglobalinc.org>.
Declaration of Stacy L. Jones authenticating attached Website Materials as accessed and posted at http://www.autoid.org/SC31/sc—31—wg4—sg3.htm on Sep. 1, 2006.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Error recovery in RFID reader systems does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Error recovery in RFID reader systems, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Error recovery in RFID reader systems will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3910336

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.