Ergonomic soft-feel mouse

Supports – Armrest or headrest

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C248S118100, C248S118500, C345S163000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06390423

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Computer mouses are well known in the computer accessory industry. Indeed, there have been many different mouse designs disclosed in industry literature and in the marketplace. One goal of the industry has been to make a mouse that is comfortable for the user. Thus, several ergonomic-type mouses have been designed. For example, there have been mouses that are designed in the shape of the user's hand, mouses that are designed to support both the wrist and the palm, and mouses that have foam pads to make them softer. However, there has never been a mouse that uses a gel layer for supporting the user's palm. A gel is visco-elastic solid exhibiting the properties of both a spring and a dampener. It is illustrated mechanically by connecting the symbol for a spring with that of a dashpot.
When utilized as a filler material, the gel provides cushion, comfort, support, and protection (attenuation of shock and vibration) in a manner different than traditional fillers.
Foam, for example, provides support by compression. A cellular material, the foam is mostly air or entrapped generation gas having relatively low density. The common polyurethane, highly resilient foam is an open cell structure. There are any number of rubber, neoprene, butyl, vinyl nitrile and EPDM foams that are closed cell, with blowing gas (typically CO
2
) entrapped and providing additional suspension for the structure. Compressing foam deforms the cell walls and movers (in the case of open cell foam) or compresses (in the case of closed cell foam) entrapped gas.
Fiber fillers provide loft and cushioning by the natural resilience of their fibrous structures and the entrapment of air. The effect is similar to the compression of foam.
Gel is unique. A solid gel cannot be compressed. What provides the feeling of softness is elasticity, i.e., very low modulus. Gel provides support by displacement. Based upon the physical properties of the gel, the initial pressure required to begin displacement can be very low, with a progressive resistance that increases with the application of additional pressure. In that way gel can provide comfort while resisting compression or bottoming in ways that foams cannot.
When you overcome the elasticity of the gel material, you move it. This is an advantage in that as the gel is displaced, the contact area increases, helping to maintain low contact pressure.
Another advantage of gel is that it imitates the feel of natural tissue. The hydraulic softness of the gel emulates contact with something living, making gel feel comfortable and “friendly”. Other advantages are:
Gel provides support by displacement as opposed to compression. Increasing contact area assures comfort as pressure is increased.
The low modulus of gel makes it a superior shock and vibration dampening material.
Polyurethane is highly crosslinked, making polyurethane gel a good progressive cushion, that resists bottoming.
Gel has “tissue like” appeal, making it a preferred feel.
Thus, gel layers make a much softer, more comfortable palm rest than foams or other materials known and used in the prior art.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is a principal objective of the present invention to provide an ergonomic mouse having a gel layer for supporting the user's palm.
It is a further objective of the present invention to provide an ergonomic mouse having a gel layer that has a soft feel that is softer, compressible and has more flex than prior art mouses.
It is a further objective of the present invention to provide an ergonomic mouse having a gel layer that was formed from a liquid gel.
It is a further objective of the present invention to provide an ergonomic mouse having an elastomerse layer that was formed using injection molding.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be further understood upon consideration of the following detailed description of the invention.


REFERENCES:
patent: 3676387 (1972-07-01), Lindlof
patent: 3676388 (1972-07-01), Davie
patent: 4346205 (1982-08-01), Hiles
patent: 4368284 (1983-01-01), Tawada et al.
patent: 4476258 (1984-10-01), Hiles
patent: D287725 (1987-01-01), Yoshihama
patent: 4722946 (1988-02-01), Hostettler
patent: D300324 (1989-03-01), Akagi et al.
patent: 4862165 (1989-08-01), Gart
patent: D303662 (1989-09-01), Hsiao et al.
patent: D310521 (1990-09-01), Leung
patent: 4963858 (1990-10-01), Chien
patent: 4973176 (1990-11-01), Dietrich
patent: 4980386 (1990-12-01), Tiao et al.
patent: 5045842 (1991-09-01), Galvin
patent: 5046739 (1991-09-01), Reichow
patent: D326261 (1992-05-01), Ashmun et al.
patent: D328892 (1992-08-01), Miller
patent: D331045 (1992-11-01), Moerke
patent: D331229 (1992-11-01), Pike
patent: 5165630 (1992-11-01), Connor
patent: D331575 (1992-12-01), Pike
patent: 5203845 (1993-04-01), Moore
patent: 5252970 (1993-10-01), Baronowsky
patent: 5280276 (1994-01-01), Kwok
patent: 5287089 (1994-02-01), Parsons
patent: 5298919 (1994-03-01), Chang
patent: 5313229 (1994-05-01), Gilligan et al.
patent: 5336708 (1994-08-01), Chen
patent: 5340067 (1994-08-01), Martin et al.
patent: 5355148 (1994-10-01), Anderson
patent: 5400054 (1995-03-01), Dorst
patent: 5473344 (1995-12-01), Bacon et al.
patent: 5473345 (1995-12-01), Dorst
patent: 5501458 (1996-03-01), Mallory
patent: D370219 (1996-05-01), Blumer et al.
patent: 5530455 (1996-06-01), Gillick et al.
patent: 5563631 (1996-10-01), Masunaga
patent: 5570112 (1996-10-01), Robinson
patent: 5576733 (1996-11-01), Lo
patent: D376790 (1996-12-01), Goulet et al.
patent: 5581277 (1996-12-01), Tajiri
patent: 5633286 (1997-05-01), Chen
patent: D380210 (1997-06-01), Allana et al.
patent: D381013 (1997-07-01), Allana et al.
patent: 5648798 (1997-07-01), Hamling
patent: 5657051 (1997-08-01), Liao
patent: 5659335 (1997-08-01), Partridge, III
patent: D387749 (1997-12-01), Diaz
patent: 5706031 (1998-01-01), Brendzel et al.
patent: 5712725 (1998-01-01), Faltermeier et al.
patent: 5713544 (1998-02-01), Wolf et al.
patent: 5717610 (1998-02-01), Baba
patent: D392959 (1998-03-01), Edwards
patent: 5731807 (1998-03-01), Feierbach
patent: 5760117 (1998-06-01), Chen
patent: 5771038 (1998-06-01), Wang
patent: 5826841 (1998-10-01), Lavore
patent: 5868365 (1999-02-01), Hesley
patent: 5884879 (1999-03-01), Gruenenfelder
patent: 5894302 (1999-04-01), Scenna et al.
patent: 5949406 (1999-09-01), Kress
patent: 6016138 (2000-01-01), Harskamp et al.
patent: 6039292 (2000-03-01), Danzyger et al.
patent: 6050964 (2000-04-01), Yates
patent: 6195085 (2001-02-01), Becker et al.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Ergonomic soft-feel mouse does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Ergonomic soft-feel mouse, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Ergonomic soft-feel mouse will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2860660

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.