Supports – Easel; book – copy or music score holder – Knockdown or collapsible
Reexamination Certificate
2000-02-15
2002-10-15
Chan, Korie (Department: 3632)
Supports
Easel; book, copy or music score holder
Knockdown or collapsible
C248S920000, C248S923000, C361S689000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06464195
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a mounting for computer screen displays, and particularly for notebook and laptop computers.
Ever since the introduction of the personal computer there has been a recognition that postural and visual strain are caused by extended viewing of the screen display as currently mounted, i.e., a simple hinging of the screen housing to the rear of the computer casing. Various devices in the past have been invented to alleviate these problems when using the full size personal computer. Most of these efforts have comprised a mounting that allows adjusting the tilt position of the monitor to reduce visual and postural strain.
In the notebook or laptop computer, the problem is more severe and has remained unsolved. While some inventors have recognized the need, no practical solution has been developed. The use of a portable shelf or screen tilting levers proposed in early efforts at portability have been found to be impractical. Manufacturers and users have come to accept these postural and visual problems as disadvantages to be tolerated to gain the convenience of compactness and portability of the laptops.
As an example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,590,607, issued Jan. 7, 1997, for a “Portable Shelf For Notebook Computers” recognizes the difficulties of long term use of a laptop, and provides a portable support shelf to adjust the computer's height. The inventor cites the advantage of using the shelf to raise the keyboard higher than the user's lap, but lower than normal desk top height. An important disadvantage is the lack of portability since it defeats the main advantage of using a notebook or laptop computer. There are two more serious drawbacks, which are important to appreciate, because they bring to light two serious drawbacks of notebook or laptop computer use. The first is that by lowering the keyboard below desk height to better accommodate wrist use, the postural strain on the back, and especially the neck, are actually increased over desk height use. It is a strain to try to view the screen at a low position even at desk top level. The second is that visual details of the display screen are made more difficult to distinguish when the screen is lowered. What would instead be helpful would be to raise the display screen about six inches above desk height and move it closer to the eyes. But if a portable shelf is used, or any means to raise the whole computer much above desk height, it would then make using the hands and wrists almost impossible.
In the context of personal computers and monitors, the art has recognized the advantages of screen position adjustment. A prior patent for “A Compact Electronic Computer”, U.S. Pat. No. 4,852,032, issued Jul. 25, 1989, describes a personal portable computer that includes a display monitor adjustment. The invention is a complete computer, portable and compact for its 1989 time period. One of its claims is a spring means for adjusting its display screen by allowing the bottom of the display screen to tip outward. While this was a helpful visual adjustment, it was limited to this specific action, accomplished by a complex ratchet mechanism. It is a design of an outmoded portable, and does not anticipate today's notebook computer, and its operation has no relationship in design or function to the present invention.
Another prior art innovation, is described in a patent for “An Adjustable Display Panel For Portable Computer”, U.S. Pat. No. 4,832,419, issued May 23, 1989. While this device relates to the personal portable computer of 1989 and does not anticipate the compact flat notebook or laptop computer, it does recognize the need for display screen adjustment. By a short set of flat levers linked by hinges and curved guide tracks, the display screen is allowed to raise in height and tilt in a fixed arc. Additional screen tilt is accomplished by a saddle that the whole computer frame rests on. It provides additional adjustment by moving in an arc on its yoke and base.
Manipulating this terminal package could provide convenience for earlier portable computers of this portable sewing machine shape, but has no way of benefitting the present day compact and light weight notebook and laptop computers built to travel in a brief case. In fact, the simple adjustment stands for today's personal computer monitors have made this invention outmoded even for largely personal computers. It is designed for the three component system of the monitor, keyboard panel, and terminal; it cannot accommodate either personal computers or notebook types; it uses a series of flat brackets with hinges in between; it pivots on a spring mechanism; the display panel is raised following the arc of a curved track and locks in place by compression in the end of the tracks; it cannot be used with notebook computers.
Another recognition of the advantage of screen adjustment is found in a patent for a “Portable Computer Provided With A Tilting Screen Articulated Thereon By Tilting Linkage With A Bent Shape”, U.S. Pat. No. 5,107,402, issued Apr. 21, 1992. This patent relates to a design of an entire computer that is vertical in structure with a separate keyboard, like the personal computers used in households today. Like the previously discussed patent, it does not provide a mechanical operation that could be useful to today's compact notebook. The working attachment to the screen section is a cranked bent lever. The screen moves from one open face vertical position to roughly the same plane, able to tilt slightly. The display screen when closing moves to its vertical resting position, is folded back against the vertical terminal, and the keyboard is then clipped onto the screen and the terminal making a total vertical package, similar in shape and size to a small traveling utility bag.
FIG. 7 of the '402 patent shows an alternate articulation device which incorporates a connecting bar to eliminate twist or torque in the display section's operation. In addition, the bent crank like brackets, of this prior art alternate, are controlled by a long coiled spring that exerts frictional pressure on the connecting rod by applying pressure against phalanges on a mechanism that encompasses the connecting rod. These phalanges, held against rings, maintain a selected position by friction applied by the spring and its mechanism that encircles the connecting rod or axle.
While prior art in the form of a shelf design attempts to address ergonomic problems of the notebook or laptop computer, it offers more strain than benefit. Besides being a cumbersome piece of additional equipment, it mistakenly sacrifices the needs of the back, the neck, and the eyes to protect the wrist.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,255,214 discloses a screen display support for a portable computer comprised of two arms hinged to the case and pivoted to the screen display so as to allow the screen to be swung towards the front of the case and angularly adjusted. While this allows some improvement in that the screen can be tilted up from viewing or swung towards the user, some bending over would still be necessary as the screen is not able to be moved up appreciably in relation to the viewer's eyes in the various adjusted positions.
Other prior art does not present display screen adjustment mechanisms suitable to the notebook or laptop computers in use today. Those inventions that are available are designs for a specific computer type that bears no resemblance to what is used today. While most include attempts at screen adjustment, none have come into common use. They are intended for computer configurations no longer popular. Their mechanics offer no practical means of adjusting today's portable designs. Their mechanics are bulky and complex and do not solve the postural and visual problems of the notebook or laptop computer.
The object of the present invention is to provide a practical ergonomic mounting for a computer display screen which allows the screen itself to be properly positioned with respect to the user to minimize eye strain and pos
Benefiel John R.
Chan Korie
LandOfFree
Ergonomic mounting for computer screen displays does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Ergonomic mounting for computer screen displays, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Ergonomic mounting for computer screen displays will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2976401