Wells – Valves – closures or changeable restrictors – Longitudinally movable operator
Reexamination Certificate
2001-12-05
2003-11-11
Neuder, William (Department: 3672)
Wells
Valves, closures or changeable restrictors
Longitudinally movable operator
Reexamination Certificate
active
06644408
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The field of this invention related to equalizing valves mounted in ninety degree rotatable closure members, known as flappers, and more particularly to biasing systems to keep such equalizing valves in a closed position.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Typically, a well completion includes a sub-surface safety valve. This valve is actuated from the surface using a hydraulic control system with control lines running from the surface to the valve location. These valves feature a closure member which is rotatable through an arc of ninety degrees. The control system pressure is used to move a hollow tube, known as a flow tube, downwardly, usually against a return spring. The downward movement of the flow tube rotates the flapper downwardly and out of the way to allow flow from the producing formation to reach the surface through the flow tube. Removal of pressure from the control system allowed the return spring to bias the flow tube upward, whereupon another spring on the flapper urged it to the closed position, blocking the opening in the flow tube.
With the flapper in the closed position, formation pressure builds up on the closed flapper. In this intended mode of operation, the flapper holds back the flow from the formation in order to allow for safe well operation. The problem that arises occurs when the well needs to be placed in service at a later time. The flapper must then be opened. However, at this time there may be substantial differential pressure acting on substantially the entire cross-sectional area of the flapper. Aggravating this differential pressure problem would be a situation in the well bore above the closed flapper where thousands of feet of the tubing was gas filled or filled with a light density fluid. The presence of gas or light weight fluids above the flapper had, in the past, required that such fluids be replaced with heavier fluid to eliminate or reduce differential pressure across the flapper prior to actuation of the flow tube. The fluid replacement procedure was costly as well as time consuming and better methods were developed to expedite the re-opening of the flapper under conditions of high differential pressure.
The equalizing valve in the flapper design was developed to addressed this issue. This prior art design is illustrated in
FIG. 1. A
flapper
10
is shown in perspective with a vertical segment
12
machined out adjacent an edge
14
. Undercuts
16
and
18
straddle the vertical segment
12
to allow for placement of a leaf spring
20
therein. Leaf spring
20
straddles bore
22
in which is disposed a plunger
24
. Plunger
24
has a taper
26
which is biased against a mating edge or surface in bore
22
. The plunger
24
is situated so that a flow tube(not shown), when urged downwardly by a control system will first contact plunger
24
and move it against the bias of leaf spring
20
. Thus, before the flapper
10
begins to move, the taper
26
has come off of its mating edge or surface in the bore
22
to equalize pressure on the flapper
10
. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the view in
FIG. 1
illustrates the down hole side of the flapper and that the flow tube is positioned on the opposite side of the flapper from which location it can make initial contact with the extending plunger
24
.
There was a weakness in the design described above which, in some cases, resulted in leakage past taper
26
and its mating surface in bore
22
. The reason this happened is directly related to the amount of the flapper
10
that had to be machined away to form the removed vertical segment
12
and its adjacent undercuts
16
and
18
. The removal of so much metal to accommodate the leaf spring
20
weakened the flapper
10
sufficiently to allow distortion of bore
22
with resulting leakage past taper
26
.
Accordingly, the objective of the present invention is to improve the design of the prior art
FIG. 1
so as to eliminate the leakage problem under conditions of high differential pressure across the flapper
10
. This and other advantages will become apparent to those skilled in the art from a review of the preferred embodiment, described below.
Relevant to the present invention are U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,079,947; 5,884,705; 5,503,229; and 5,752,569.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An equalizer valve for a flapper in a subsurface safety valve is described. A tapered plunger is biased by compact spring disposed in the plunger bore. The spring is supported by a retaining ring which may be a C-shaped ring extending into a peripheral groove around the plunger bore.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3078923 (1963-02-01), Tausch
patent: 4415036 (1983-11-01), Carmody et al.
patent: 4475599 (1984-10-01), Akkerman
patent: 4478286 (1984-10-01), Finberg
patent: 6079497 (2000-06-01), Johnston et al.
patent: 6087036 (2000-07-01), Rouillard et al.
patent: 6254532 (2001-07-01), Paolitto et al.
patent: 6296061 (2001-10-01), Leismer
patent: 2343208 (2000-05-01), None
patent: 2345076 (2000-06-01), None
patent: WO 98/557732 (1998-12-01), None
Baker Hughes Incorporated
Neuder William
Rosenblatt Steve
LandOfFree
Equalizing flapper for down hole safety valves does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Equalizing flapper for down hole safety valves, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Equalizing flapper for down hole safety valves will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3158302