Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology – Measuring or testing process involving enzymes or... – Involving uric acid
Patent
1999-08-12
2000-04-18
Leary, Louise N.
Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology
Measuring or testing process involving enzymes or...
Involving uric acid
435 11, 435 14, 435 17, 435 21, 435 25, 435 20, 4352831, 435963, 435973, C12Q 162, C12Q 160, C12Q 154, C12Q 142, C12Q 126
Patent
active
060513896
DESCRIPTION:
BRIEF SUMMARY
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to an enzyme sensor for measuring the concentration or activity of an analyte in a test fluid and to a membrane for an enzyme sensor, which have been improved with respect to initial specific enzymatic activity. The present invention also relates to a method for improving the enzymatic stability (the lifetime) of enzyme sensors in general.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Enzyme sensors are sensors where a chemical species to be measured (an analyte) undergoes an enzyme catalysed reaction in the sensor before detection. The reaction between the analyte and the enzyme (for which the analyte should be a substrate) yields a secondary species which concentration (under ideal conditions) is proportional with or identical to the concentration of the analyte. The concentration of the secondary species is then detected by a transducer, e.g., by means of an electrode.
The enzyme of an enzyme sensor is typically included in a membrane suited for contacting the test fluid. The enzyme may be included as part of a membrane of a sensor or may be located behind such a membrane. Another alternative is to incorporate the enzyme into the sensor proper, e.g. as part of a carbon paste layer of an electrode. Hence, the analyte is contacted with the enzyme after diffusion into the outer part of the sensor (e.g. the membrane or the carbon paste layer), the enzyme/analyte reaction takes place, and the secondary species then diffuses to the detector part of the sensor, e.g. an electrode.
In a traditional enzyme sensor comprising a membrane, the membrane must, on the one hand, have a suitable porosity so that the analyte diffuses from the test fluid to the enzyme in a controlled manner, and, on the other hand, be impermeable or substantially impermeable to the enzyme in question in order to avoid leaching of the enzyme into the test fluid.
One way to overcome this problem is to immobilize the enzyme in question to a macromolecule so that the physical size and the general low solubility of the enzyme/macromolecule prohibit leaching through the porous membrane. A possible alternative, which may be more suited for in-situ polymerized membranes, could be to entrap the enzyme in polymers.
An interesting example of an analyte which is present in, e.g., body fluids is lactate. Lactate sensors wherein lactate oxidase is immobilized to bovine serum albumin are known (Hu et al., 1993, Analytica Chimica Acta, 281, pp 503-511; Tsuchida et al., 1985, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 27, pp 837-841; Pfeiffer et al., 1992, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 7, pp 661-671; Baker et al., 1995, Anal. Chem., 67, pp 1536-1540; and Liu et al., 1995, Electrochemica Acta, 40, pp 1845-1849). The reported lifetime of lactate sensors is typically around 14 days (see for example Winckers et al., 1996, Clinical Chemistry, 42, No. S6, p S278, poster No. 761).
Typically, when an enzyme, e.g. lactate oxidase, is immobilized, the initial specific enzymatic activity of the immobilized enzyme is reduced compared to a corresponding amount of non-immobilized enzyme. This may be due to the fact that the enzyme, or at least a part (a domain) thereof, does not retain its active conformation during or after the immobilization reaction, or that the immobilization reaction involves functional groups of the enzyme which are situated in or very close to the active site of the enzyme. Thus, a considerable amount of enzyme may be inactivated in the immobilization reaction. The presence of large amounts of inactivated, partially inactivated or denatured enzyme in a sensor is highly undesirable as this may lead to longer response times.
It has been reported that immobilization of trypsin to a solid phase material in the presence of a competitive inhibitor results in almost full retention of the initial specific enzymatic activity (Kuga et al., 1976, Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyushu Univ. Ser. C, 10, pp 77-90; CA: 85:42969h). It has also been described to use a polymeric competitive inhibitor when immobilizing trypsin to water-insoluble carrier
REFERENCES:
patent: 5531878 (1996-07-01), Vadgama et al.
patent: 5567290 (1996-10-01), Vadgama et al.
International Search Report dated Mar. 5, 1998 corresponding to PCT/EP97/06103.
Kuga et al., 1976, Mem. Fac, Sci. Kyushu Univer. Ser. C. 10, pp. 77-90; CA: 85:42969h.
Brown, et al., 1981, Makromol. Chem., 182, pp. 1605-1616.
Hu et al., 1993, Analytica Chimica Acta, 281, pp. 503-511.
Tsuchida et al., 1985, Cotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 27, pp. 837-841.
Pfeiffer et al., 1992, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 7, pp. 661-671.
Baker et al., 1995, Analytical Chemistry, vol. 67, No. 9, May 1, 1995, pp. 1536-1540.
Liu et al., 1995, Electrochemica Acta, vol. 40, No. 12, pp. 1845-1849.
Winckers et al., 1996, Clinical Chemistry, vol. 42, No. S6, poster No. 761.
Simonian, et al., 1997, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 363-371.
Demura et al., 1989, Biosensors, vol. 4, pp. 361-372.
Johnson, 1979, Immobilized enzymes, preparaing and engineering, Noyes Data Corp., pp. 160-161.
Ahl Thomas
Byrnard Allan Milton
Leary Louise N.
Lenna Leo G.
Radiometer Medical A/S
Stiefel Maurice B.
LandOfFree
Enzyme sensor does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Enzyme sensor, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Enzyme sensor will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2335348