Engine delay compensation

Data processing: vehicles – navigation – and relative location – Vehicle control – guidance – operation – or indication – With indicator or control of power plant

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C700S072000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06564141

ABSTRACT:

TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates to controlling internal combustion engines with inherent transport delay.
BACKGROUND ART
Internal combustion engines may have many parameters which must or may be controlled, including spark timing, fuel delivery, air intake, exhaust removal, emissions control, engine speed and torque, accessory control, and the like. Typically, the rotating mass of an engine has substantial inertia which inhibits immediate attempts to change engine parameters. This inertia is represented by integration when modeling the engine parameters.
The control problem is complicated by the presence of delay between when an engine parameter changes and when the corresponding change in a controlling signal occurs. Such delay may be caused by the response time of a sensor detecting the engine parameter, by computational time required to calculate the control signal, and by the response time of an actuator designed to affect the engine parameter. For example, the delay between when a control signal reaches a fuel injector and when the commanded amount of fuel enters the combustion chamber may be a significant factor in the fuel delivery controller design. Even if sensor, computational and actuator delays can be effectively eliminated, the engine itself may introduce delays. For example, piston engines produce discontinuous combustion at discrete points, limiting to specific ranges within each ignition cycle when control events may occur. Regardless of the cause, transport delays may result in over control and instability.
Another factor complicating the problem of engine control is the presence of disturbances in the engine. Disturbances may be any unwanted factor that influences the engine operation. Disturbances may be random, such as electrical noise picked up by sensors used to monitor engine parameters. Disturbances may also be dependent on engine operation, such as frictional losses or vibrations.
A typical model for a control system replaces the one or more engine parameters to be controlled with a linear model having an output for each controlled parameter and a corresponding input providing control signals. A controller, placed before the engine model in the control feed-forward path, provides the control signals. The input to the controller is one or more error signals found as the difference between desired levels for the controlled engine parameters and the actual engine parameter outputs fed back to the controller input. Disturbances are often modeled as an additive signal source in the feed-forward path after the controller.
One well known technique for delay compensation is to place a Smith compensator in an inner negative feedback loop around the controller. The Smith compensator feeds back a simulated engine parameter output to cancel the true engine parameter output and then adds a simulated engine parameter output without the transport delay. If the simulated engine parameter model and the delay value match the actual engine, the Smith compensator will precisely cancel the effects of the delay. However, for a controlled engine parameter subject to inertia, inaccuracies in the simulated engine model may result in saturation errors and the inability to achieve the desired engine parameter values.
Other techniques, such as the closed loop observer in a state-space controller topology, have also been proposed. However, these techniques tend to be complex and are sensitive to the closed loop observer gains.
What is needed is to control an engine with transport delay in a manner that compensates for delay without a substantial increase in complexity, without the need to accurately model engine parameters, and without the possibility of error saturation.
DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION
The present invention provides for control of an engine with inertial integration and delay through the use of a negative feedback compensator around the controller having a finite impulse response.
A system is provided for controlling an engine with transport delay measured as a delay period. The engine has a control input and a controlled output. A control having an error input drives the control input. A delay compensator generates a compensation signal based only on the sum of the controller output over the delay period. The error input is generated as the difference between a desired input and the sum of the controlled output and the compensation signal.
In an embodiment of the present invention, the delay period is approximated by mT, where T is the compensator sampling period. The controller output at the n
th
sampling period is found by summing the m previous controller outputs weighted by a constant K. The constant K may be based on the engine torque gain, the sampling period T, and the engine inertia.
A method is also provided for controlling an engine with transport delay. A control signal is generated for the control input. The control signal is determined so as to control the engine as if the engine was without the delay. A compensation signal is generated as the sum of the control signal only over the delay period. The control signal is based on an error signal generated as the difference between a desired input and the sum of the controlled output and the compensating signal.
An internal combustion engine with transport delay measured as a delay period is also provided. The engine has a plurality of controlled parameters. For at least one controlled parameter having a control input and a controlled output, the engine includes a feed-forward control path driving the control input with a control signal. The feed-forward control path is designed to provide closed-loop control of the controlled parameter without the presence of transport delay. A compensator generates a compensation signal based on the sum of the control signal only over the delay period. The compensation signal provides an input to the feed-forward control path.
The above objects and other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention are readily apparent from the following detailed description of the best mode for carrying out the invention when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.


REFERENCES:
patent: 4862851 (1989-09-01), Washino et al.
patent: 5335643 (1994-08-01), Abate et al.
patent: 60-125741 (1985-07-01), None

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Engine delay compensation does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Engine delay compensation, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Engine delay compensation will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3059973

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.