Heating systems – Steam
Patent
1981-09-02
1984-06-26
Goldstein, Herbert
Heating systems
Steam
73200, F24D 100
Patent
active
044561733
DESCRIPTION:
BRIEF SUMMARY
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a system for detecting vapor phase loss, in a bi-phase fluid circuit, such as in a steam circuit.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention was developed in view of a vexing energy loss problem in steam systems, but is not limited to that environment.
In conventional systems, as steam transfers its heat energy to a load it condenses. A steam trap discharges this condensate, while retaining the steam within the system. However, as the steam trap wears out, it increasingly loses steam and wastes energy.
Three known methods have commonly been used in an attempt to determine the steam loss of a steam trap.
1. Visual requires the discharge of the trap to the atmosphere for observation. However, atmospheric discharge is not always possible, due to the way that the trap has been installed into a condensate return system.
Moreover, with several different types of steam traps on the market, visual observation requires considerable training and skill. While it may be possible to detect a gross trap failure, estimating the magnitude of any steam losses cannot be done accurately as the following table illustrates
______________________________________ Trap at 150 psig
At Atmospheric
Discharge Changes to
Discharges Pressure Mass Flow
Volume Flow
______________________________________
1. 82 #/hr. Cond.
68.6 #/hr. Cond.
1.15 cu. ft./hr. Cond.
0 #/hr. Steam
13.4 #/hr. Steam
360 cu. ft./hr. Steam
2. 50 #/hr. Cond.
41.6 #/hr. Cond.
.695 cu. ft./hr. Cond.
5 #/hr. Steam
13.4 #/hr. Steam
360 cu. ft./hr. Steam
______________________________________
In the table above, Trap 1, has no steam loss, but actually discharges a considerable amount of steam at atmospheric pressure due to flashing of the condensate as the pressure is reduced. As the human eye actually sees a volume flow, in the above example a large cloud of steam and a few drops of water would be seen.
On the other hand, Trap 2, which is defective and has a steam loss, discharges the same volume of steam as Trap 1 but a somewhat smaller volume of condensate. However, the human eye would be very hard pressed to determine which of these two traps actually had a steam loss.
2. In some areas it has been common practice to test traps by reading upstream and downstream trap temperatures with a pyrometer. If the temperature difference is very high, the trap has been considered satisfactory, while if the temperature difference is very low, the trap has been considered defective.
This tends to be a very dubious method as the outlet temperature follows the saturation temperature/pressure relation for steam. A trap with a high rate of steam loss, discharging to a much lower pressure, will display a very high temperature difference. On the other hand, a good trap, discharging through a very low pressure difference, will display very low temperature difference. In actual field service with a condensate return system, the trap outlet pressure is seldom, if ever, known. Accordingly, such temperature difference readings can be highly misleading as to the condition of the trap.
3. A highly trained person using a stethoscope or an ultrasonic device can inspect a trap for steam loss. However, considerable skill and training is required to understand the normal mode of operation of all the various available traps and to be able to distinguish abnormal operation. Sound devices generally can only be used to make a good/bad judgment of trap operation, and cannot accurately quantify the magnitude of a steam loss.
Accordingly, such known prior methods have not been entirely satisfactory.
Accordingly, the objects of this invention include provision of:
An energy loss detecting apparatus which is free of the foregoing limitations of the above-discussed known prior methods.
A system, as aforesaid, which, for measuring a steam loss in a steam trap, remains at supply steam pressure and avoids pressure drops as may cause flashing of condensate to steam, and which is capable of high
REFERENCES:
patent: 3048035 (1962-08-01), Richards et al.
patent: 3926368 (1975-12-01), Geen
patent: 4178801 (1979-12-01), Cassell
patent: 4249697 (1981-02-01), Savage, Jr.
Driscoll Mark D.
Keech David A.
Kirchner Robert T.
Miner David W.
Sorenson John E.
Armstrong International Inc.
Goldstein Herbert
LandOfFree
Energy loss detection system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Energy loss detection system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Energy loss detection system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2228699