Synthetic resins or natural rubbers -- part of the class 520 ser – Synthetic resins – Cellular products or processes of preparing a cellular...
Reexamination Certificate
2000-03-28
2001-09-18
Seidleck, James J. (Department: 1711)
Synthetic resins or natural rubbers -- part of the class 520 ser
Synthetic resins
Cellular products or processes of preparing a cellular...
C208S044000, C208S039000, C423S447400
Reexamination Certificate
active
06291537
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to pitches, particularly mesophase pitches.
Although carbon-carbon composites now find a variety of applications, ranging, for example, from prosthetic implants to components for braking systems and heat exchangers, the major impetus for their further development continues to come from space and defense needs, where the high costs and lengthy processing times of conventional fabrication methods can be justified by unique capabilities of thermal and mechanical performance in the final composite product.
Two types of carbon-carbon composites are widely used: 3D composites that are essentially carbon bodies with some carbon fiber reinforcement effective in all directions, and 2D composites that are usually comprised of one or more parallel plies of fabric woven from carbon fiber. The 3D composites usually take the form of compact bodies that can be used to make nose cones or rocket nozzles for space vehicles. The 2D composites usually take the form of thin- walled tubes, plates, or other shell-like shapes that are particularly useful for structures where lightness, stiffness, and strength are primary considerations.
Three general methods are used in the current art of fabricating carbon-carbon composites. The carbon matrix may be deposited within a carbon fiber preform by: (1) chemical vapor infiltration (CVI) from hydrocarbon gases, such as methane or natural gas; (2) liquid impregnation with thermosetting resins that harden before carbonization reactions begin; or (3) impregnation with liquid pitches including synthetic pitches, as well as those derived from petroleum or coal tar. Repetitive cycles of impregnation and carbonization are usually required to attain useful density levels. In fabrication practice, the method of impregnation may be varied from cycle to cycle.
As presently practiced, all processes are slow and expensive, and fail to realize fully the strength of the reinforcing fibers. Thus a situation has come to exist in which carbon-carbon composites find use in critical applications where no other material could serve, but serious constraints of cost, processing time, and reliability in fabrication limit their development for other applications where such properties as stiffness or refractoriness could provide substantial advantages over other structural materials.
In applying the process of chemical vapor infiltration, it is essential that an appreciable fraction of the reactive gas species diffuse into the full depth of the porous body before carbonization. To maintain such “throwing power,” the process must be restricted to pressure and temperature conditions that make the CVI process inherently slow, expensive, and suitable primarily for thin-walled 2D composites. In practice, “bottleneck” pores limit the attainable density levels, and the formation of external crusts of pyrolytic carbon requires the process to be interrupted for cleaning between cycles. Nevertheless CVI processing is a significant competitor in the prior art of carbon/carbon fabrication and may find an important role in combination with liquid impregnation processes as a final infiltration step to control the degree of fiber-matrix bonding.
Thermosetting resins have been well-exploited for carbon-carbon fabrication because an extensive technology base (in fiber-reinforced plastics) exists for these matrices that can be fixed in place prior to carbonization. However, this thermosetting characteristic also leads to the formation of glassy carbons that are inherently brittle, low in density, and difficult to graphitize. The commonly used impregnants are phenolic resins that carbonize with only modest yield; although higher-yield resins are being explored, they tend to be costly and lack a technology base. The linear shrinkage in carbonization is typically about 20% and can cause severe fiber damage if benign patterns of shrinkage fracture do not form in the matrix. These difficulties require lengthy steps of curing and carbonization and a number of repetitive cycles to reach density levels of 1.65 g/ml.
Pitch-based processing methods emerged from the technology base established by the manufacture of artificial graphites. These processes seek to realize the advantages of high carbon yield and excellent graphitizability that are characteristic of pitch. Pitches are comprised primarily of polynuclear aromatic molecules. Upon pyrolysis, reactions of aromatic polymerization carry the pitch through a liquid crystalline state, known as the carbonaceous mesophase, in which graphitizability is established by parallel alignment of the large flat aromatic molecules. Graphitizable precursors produce cokes of higher density, and graphitic matrices are less brittle than glassy carbon matrices.
These advantages have led to a substantial carbon-carbon fabrication technology based on pitch impregnants. However, the carbonaceous mesophase is a viscous reactive liquid in the practical ranges of processing variables, and the gaseous reaction products cause bloating effects that can seriously reduce densification efficiency. That mesophase pitches bloat seriously upon carbonization, even under substantial applied pressures, is known from studies of petroleum coking in which foaming has been found to commence when the coke feedstock transforms to bulk mesophase, and the microstructure of the coke has been shown to depend on the amount of deformation by bubble percolation. Experience with pitch-based composite processing shows that it is difficult to achieve composite densities greater than 1.6 g/ml as long as room-pressure carbonization methods are used. Thus, although the mechanisms defeating the attainment of high composite densities are different than in the case of processing with thermosetting resins, the ultimate practical density levels are comparable for the two conventional approaches to room-pressure densification by liquid impregnation.
One prior art solution to the difficulties of densification with pitch impregnants is to use an autoclave to apply high pressure during the pyrolysis process until the matrix hardens to coke. This approach is attractive not only to reduce the volume of bubble porosity within the matrix, but also because high-pressure pyrolysis offers a potential increase in carbon yield. In practice the autoclave systems are run at pressures on the order of 15 kpsi to temperatures of about 600° C. This necessarily involves a substantial capital investment in autoclaves, control equipment, and safety facilities. Furthermore high-pressure processing is limited by practical autoclave sizes.
However, detailed analyses of the efficiency of carbon pickup within 3D preforms for each cycle of impregnation and carbonization reveal that the gains in densification by pressure pyrolysis are less than might have been expected. The difficulty in improving the efficiency appears to lie in the fact that the gases emitted during the final stages of mesophase formation and hardening are principally methane and hydrogen, both of which are non-condensable under the pyrolysis conditions. Although pressure applied during pyrolysis reduces the volume of gas evolved in the critical range of mesophase hardening, the volume is still sufficient to expel appreciable amounts of matrix from the fiber preform, and thus to reduce the cycle efficiency.
In fact some bubble porosity seems to be inevitable in any pitch-based process as long as thermal methods are used to harden the mesophase matrix, because the non-condensable gases are essential products of the polymerization reactions that effect the hardening. In this sense high-pressure pyrolysis is an incomplete and less than satisfactory solution to the problem of attaining efficiency in pitch-based densification.
Mesophase pitch is also widely used in the fabrication of carbon fiber and solid carbon articles. Oxidation stabilization is a key step in the manufacture of carbon fiber spun from mesophase pitch. To maintain the strong preferred orientation established by the extensive flow during spinning, and to pr
Ciminelli David L.
Paul Partha P.
Vasishtha Niraj
Bagwell Melanie D.
Bricker Charles E.
Kundert Thomas L.
Seidleck James J.
The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of
LandOfFree
Encapsulation of oxidants for pitch stabilization does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Encapsulation of oxidants for pitch stabilization, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Encapsulation of oxidants for pitch stabilization will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2484853