Electrophotographic image forming apparatus having a gap...

Electrophotography – Image formation – Photoconductive member

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C399S174000, C399S175000, C399S176000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06516169

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to an electrophotographic image forming apparatus and a process cartridge therefor. In particular, the present invention relates to an electrophotographic image forming apparatus using a proximity charger which charges a photoreceptor while a narrow gap is formed between the photoreceptor and the charger, and a process cartridge therefor.
2. Discussion of the Background
Recently the growth of electrophotographic image forming apparatus using a photoreceptor, such as copiers, printers and facsimiles, is remarkable. In particular, photo-printers capable of recording digital information using light have been drastically improving in recording qualities and reliability. This digital recording technique is applied to copiers as well as photo-printers. The copiers to which the conventional analogue copying technique and this digital technique are applied have various image forming functions. Therefore it is considered that the demand for such copiers increases more and more.
In attempting to reduce the quantity of ozone and NOx generated in an electrophotographic image forming apparatus and the electric power consumption of the image forming apparatus when performing charging, charging methods using a charging roller have been proposed.
For example, Japanese Laid-Open Patent Publication No. (hereinafter referred to as JOP) 4-336556 discloses a contact charging device in which a charging roller charges a photoreceptor while contacting the photoreceptor. In the contact charging device, the surface of the charging roller is made of a dielectric material, and the rotating direction of the charging roller is the same as that of the photoreceptor (i.e., at the contact point between the charger and the photoreceptor, the moving direction of the charger is opposite to that of the photoreceptor).
In this case, even when there is a pinhole on the surface of the photoreceptor, a problem in that a charge is not formed around the pin hole does not occur. This is because the surface of the charging roller is dielectric and therefore the charges of the portion of the charging roller to be contacted with the pinhole of the photoreceptor do not decay when performing charging. In addition, even when the photoreceptor and dielectric charging roller are frictionally charged due to friction between the photoreceptor and the charging roller at the contact point thereof, a surface area of the photoreceptor to be charged can be contacted with a surface area of the charging roller having a relatively low charge potential (i.e., a surface area of the charging roller which is not a surface area having a high potential due to rubbing with the photoreceptor), and thereby the photoreceptor can be charged to a desired potential even at a relatively low applied voltage. Since the charging roller charges the photoreceptor while contacting the photoreceptor, the applied voltage is relatively low compared to non-contact chargers such as scorotrons, and therefore the quantity of the above-mentioned reactive gasses generated, such as ozone and NOx, can be reduced.
However, the contact charging devices have the following drawbacks:
(1) uneven charging (i.e., traces of a charging roller) due to uneven contact of the charging roller with the photoreceptor, etc.;
(2) large charging noise;
(3) charging ability deteriorates when toner particles, etc. present on the surface of the photoreceptor adhere on the surface of the charging roller;
(4) photosensitive properties of the photoreceptor change when one or more constituents of the charging roller adhere (migrate) to the photoreceptor; and
(5) the charging roller deforms when the photoreceptor is stopped for a long period of time, resulting in uneven charging.
The uneven charging mentioned above in item (1) is caused by adhesion of the constituents of the charging roller, which are migrated from the charging roller, on the photoreceptor when the photoreceptor is stopped. The large noise mentioned above in item (2) is caused by vibrational contact of the charging roller with the photoreceptor. The vibration of a charging roller is caused when an AC voltage is applied to the charging roller.
In attempting to solve these problems, proximity charging devices have been proposed. In the proximity charging devices, a photoreceptor is charged by applying a voltage to a charger, which is arranged such that a narrow gap of from 0.005 to 0.3 mm is formed between the charger and the photoreceptor.
The proximity charging devices do not cause the problems mentioned above in items (4) and (5) because the charger does not contact the photoreceptor. In addition, with respect to the problem mentioned above in item (3), the proximity charging devices are superior to the contact charging devices because the quantity of toner particles adhered on the charger is less than in the case of contact charging devices.
Various proximity charging methods have been disclosed in, for example, JOPs 2-148059, 5-127496, 5-273837, 5-307279, 6-308807, 8-202126, 9-171282 and 10-288881.
These publications relate to proximity charging methods and it is described therein that a photoreceptor is experimentally charged with a charger while a gap is formed therebetween to observe whether the photoreceptor is evenly charged. However, there is no description in the publications as to how the charger is set closely to the photoreceptor, namely, only ideas of construction of proximity chargers are described therein. Indeed, it is not easy to form a uniform gap not greater than hundreds of micrometers between a charger and a photoreceptor and stably maintain the gap. Namely, proximity charging methods have a big problem of how to stably maintain a gap not greater than hundreds of micrometers between a charger and a photoreceptor.
To the contrary, specific examples of how to set a charger closely to a photoreceptor are described in JOPs 5-107871, 5-273873, 7-168417 and 11-95523.
JOPs 5-107871 and 5-273873 have proposed a method in which an insulating tape whose ends are fixed by springs and which serves as a gap forming member is set between a charger and a photoreceptor, to form a gap between the charger and the photoreceptor. This method is effective in forming a gap between a photoreceptor and a charger. However, when such a gap forming member is practically set on an image forming apparatus, a tension is applied to the springs in only one direction because the photoreceptor rotates in only one direction. Therefore, the springs are easily fatigued. In addition, when such a member is set in the image forming apparatus, the construction of the resultant image forming apparatus becomes complex although this member has a simple mechanism. Therefore the maintenance of the image forming apparatus cannot be easily performed. For example, the image forming apparatus has a drawback in that when the gap forming member is changed, the photoreceptor has to be also changed.
JOP 7-168417 discloses a method in which a gap is formed between a photoreceptor and a charger by setting spacers on bearings of a charger, wherein the spacers contact the surface of the photoreceptor. In this case, the spacers have to be different from the charging portion of the charger in size and material, resulting in complication of the construction of the charger. In addition, in this case the charging roller is made of an insulating material, and therefore a voltage applying roller is needed, resulting in further complication of the construction of the charger and increase of manufacturing costs of the charger.
JOP 11-95523 discloses a method in which a gap is formed between a charger and a photoreceptor by setting a gap forming member on at least one of the charger and the photoreceptor. This apparatus has a simple consruction, but there is no description about the construction of the gap forming member and how to set the gap forming member. Therefore, it is unknown whether a gap can be stably maintained (i.e., the photoreceptor can be stably charged) for a long period of

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Electrophotographic image forming apparatus having a gap... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Electrophotographic image forming apparatus having a gap..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Electrophotographic image forming apparatus having a gap... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3181112

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.