Dynamic magnetic information storage or retrieval – Automatic control of a recorder mechanism – Controlling the head
Reexamination Certificate
1998-12-09
2002-03-19
Hudspeth, David (Department: 2751)
Dynamic magnetic information storage or retrieval
Automatic control of a recorder mechanism
Controlling the head
Reexamination Certificate
active
06359748
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of Invention
This invention relates to damping systems. The invention also relates to damping systems that measure the velocity of a moving part and determine an amount of damping to be applied to the moving part based on the velocity measured. The invention is more particularly related to a damping system that measures the velocity of a moving part, determines a damping factor based on the velocity, and electronically applies the damping factor to the moving part. The invention is still further related to a damping system for an actuator in a tape drive system that electronically measures actuator velocity, determines an amount of damping based on the velocity measured, and applies the damping electronically to the actuator.
2. Description of Related Art
One of the increasing demands placed on the design and manufacture of media storage devices is the ability to increase data density and thereby increase an amount of data that can be stored on the device. One method to increase data density on a tape is to increase the number of data tracks on the tape. However, increasing the number of tracks on a tape requires an increased tracking bandwidth in order to accurately place and maintain a read/write head at a selected track on the tape.
Conventional disk and tape drive systems utilize moving head systems that place the read/write head at selected tracks for reading and/or recording on a media. One type of moving head system commonly utilized in disk drive systems is a linear bearing system.
FIG. 1
illustrates a conventional linear bearing system that comprises a head
10
and carriage
14
that slides along a linear bearing and rail system
12
in order to position the head
10
over an appropriate portion of a media
18
(tape) for reading and recording of data. An actuator
16
is electronically activated to apply motion required for positioning of the head
10
.
The linear bearing system is an advantageous configuration because the sliding mechanism (linear bearing and rail combination), as a free-floating system, utilizes very little energy for movement and is not particularly susceptible to mechanical resonances. However, linear bearing systems will have difficulties or inaccuracies in tracking if dirt or dust particles become deposited on the rail, and therefore operate best in clean or sealed environments. Therefore, linear bearing systems are not well suited for use in tape drives because the bearing and rails are subject to dirt particle depositions from a number of sources, including particles from various tape cartridges placed in the tape drive, and particles in the air of the environment in which the tape drive is placed because the head and drive mechanisms are in an open system (i.e., not operating in a clean room or sealed in a clean environment).
FIG. 2
illustrates a conventional moving head system (spring mass system)
20
utilized in a tape drive. The moving head
10
is attached to a spring
22
, and an actuator
24
. The actuator
24
is electronically positioned by a voice coil
26
. Thus, the voice coil
26
moves the actuator
24
to position the moving head
10
to a specific track on a tape (media
18
).
The conventional tape drive moving head system is advantageous over linear bearing systems because it is less susceptible to tracking inaccuracies caused by dust particles or other dirt that may interfere with moving parts. However, because the moving head system
20
is not a free-floating system (i.e., a spring is attached to the moving head), the actuator
24
requires power to work against the spring
22
at all times. The spring also causes additional problems by increasing susceptibility of the system to mechanical resonances (the spring will resonate similar to a string of a guitar or tuning fork).
The frequency of mechanical resonances experienced in conventional tape drive moving head systems can be calculated from a number of factors, including mass of moving parts (head
10
, spring
22
, and actuator
24
, for example) and a spring constant (K
s
) of the spring
22
. Generally speaking, conventional tape drive moving head systems are designed to place the mechanical resonance at either (1) a low frequency to keep the resonance in band and then provide other mechanisms to either eliminate or reduce effects of the resonance, or, (2) at a high frequency to push the resonance out of band, in which case no other mechanisms are required.
A method of providing a low resonance system is to utilize a high mass moving head. However, a high mass moving head causes control problems because movement of a high mass moving head is more difficult to control.
A method of providing a high resonance system is to utilize a high spring constant (Ks) for the spring
20
, which increases the resonance frequency. However, a high spring constant is disadvantageous because a stiffer spring requires greater power expenditure in order to place and maintain head position (i.e., placement of the head requires continuous work against the spring).
Compared to a disk drive system (where speed of movement between tracks is critical), tape drive moving head systems do not require extremely fast track to track movements and therefore large acceleration forces are not encountered, thus making it easier to place a tape drive moving head on a selected track. However, a tape drive actuator does need to maintain a steady state in order to keep the head on the selected track.
Therefore, tape drive designers have to determine a proper mix of design elements (mass of moving parts: spring, head and actuator, and the spring constant) to determine a resulting mechanical resonance that can be reduced or eliminated effectively. Basically, the higher the mass, the lower the resonance, but more control difficulties are encountered. The higher the spring constant, the higher the resonance, but higher power is required.
Simply increasing the spring constant (Ks) higher to place the mechanical resonances out of band is not an effective solution because, in addition to higher power consumption, the higher spring constant also reduces a vertical range of motion of the moving head. Conversely, if the spring constant is too low (too loose), then the head will start floating around and control becomes more difficult.
The increasing storage capacities of modern media have added additional problems to tape drive design. These problems basically revolve around higher track densities and higher perturbation from the system because the tape is being run faster. Under normal operation, the tape being written/read moves up and down (perturbation). However, additional tracks and faster tape movement cause the up and down motion of the tape to be higher. In addition, a higher tracking bandwidth is also required because higher tape density (additional tracks, for example) requires more precise placement of the moving head. Each of these factors causes the resonance to become a main factor in the servo load of the tape deck.
An additional factor in tape drive design is damping. Damping is required to keep the spring mass system from continuing to resonate after each inflection (each up or down motion of the head, for example). The spring mass system by itself has very low damping, which causes a small inflection produces a lot of resonance. The resonance of the spring mass system eventually dies down, but normally takes a considerable amount of time. Therefore, modern tape drive designs provide damping systems to limit resonance behavior.
Damping systems typically consist of lossy materials that disrupt resonance behavior. For example, a viscous oil may be used to surround part of the spring and/or actuator to provide damping. However, because these damping systems are mechanical units, they are costly, requiring additional design, space, manufacturing steps, and maintenance.
For example, damping by lossy materials requires design decisions such as where and how to place the lossy material. Maintenance problems include leakage of the lossy material (leakage of viscous
Fliesler Dubb Meyer & Lovejoy LLP
Habermehl James L
Hudspeth David
Seagate Technology Inc.
LandOfFree
Electronically damped flexure based actuator system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Electronically damped flexure based actuator system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Electronically damped flexure based actuator system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2843821