Fluid-pressure and analogous brake systems – Speed-controlled – Having a valve system responsive to a wheel lock signal
Reexamination Certificate
2000-03-31
2002-03-19
Oberleitner, Robert J. (Department: 3613)
Fluid-pressure and analogous brake systems
Speed-controlled
Having a valve system responsive to a wheel lock signal
C303S113400, C303S156000, C303S115200
Reexamination Certificate
active
06357837
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to an electronically controllable brake booster. In particular, the present invention relates to an electronically controllable brake booster with a vacuum chamber and a pressure chamber, which are separated from each other by a movable wall, a control valve arrangement which can be actuated by means of an electromagnetic actuation means, and by means of which a pressure difference between the pressure chamber and the vacuum chamber can be adjusted, with the control valve arrangement, as a function of a current flowing through the electromagnetic actuation means, assuming a holding position in which the current ranges between a higher value and a lower value without the control valve arrangement leaving its holding position, a first pressure changing position in which the current is higher than the higher value, and a second pressure changing position in which the current is lower than the low value.
From DE 195 27 493 A1 an electromagnetic actuation means is known which comprises a solenoid coil which can be subjected to a control current and an armature which is associated with the solenoid coil and which is adapted to perform movements which are a function of a control current flowing through the solenoid coil and a spring arrangement which biases the armature in the opposite direction. Therein, a holding position is defined as a manipulated variable, which the armature assumes at a holding current through the solenoid coil. This holding current flowing through the solenoid coil can be changed to a higher value or to a lower value without the armature leaving the holding position.
In addition, both the higher and the lower current value are dimensioned in such a manner that interfering influences on the magnetic and spring forces actuating the armature do not bring the armature into an actuated position which differs from the holding position.
For this purpose, the higher current value is determined in such a manner that a value which is related to the position of the armature in the holding position is determined; the control current is increased by a predetermined current step in a stepwise manner and output as a manipulated variable to the solenoid coil of the electromagnetic actuation means, until the value which is related to the position of the armature in the holding position changes by a predetermined value towards the second actuated position.
The lower current value is determined in such a manner that a value which is related to the position of the armature in the holding position is determined; the control current is decreased by a predetermined current step in a stepwise manner, and output as a manipulated variable to the solenoid coil of the electromagnetic actuation means, until the value which is related to the position of the armature in the holding position changes by a predetermined value towards the first actuated position.
From this document is it also known that the control valve arrangement can reliably be brought into the holding position if the arithmetic mean value of the currents is selected for the holding current.
However, the “Learning of the working points” covered in DE 195 27 493 A1 is limited in that the decisive currents for the lower limit and the upper limit must be learned and stored at each commencement of a trip upon switching on the ignition or in periodic time intervals during driving.
Upon controlling the control valve arrangement, the currents which have been learned in this manner are used for specifying the first manipulated variable in order to achieve an adequate control behaviour.
In addition, the pressure difference acting upon the movable wall of the brake booster, which can be adjusted to different values depending upon the desired control, is not considered quantitatively. The pressure difference adjusted at the movable wall is also acting immediately upon the valve body, the valve seat, and the valve element, which also leads to a shift of the currents for the lower limit and for the upper limit.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention, the invention deals with the problem which results from the shift of the upper and lower current values that are necessary in order to retain the control valve arrangement in its holding position.
It is the object of the present invention to eliminate this disadvantage so that the control behaviour is further improved.
As a solution, the invention proposes that with the initially mentioned electronically controllable brake booster, upon a changeover of the control valve arrangement from the holding position into the first or the second pressure changing position, or upon a changeover from the first or the second pressure changing position into the holding position, the time required for the changeover is determined, the determined time is compared with a predetermined time interval in order to verify whether the changeover has taken place within said pre-determined time interval, and the higher and/or lower current value I
AUFBAU,NEU,
I
ABBAU,NEU
defining the holding position is modified for future changeovers if the determined time exceeds the predetermined time interval.
Further configuration and variation possibilities are characterised in the dependent claims.
Further properties, advantages, characteristics, and variation possibilities of the invention will be explained by means of the following description of a current preferred embodiment of the invention with reference to the drawings.
REFERENCES:
patent: RE31383 (1983-09-01), Leiber et al.
patent: 5505526 (1996-04-01), Michels
patent: 5538337 (1996-07-01), Harris
patent: 5711204 (1998-01-01), Michels
patent: 5725291 (1998-03-01), Michels
patent: 5816667 (1998-10-01), Jokic
patent: 5836659 (1998-11-01), Feigel et al.
patent: 5855420 (1999-01-01), Lawrence
patent: 5924508 (1999-07-01), Clauss et al.
patent: 5948036 (1999-09-01), Okubo
patent: 5969443 (1999-10-01), Linden et al.
patent: 6033037 (2000-03-01), Eckert
patent: 6033039 (2000-03-01), Dieringer et al.
patent: 6185498 (2001-02-01), Linden et al.
patent: 6186601 (2001-02-01), Linden et al.
patent: 196 12 952 (1996-04-01), None
patent: 195 27 493 (1997-01-01), None
patent: 0 706 924 (1996-04-01), None
patent: 0 800 976 (1997-10-01), None
patent: WO 93/24353 (1993-12-01), None
patent: WO 95/03196 (1995-02-01), None
patent: WO 96/06763 (1996-03-01), None
Godlewsky Gregor
Linden Christoph
Maack Lorenz
Lucas Industries public limited company
MacMillan Sobanski & Todd LLC
Oberleitner Robert J.
Pezzlo Benjamin A.
LandOfFree
Electronically controllable brake booster does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Electronically controllable brake booster, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Electronically controllable brake booster will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2825213