Electronic predication system for assessing a suitability of...

Data processing: artificial intelligence – Neural network – Learning task

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C706S045000, C706S046000, C705S014270

Reexamination Certificate

active

07606778

ABSTRACT:
A system and method for testing and/or evaluating employees or potential employees is disclosed. A computer arranges a plurality of applicants in a stack ranked table. The table may rank or re-rank applicants against each other, from best to worst, after successive screening, selecting, and/or interviewing stages for a particular job. Performance evaluations of hired workers may be fed back to the computer for adjusting the system and method. Competencies shown to be predictive of successful performance of a given type of job are tested for at various stages in an online testing system.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5059127 (1991-10-01), Lewis et al.
patent: 5117353 (1992-05-01), Stipanovich et al.
patent: 5164897 (1992-11-01), Clark et al.
patent: 5170362 (1992-12-01), Greenberg et al.
patent: 5197004 (1993-03-01), Sobotka et al.
patent: 5325862 (1994-07-01), Lewis
patent: 5326270 (1994-07-01), Ostby et al.
patent: 5408588 (1995-04-01), Ulug
patent: 5416694 (1995-05-01), Parrish et al.
patent: 5461699 (1995-10-01), Arbabi
patent: 5467428 (1995-11-01), Ulug
patent: 5490097 (1996-02-01), Swenson
patent: 5551880 (1996-09-01), Bonnstetter et al.
patent: 5565316 (1996-10-01), Kershaw
patent: 5592375 (1997-01-01), Salmon
patent: 5618182 (1997-04-01), Thomas
patent: 5671409 (1997-09-01), Fatseas
patent: 5722418 (1998-03-01), Bro
patent: 5727128 (1998-03-01), Morrison
patent: 5774883 (1998-06-01), Andersen et al.
patent: 5788504 (1998-08-01), Rice et al.
patent: 5799282 (1998-08-01), Rakshit
patent: 5827070 (1998-10-01), Kershaw et al.
patent: 5832497 (1998-11-01), Taylor
patent: 5885087 (1999-03-01), Thomas
patent: 5974392 (1999-10-01), Endo
patent: 5978767 (1999-11-01), Chriest
patent: 5978768 (1999-11-01), McGovern et al.
patent: 5980096 (1999-11-01), Thalhammer-Reyero
patent: 5999909 (1999-12-01), Rakshit
patent: 6035295 (2000-03-01), Klein
patent: 6049776 (2000-04-01), Donnelly
patent: 6056556 (2000-05-01), Braun et al.
patent: 6070143 (2000-05-01), Barney et al.
patent: 6086382 (2000-07-01), Thomas
patent: 6115646 (2000-09-01), Fiszman
patent: 6126448 (2000-10-01), Ho et al.
patent: 6144838 (2000-11-01), Sheehan
patent: 6189029 (2001-02-01), Fuerst
patent: 6213780 (2001-04-01), Ho
patent: 6259890 (2001-07-01), Driscoll
patent: 6266659 (2001-07-01), Nadkarni
patent: 6272467 (2001-08-01), Durand
patent: 6275812 (2001-08-01), Haq
patent: 6289340 (2001-09-01), Puram
patent: 6311164 (2001-10-01), Ogden
patent: 6334133 (2001-12-01), Thompson
patent: 6338628 (2002-01-01), Smith
patent: 6341267 (2002-01-01), Taub
patent: 6370510 (2002-04-01), McGovern
patent: 6385620 (2002-05-01), Kurzius et al.
patent: 6405159 (2002-06-01), Bushey
patent: 6442370 (2002-08-01), Driscoll et al.
patent: 6463430 (2002-10-01), Brady
patent: 6466914 (2002-10-01), Mitsuoka
patent: 6484010 (2002-11-01), Sheehan
patent: 6493723 (2002-12-01), Busche
patent: 6513042 (2003-01-01), Anderson et al.
patent: 6514079 (2003-02-01), McMenimen
patent: 6514084 (2003-02-01), Thomas
patent: 6524109 (2003-02-01), Lacy
patent: 6567784 (2003-05-01), Bukow
patent: 6591246 (2003-07-01), Tuttle
patent: 6611822 (2003-08-01), Beams
patent: 6618734 (2003-09-01), Williams et al.
patent: 6640216 (2003-10-01), Loofbourrow et al.
patent: 6681098 (2004-01-01), Pfenninger
patent: 6691122 (2004-02-01), Witte
patent: 6728695 (2004-04-01), Pathria
patent: 6735570 (2004-05-01), Lacy
patent: 6742002 (2004-05-01), Arrowood
patent: 6769066 (2004-07-01), Botros
patent: 6795799 (2004-09-01), Deb
patent: 6853966 (2005-02-01), Bushey
patent: 6857877 (2005-02-01), Watanabe
patent: 6865581 (2005-03-01), Cloninger
patent: 6865608 (2005-03-01), Hunter
patent: 6873964 (2005-03-01), Williams
patent: 6944596 (2005-09-01), Gray
patent: 7043443 (2006-05-01), Firestone
patent: 7080057 (2006-07-01), Scarborough
patent: 7191138 (2007-03-01), Roy
patent: 7191139 (2007-03-01), Roy
patent: 7200563 (2007-04-01), Hammitt
patent: 7310626 (2007-12-01), Scarborough
patent: 7356484 (2008-04-01), Benjamin
patent: 7505919 (2009-03-01), Richardson
patent: 2001/0011280 (2001-08-01), Gilbert
patent: 2001/0031457 (2001-10-01), Pfenninger
patent: 2001/0042000 (2001-11-01), Defoor, Jr.
patent: 2002/0019940 (2002-02-01), Matteson
patent: 2002/0042786 (2002-04-01), Scarborough et al.
patent: 2002/0046199 (2002-04-01), Scarborough et al.
patent: 2002/0128892 (2002-09-01), Farenden
patent: 2002/0128893 (2002-09-01), Farenden
patent: 2002/0128894 (2002-09-01), Farenden
patent: 2002/0198766 (2002-12-01), Magrino et al.
patent: 2003/0037032 (2003-02-01), Neece et al.
patent: 2003/0101091 (2003-05-01), Levin et al.
patent: 2003/0191680 (2003-10-01), Dewar
patent: 2003/0195786 (2003-10-01), Dewar
patent: 2003/0200136 (2003-10-01), Dewar
patent: 2005/0114279 (2005-05-01), Scarborough
patent: 2005/0246299 (2005-11-01), Scarborough
patent: WO 99/17242 (1999-04-01), None
Chang et al, “The Development of a Computer-Based Decision Support System for Use in Evaluating Candidates for the Position of Programmer-Analyst”, ACM SIGCRR, Apr. 1991.
Lim et al, “A Method for (Recruiting) Methods: Faciliating Human Factors input to System Design”, ACM 1992.
Dianna Franklin, “An Effective Way to Hire Technical Staff”, ACM SIGUCCS, 1986.
Decision Point Data, Inc (“1999 StoreWorks! Conference and Exhibition,” 13 pages, May 1999).
Paul W. Brooks (“Internet Assessment: Opportunities and Challenges” IPMAAC Jun. 4, 2000).
Appendix A, pp. 1-3 http://web.archive.org/web/19981206082136/www.nrf.com/events/.
Ed Rubinstein (“Operators embrace automated systems to hire the best, reduce turnover” 1997.
Schmidt, Exploring the boundary conditions for interview validity: meta-analytic validity findings for a new interview type, Summer 1999, Personnel Psychology, v.52, n.2, pp. 445-464 (20 pages) .
Kaak, The weighted application blank, Apr. 1998, Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, v.39, n.2.
Stokes (editor) Biodata Handbook: theory, research, and use of biographical information in selection and performance prediction, Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc., 1994, p. vii-xix, 626-650 (22 pages).
The Candidate Profile Record, brochure, Richardson, Bellows, Henry & Co., Inc., Copyright 1982, 1983, 1989 (questionnaire).
“A Technology Case Study for Human Resource Executive”, Getting the High-Tech Hiring Edge, www.workindex.com/editorial/staff/sta0301.01.asp.
“Sperion, ExxonMobil expand employee-screening agreement”, Industry News, www.petroretail.net
pn/2001/0201/0201msin.asp.
Robert F. Emrich, “The Many Advantages of Using IPS Diagnostic Software”, Science Curriculum Inc., H.C. Crittenden Middle School, Armonk, New York; www.sci-ips.com/ips/diagnostic—advantages.html.
G. David Garson,Neural Networks An Introductory Guide for Social Scientists, New Technologies for Social Research, SAGE Publications, 1998, pp. 1-194.
“NeuralWorks Professional II/Plus,” http://www.neuralware.com/products—pro2.jsp, Jul. 28, 2001, pp. 1-3.
“Statistica Neural Networks,” http://www.statsoft.com/stat—nn.html, Jul. 28, 2001, pp. 1-11.
David Scarborough and Batrus Hollweg, “Tutorial on the Use of Neural Network Models for Personnel Selection,”Decision Sciences Institute Southwest Region Theory and Applications Proceedings 27th Annual Conference, Mar. 6-9, 1996, pp. 151-153.
David B. Marshall and Diana J. English ,“Neural Network Modeling of Risk Assessment in Child Protective Services,”Psychological Methods, vol. 5, No. 1, 2000, pp. 102-124.
Ajay K. Aggarwal et al., “Selection of Surgical Residents: A Neural Network Approach,”Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal, vol. 31, 2000, pp. 417-430.
Judith M. Collins and Murray R. Clark, “An Application of the Theory of Neural Computation to the Prediction of Workplace Behavior: An Illustration and Assessment of Network Analysis,”Personnel Psychology, vol. 46, 1993, pp. 503-524.
Mitchell, “How to Reduce the High Cost of Turnover,” Lawson Sof

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Electronic predication system for assessing a suitability of... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Electronic predication system for assessing a suitability of..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Electronic predication system for assessing a suitability of... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4079961

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.