Electronic message delivery using an alternate source approach

Details Electronic message delivery using an alternate source approach Electronic message delivery using an alternate source approach

2007-05-15

2007-05-15

Jaroenchonwanit, Bunjob (Department: 2152)

Electrical computers and digital processing systems: multicomput

Computer conferencing

Demand based messaging

C709S202000

Reexamination Certificate

active

10347055

ABSTRACT:
Message delivery approaches in which senders define filters with associated actions for evaluation in relation to specified messages. After creating and storing filters with specified actions, senders dispatch messages to a processing system, which evaluates the filters against the messages. If a match occurs, the processing system performs the specified actions on the messages. The processing system may send the same message multiple times to different receiving systems, and may modify the source IP address and outbound interface of the message for each receiving system. The source IP address or interface may be modified by a filter in response to external events, such as a receiving system blocking another copy of the message. A single message processing system can appear as a large number of virtual message sendingunits.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5319776 (1994-06-01), Hile et al.
patent: 5623600 (1997-04-01), Ji et al.
patent: 5802178 (1998-09-01), Holden et al.
patent: 5805810 (1998-09-01), Maxwell
patent: 5822526 (1998-10-01), Waskiewicz
patent: 5832208 (1998-11-01), Chen et al.
patent: 5889943 (1999-03-01), Ji et al.
patent: 5915087 (1999-06-01), Hammond et al.
patent: 5937162 (1999-08-01), Funk et al.
patent: 5958005 (1999-09-01), Thorne et al.
patent: 5968176 (1999-10-01), Nesset et al.
patent: 5983270 (1999-11-01), Abraham et al.
patent: 5983350 (1999-11-01), Minear et al.
patent: 5999967 (1999-12-01), Sundsted
patent: 6003084 (1999-12-01), Green et al.
patent: 6052709 (2000-04-01), Paul
patent: 6072942 (2000-06-01), Stockwell et al.
patent: 6131110 (2000-10-01), Bates et al.
patent: 6161129 (2000-12-01), Rochkind
patent: 6161130 (2000-12-01), Horvitz et al.
patent: 6192114 (2001-02-01), Council
patent: 6195587 (2001-02-01), Hruska et al.
patent: 6212558 (2001-04-01), Antur et al.
patent: 6226670 (2001-05-01), Ueno et al.
patent: 6233618 (2001-05-01), Shannon
patent: 6266664 (2001-07-01), Russell-Falla et al.
patent: 6266692 (2001-07-01), Greenstein
patent: 6289105 (2001-09-01), Murota
patent: 6330590 (2001-12-01), Cotton
patent: 6341309 (2002-01-01), Vaid et al.
patent: 6377936 (2002-04-01), Henrick et al.
patent: 6393568 (2002-05-01), Ranger et al.
patent: 6408336 (2002-06-01), Schneider et al.
patent: 6421709 (2002-07-01), McCormick et al.
patent: 6434600 (2002-08-01), Waite et al.
patent: 6460050 (2002-10-01), Pace et al.
patent: 6484261 (2002-11-01), Wiegel
patent: 6502131 (2002-12-01), Vaid et al.
patent: 6507866 (2003-01-01), Barchi
patent: 6539430 (2003-03-01), Humes
patent: 6574658 (2003-06-01), Gabber et al.
patent: 6587550 (2003-07-01), Council et al.
patent: 6591291 (2003-07-01), Gabber et al.
patent: 6609196 (2003-08-01), Dickinson, III et al.
patent: 6650890 (2003-11-01), Irlam et al.
patent: 6654787 (2003-11-01), Aronson et al.
patent: 6675162 (2004-01-01), Russell-Falla et al.
patent: 6732157 (2004-05-01), Gordon et al.
patent: 6785732 (2004-08-01), Bates et al.
patent: 6894981 (2005-05-01), Coile et al.
patent: 7047280 (2006-05-01), Hall et al.
patent: 7054906 (2006-05-01), Levosky
patent: 7065555 (2006-06-01), Foulger et al.
patent: 7139825 (2006-11-01), Andaker et al.
patent: 2001/0005885 (2001-06-01), Elgamal et al.
patent: 2002/0016824 (2002-02-01), Leeds
patent: 2002/0087641 (2002-07-01), Levosky
patent: 2002/0133469 (2002-09-01), Patton
patent: 2002/0133625 (2002-09-01), Hall et al.
patent: 2002/0152272 (2002-10-01), Yairi
patent: 2002/0184315 (2002-12-01), Earnest
patent: 2002/0199095 (2002-12-01), Bandini et al.
patent: 2003/0050988 (2003-03-01), Kucherawy
patent: 2003/0079142 (2003-04-01), Margalit et al.
patent: 2003/0093689 (2003-05-01), Elzam et al.
patent: 2003/0097591 (2003-05-01), Pham et al.
patent: 2003/0110224 (2003-06-01), Cazier et al.
patent: 2003/0149726 (2003-08-01), Spear
patent: 2003/0158905 (2003-08-01), Petry et al.
patent: 2003/0167402 (2003-09-01), Stolfo et al.
patent: 2003/0172050 (2003-09-01), Decime et al.
patent: 2003/0172291 (2003-09-01), Judge et al.
patent: 2003/0200334 (2003-10-01), Grynberg
patent: 2003/0229717 (2003-12-01), Teague
patent: 2004/0019648 (2004-01-01), Huynh et al.
patent: 2004/0019651 (2004-01-01), Andakar
patent: 2004/0054742 (2004-03-01), Gruper et al.
patent: 2004/0058673 (2004-03-01), Irlam et al.
patent: 2004/0064371 (2004-04-01), Crapo
patent: 2004/0073617 (2004-04-01), Miliken et al.
patent: 2004/0083230 (2004-04-01), Caughey
patent: 2004/0093384 (2004-05-01), Shipp
patent: 2004/0167968 (2004-08-01), Wilson et al.
patent: 2004/0215977 (2004-10-01), Goodman et al.
patent: 2004/0260922 (2004-12-01), Goodman et al.
patent: 2005/0005107 (2005-01-01), Touboul
patent: 2005/0064850 (2005-03-01), Irlam et al.
patent: 2005/0071485 (2005-03-01), Ramagopal
patent: 2005/0080856 (2005-04-01), Kirsch
patent: 2005/0108518 (2005-05-01), Pandya
patent: 2005/0182959 (2005-08-01), Petry et al.
patent: 2005/0193429 (2005-09-01), Demopoulos et al.
patent: 0899918 (1999-03-01), None
patent: 2000 339236 (2000-08-01), None
patent: WO 01/67330 (2001-09-01), None
patent: WO 02/25464 (2002-03-01), None
patent: WO 02/39356 (2002-05-01), None
patent: WO 02/19069 (2002-07-01), None
Nicholas, “Realtime Blackhole List”, Feb. 2, 2000, http://mail-abuse.org/rbl/spamware.htm.
Sullivan, “Buffalo Spammer' Sentenced to 3-½ to 7 Years” May 27, 2004, http:/
ews.yahoo.com
ews?tmpl=story&u=
m/20040527/us—nm/tech—spam—dc—6.
“Prevention of Forged-Spam email via Sendmail (Relay Disable)” http://docsrv.sco.com/MM—admin/mmadminC.spam—forge.html, Nov. 1999.
Gopal, Ram D.; Walter, Zhiping; and Tripathi, Arvind K., “Admediation: New Horizons in Effective Email Advertising,” Communications of the ACM, ACM Press, Dec. 2001, vol. 44, Issue 12, pp. 91-96.
Mazieres, David; and Kaashoek, M. Frans, “The Design, Implementation and Operation of an Email Pseudonym Server,” Proceedings of the 5thACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS) 1998, ACM Press, Nov. 1998, pp. 27-36.
International Searching Authority, “Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration,” Aug. 13, 2004, 10 pages.
Current Claims in International Application, application No. PCT/US04/00969, 19 pages.
Declan McCullagh, “Spam Blocker charges for e-mail,” Feb. 19, 2003, http:/
ews.com.com/2100-1023-985175.html, printed Feb. 19, 2003, pp. 1-3.
Robert Lemos, “Paying up for a spam seal of approval,” Jun. 24, 2002, http:/
ews.com.com/2100-1001-938976.html, printed Feb. 19, 2003, pp. 1-3.
Cashramspam.com, “CashRamSpam.com,” file://C:\DOCUME˜1\LOCALS˜1\temp\20JL2VHO.htm, printed Feb. 19, 2003, 9 pages.
International Searching Authority, “Notification of transmittal of the international search report and the written opinion of the international searching authority, or the declaration,” international application No. PCT/US2005/005498, dated May 18, 2005, 12 pages.
Current Claims, PCT/US2005/005498, 14 pages.
Avery, Mike, “Networking: Product Reviews: MimeSweeper neatly cleans up e-mail Web Content,” Info World Jun. 23, 1997, reproduced by High Beam Research LLC., 3 pages. (Reference on CD-ROM).
“Check Point Firewalls,” [Online], retrieved from the internet URL: <http://www.trellisnet.com/Security/Checkpoint/firewalls.asp>, Trellis Network Services, Retrieved on May 18, 2004, pp. 1-3. (Reference on CD-ROM).
“Check Point Signs Technology licensing Agreement with RSA Data Security,” Check Point Software Technologies LTD., Sep. 18, 1995, 2 pages. (Reference on CD-ROM).
“Check Point Software technologies to Secure Backweb's Internet Broadcasting Software,” Check Point Software Technologies LTD., reproduction of article from Internet World dated Dec. 11, 1996, 2 pages. (Reference on CD-ROM).
“Control Data Systems Partners With Check Point Software To Resell FireWall-1,” Check Point Software Technologies

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Electronic message delivery using an alternate source approach does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Electronic message delivery using an alternate source approach, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Electronic message delivery using an alternate source approach will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3821347