Electronic ink processing

Details Electronic ink processing Electronic ink processing

2003-08-21

2008-12-23

Coles, Edward L. (Department: 2625)

Facsimile and static presentation processing

Static presentation processing

Data corruption, power interruption, or print prevention

C382S186000, C382S112000, C382S177000, C358S001150, C358S001110

Reexamination Certificate

active

07468801

ABSTRACT:
An application programming interface instantiates an ink analyzer object that receives document data for a document containing electronic ink content from a software application hosting the document and running on a first processing thread. The ink analyzer object then employs the first thread to make a copy of the document data, provides the copy of the document data to an electronic ink analysis process, and returns control of the first processing thread to the analysis process. After the analysis process has analyzed the electronic ink, the ink analyzer object reconciles the results of the analysis process with current document data for the document.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5394484 (1995-02-01), Casey et al.
patent: 5455901 (1995-10-01), Friend et al.
patent: 5546538 (1996-08-01), Cobbley et al.
patent: 5559897 (1996-09-01), Brown et al.
patent: 5587560 (1996-12-01), Crooks et al.
patent: 5588147 (1996-12-01), Neeman et al.
patent: 5600834 (1997-02-01), Howard
patent: 5799315 (1998-08-01), Rainey et al.
patent: 5806074 (1998-09-01), Souder et al.
patent: 5911013 (1999-06-01), Taniishi
patent: 6240414 (2001-05-01), Beizer et al.
patent: 6292857 (2001-09-01), Sidoroff et al.
patent: 6377259 (2002-04-01), Tenev et al.
patent: 6442555 (2002-08-01), Shmueli et al.
patent: 6603881 (2003-08-01), Perrone et al.
patent: 6665425 (2003-12-01), Sampath et al.
patent: 6687876 (2004-02-01), Schilit et al.
patent: 7106905 (2006-09-01), Simske
patent: 7218779 (2007-05-01), Dodge et al.
patent: 7283670 (2007-10-01), Wakeam et al.
patent: 2001/0012401 (2001-08-01), Nagy
patent: 2002/0085002 (2002-07-01), Lamping et al.
patent: 2002/0133507 (2002-09-01), Holenstein et al.
patent: 2002/0191452 (2002-12-01), Fujihara
patent: 2003/0028851 (2003-02-01), Leung et al.
patent: 0902379 (1999-03-01), None
H. Kitakami et al., “A Constraint Solver for Reconciling Heterogeneous Trees,” IC-AI '00 International Conference, 2000, pp. 1419-1425.
M. van Veller et al., “Methods in Vicariance Biogeography: Assessment of the Implementations of Assumptions 0, 1, and 2,” Cladistics 16, 2000, pp. 319-345.
V. V'yugin et al., “Tree Reconciliation: Reconstruction of Species Phylogeny by Phylogenetic Gene Trees,” Molecular Biology, vol. 36, No. 5, 2002, pp. 650-658.
H. Prodinger, “Aq-Analog of the Path Length of Binary Search Trees,” Oct. 14, 1999, pp. 1-9.
R. Page, “Extracting Species Trees From Complex Gene Trees: Reconciled Trees And Vertebrate Phylogeny,” Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, vol. 14, No. 1, 2000, pp. 89-106.
M. van Veller et al., “Aposteriorianda priorimethodologies for testing hypotheses of causal processes in vicariance biogeography,” Willi Hennig Society, 2001, pp. 26.
A. Martin, “Choosing among Alternative Trees of Multigene Families,” Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, vol. 16, No. 3, 2000, pp. 430-439.
M.T. Hallett et al., “Efficient Algorithms for Lateral Gene Transfer Problems,” Recomb, 2001, pp. 149-156.
R. Neininger, “On binary search tree recursions with monomials as toll functions,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2002, pp. 185-196.
M. Hofri et al., “Efficient Reorganization of Binary Search Trees,” Proceedings of the 2ndItalian Conference on Algorithms and Complexity, 1994, pp. 1-25.
M. Hallett et al., “New Algorithms for the Duplication-Loss Model,” Recomb, 2000, pp. 138-146.
B. Ma et al., “From Gene Trees to Species Trees,” Second Annual International Conference on Computational Molecular Biology, 1998, pp. 1-29.
Miklós Csürös, “Fast recovery of evolutionary trees with thousands of nodes,” Department of Computer Science, Yale University, 2002, 36 pages.
Hajime Kitakami et al., “Constraint Satisfaction for Reconciling Heterogeneous Tree Databases,” DEXA 2000, LNCS 1873, pp. 624-633.
Ramachandran et al., “An Architecture for Ink Annotations on Web Documents,” Aug. 2003, vol. 1, pp. 256-260.
Gupta et al, “Robust Annotation Positioning in Digital Documents,” Pub. Sep. 22, 2000, ftp://ftp.research.microsoft.com/pub/tr/tr-2000-95.pdf.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Electronic ink processing does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Electronic ink processing, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Electronic ink processing will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4046189