Electronic ink processing

Image analysis – Pattern recognition – Unconstrained handwriting

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Reexamination Certificate

active

10646474

ABSTRACT:
A method of analyzing electronic ink, in which document data for a document containing electronic ink content is received from a software application running on a first processing thread. The first processing thread is employed to provide the document data to an electronic ink analysis process for analyzing on a second processing thread. Control of the first processing thread is then returned to the software application. After the results of the analysis are received, the results are reconciled with the current document data for the document.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5394484 (1995-02-01), Casey et al.
patent: 5455901 (1995-10-01), Friend et al.
patent: 5546538 (1996-08-01), Cobbley et al.
patent: 5559897 (1996-09-01), Brown et al.
patent: 5587560 (1996-12-01), Crooks et al.
patent: 5588147 (1996-12-01), Neeman et al.
patent: 5600834 (1997-02-01), Howard
patent: 5799315 (1998-08-01), Rainey et al.
patent: 5911013 (1999-06-01), Taniishi
patent: 6240414 (2001-05-01), Beizer et al.
patent: 6292857 (2001-09-01), Sidoroff et al.
patent: 6377259 (2002-04-01), Tenev et al.
patent: 6442555 (2002-08-01), Shmueli et al.
patent: 6603881 (2003-08-01), Perrone et al.
patent: 7106905 (2006-09-01), Simske
patent: 2001/0012401 (2001-08-01), Nagy
patent: 2002/0085002 (2002-07-01), Lamping et al.
patent: 2002/0133507 (2002-09-01), Holenstein et al.
patent: 2002/0191452 (2002-12-01), Fujihara
patent: 2003/0028851 (2003-02-01), Leung et al.
H. Kitakami et al., “A Constraint Solver for Reconciling Heterogeneous Trees,” IC-AI '00 International Conference, 2000, pp. 1419-1425.
M. van Veller et al., “Methods in Vicariance Biogeography: Assessment of the Implementations of Assumptions 0, 1, and 2,” Cladistics 16, 2000, pp. 319-345.
V. V'yugin et al., “Tree Reconciliation: Reconstruction of Species Phylogeny by Phylogenetic Gene Trees,” Molecular Biology, vol. 36, No. 5, 2002, pp. 650-658.
H. Prodinger, “Aq-Analog of the Path Length of Binary Search Trees,” Oct. 14, 1999, pp. 1-9.
R. Page, “Extracting Species Trees From Complex Gene Trees: Reconciled Trees And Vertebrate Phylogeny,” Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, vol. 14, No. 1, 2000, pp. 89-106.
M. van Veller et al., “Aposteriorianda priorimethodologies for testing hypotheses of casual processes in vicariance biogeography,” Willi Hennig Society, 2001, pp. 26.
A. Martin, “Choosing among Alternative Trees of Multigene Families,” Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, vol. 16, No. 3, 2000, pp. 430-439.
M.T. Hallett et al., “Efficient Algorithms for Lateral Gene Transfer Problems,” RECOMB, 2001, pp. 149-156.
R. Neininger, “On binary search tree recursions with monomials as toll functions,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2002, pp. 185-196.
M. Hofri et al., “Efficient Reorganization of Binary Search Trees,” Proceedings of the 2ndItalian Conference on Algorithms and Complexity, 1994, pp. 1-25.
M. Hallett et al., “New Algorithms for the Duplication-Loss Model,” RECOMB, 2000, pp. 138-146.
B. Ma et al., “From Gene Trees to Species Trees,” Second Annual International Conference on Computational Molecular Biology, 1998, pp. 1-29.
Miklós Csür ös, “Fast recovery of evolutionary trees with thousands of nodes,” Department of Computer Science, Yale University, 2002, 36 pages.
Hajime Kitakami et al., “Constraint Satisfaction for Reconciling Heterogeneous Tree Databases,” DEXA 2000, LNCS 1873, pp. 624-633.
Ramachandran et al., “An Architecture for Ink Annotations on Web Documents,” Aug. 2003, vol. 1, pp. 256-260.
Gupta et al, “Robust Annotation Positioning in Digital Documents,” Pub. Sep. 22, 2000, ftp://ftp.research.microsoft.com/pub/tr/tr-2000-95.pdf.
CN Office Action dtd Mar. 9, 2007, CN Appln. 03801887.X.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Electronic ink processing does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Electronic ink processing, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Electronic ink processing will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3856305

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.