Electronic document validation

Data processing: presentation processing of document – operator i – Presentation processing of document – Layout

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C715S252000

Reexamination Certificate

active

10339775

ABSTRACT:
Electronic documents are validated through application of a set of validation rules. One example of an electronic document to be validated has main data and view portions, wherein the main data portion can be parsed separately from the view portion, and the view portion includes presentation formatting for providing a display corresponding to the main data portion. There, the validation rules include comparison rules for determining whether a display provided by the view portion substantially matches the main data portion. Linking elements in the electronic document that point to corresponding information field in the view and main data portions can accommodate the matching comparison. Other types of validation rules include membership rules and reference identifier rules, and various document views corresponding to a given transaction can be separately validated.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5615268 (1997-03-01), Bisbee et al.
patent: 5748738 (1998-05-01), Bisbee et al.
patent: 6189009 (2001-02-01), Stratigos et al.
patent: 6209095 (2001-03-01), Anderson et al.
patent: 6237096 (2001-05-01), Bisbee et al.
patent: 6289460 (2001-09-01), Hajmiragha
patent: 6367013 (2002-04-01), Bisbee et al.
patent: 6438526 (2002-08-01), Dykes et al.
patent: 6452614 (2002-09-01), King et al.
patent: 6456981 (2002-09-01), Dejaeger et al.
patent: 6594633 (2003-07-01), Broerman
patent: 6609200 (2003-08-01), Anderson et al.
patent: 6635089 (2003-10-01), Burkett et al.
patent: 6751632 (2004-06-01), Petrogiannis
patent: 2001/0005829 (2001-06-01), Raveis
patent: 2001/0018739 (2001-08-01), Anderson et al.
patent: 2001/0029482 (2001-10-01), Tealdi et al.
patent: 2001/0044764 (2001-11-01), Thomas
patent: 2002/0010679 (2002-01-01), Felsher
patent: 2002/0019838 (2002-02-01), Petrogiannis
patent: 2002/0029194 (2002-03-01), Lewis et al.
patent: 2002/0035578 (2002-03-01), Stratigos et al.
patent: 2002/0049624 (2002-04-01), Raveis
patent: 2002/0052814 (2002-05-01), Ketterer
patent: 2002/0059137 (2002-05-01), Freeman et al.
patent: 2002/0069179 (2002-06-01), Slater et al.
patent: 2002/0069358 (2002-06-01), Silvester
patent: 2002/0073020 (2002-06-01), McFarland et al.
patent: 2002/0078159 (2002-06-01), Petrogiannis et al.
patent: 2002/0091651 (2002-07-01), Petrogiannis et al.
patent: 2002/0116321 (2002-08-01), Areheart
patent: 2002/0116331 (2002-08-01), Cataline et al.
patent: 2002/0116531 (2002-08-01), Chu
patent: 2002/0128969 (2002-09-01), Parmelee et al.
patent: 2002/0129256 (2002-09-01), Parmelee et al.
patent: 2002/0129257 (2002-09-01), Parmelee et al.
patent: 2002/0143711 (2002-10-01), Nassiri
patent: 2002/0169702 (2002-11-01), Eaton, Jr. et al.
patent: 2002/0178035 (2002-11-01), Lajouanie
patent: 2003/0009418 (2003-01-01), Green et al.
patent: 2003/0036994 (2003-02-01), Witzig et al.
patent: 2003/0055783 (2003-03-01), Cataline et al.
patent: 2003/0074297 (2003-04-01), Carragher
patent: 2003/0110400 (2003-06-01), Cartmell et al.
patent: 2003/0120588 (2003-06-01), Dodd et al.
patent: 2003/0144948 (2003-07-01), Cleary et al.
patent: 2003/0158811 (2003-08-01), Sanders et al.
patent: 2003/0172296 (2003-09-01), Gunter
patent: 2003/0172297 (2003-09-01), Gunter
patent: 2003/0172298 (2003-09-01), Gunter et al.
patent: 2003/0172299 (2003-09-01), Gunter
patent: 2003/0177071 (2003-09-01), Treese et al.
patent: 2003/0182151 (2003-09-01), Taslitz
patent: 2003/0208557 (2003-11-01), Higbee
patent: 2003/0225688 (2003-12-01), Dobbins
patent: 2003/0233418 (2003-12-01), Goldman
patent: 2004/0111619 (2004-06-01), Laurie et al.
patent: 2003256744 (2003-09-01), None
patent: WO0008541 (2000-02-01), None
patent: WO0019296 (2000-04-01), None
patent: WO0019315 (2000-04-01), None
patent: WO0049521 (2000-08-01), None
patent: WO0062140 (2000-10-01), None
patent: WO0127832 (2001-04-01), None
patent: WO0201479 (2002-01-01), None
patent: WO0203174 (2002-01-01), None
patent: WO0203774 (2002-01-01), None
patent: WO0221383 (2002-03-01), None
patent: WO0237367 (2002-05-01), None
patent: WO0237386 (2002-05-01), None
patent: WO02063431 (2002-08-01), None
patent: WO0275575 (2002-09-01), None
patent: WO02075615 (2002-09-01), None
patent: WO02075616 (2002-09-01), None
patent: WO02075617 (2002-09-01), None
patent: WO02075618 (2002-09-01), None
patent: WO03077130 (2003-09-01), None
“XML Schema Part 1: Structures”, W3C Recommendation May 2001, Thompson et al., Eds., pp. 1-3, 17-19, 134-136.
Yoder et al., “Architecture and Design of Adaptive Object-Models,” ACM SIGPLAN Notices, vol. 36, Issue 12, copyright 2000, ACM Press, p. 50-60.
“Smart Document Specification—RC6.6”, Mortage Bankers Association of America, Inc., Sep. 19, 2002, pp. 1-87.
“Guidelines for Document Custodians”, Fannie Mae, Sep. 9, 1999.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Electronic document validation does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Electronic document validation, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Electronic document validation will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3850558

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.