Image analysis – Applications – Reading bank checks
Reexamination Certificate
1997-02-27
2001-10-09
Patel, Jayanti K. (Department: 2623)
Image analysis
Applications
Reading bank checks
C235S379000, C705S045000, C902S038000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06301379
ABSTRACT:
TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed, in general, to electronic check presentment and, more specifically, to electronic check presentment systems and methods wherein improved volatile memory datastore access techniques are employed to increase check presentment processing efficiency without risking corruption or loss of the datastore.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Financial institutions (“FIs”), such as banks, have conventionally handled the transfer and presentment of negotiable instruments for payment in a manual, paper-based fashion. At specified times each day, “sending” FIs sorted all negotiable instruments presented to them by depositors and other correspondent FIs into bundles—each bundle containing the negotiable instruments for the particular FIs on which they are drawn.
The sorted bundles were then segregated into batches of negotiable instruments according to an assigned American Banking Association (“ABA”) routing/transit number (“R/T”) printed on the face of the negotiable instrument. These batches were then aggregated for shipment to the paying FI. A detailed listing and a cover letter (collectively, a “cash letter”) were attached to each such shipment. The cash letters presented the dollar amount of all negotiable instruments within the batch and summarized its accumulated dollar amount—the summary often included the names of the paying and sending FIs, the preassigned R/T associated with each of the same, the number of negotiable instruments in the batch and the total dollar amount of all of the negotiable instruments in the batch.
When the paying FI received the cash letter, it verified its contents (i.e., negotiable instrument amounts balanced with the totals contained on the cover letter), a process commonly referred to as “reconciliation.” If a balancing discrepancy existed (e.g., missing or extra negotiable instrument, amount or arithmetic error, etc.), the condition was documented and notification of the error was slated for the sending bank. Other conventional check processing and posting functions, commonly referred to as “Demand Deposit Accounting” (“DDA”), were then performed to determine whether any of the accounts on which the negotiable instruments were drawn were restricted (e.g., closed, dormant, stop payment, account holder deceased, etc.). If a particular account was not restricted, the paying FI determined whether there was enough money in the account (i.e., sufficient funds) to cover payment of a negotiable instrument drawn thereon. The paying FI, in response to these determinations, either accepted or rejected payment of the negotiable instrument, slating the reconciled negotiable instrument for return. The paying FI notified the sending FI of any balancing discrepancies, any negotiable instruments to be returned unpaid, or the like. The return to the sending FI was again accomplished by physical transportation of the negotiable instruments.
It became apparent as negotiable instrument volume (particularly, check volume) increased that conventional negotiable instrument processing methods required automation. To facilitate this automation, the ABA introduced a method of printing information on each negotiable instrument, commonly referred to as Magnetic Ink Character Reconciliation (“MICR”). The MICR method, which today uses a font known as “E13B,” is used to properly route and process each received negotiable instrument. The contents of the MICR line are specified in various American National Standards Institute (“ANSI”) publications.
Typically, there are six MICR fields defined: (1) dollar amount, (2) account number, (3) R/T number, (4) process control or serial number, (5) auxiliary on-us or serial number, and (6) external process code. The incorporation of MICR information on negotiable instruments improved the clearing process in terms of speed and flexibility—the cash letter process was automated, although the reconciliation process remained manual.
Automation also introduced reconciliation discrepancies such as (1) differences in processing equipment and software used by the various FIs, (2) a lack of quality control standards for MICR printing, and (3) exceptions caused by environmental conditions. To address some of these problems, and to further speed the clearing process, processing systems and, later, processing system networks (collectively, “processing environments”) were integrated therein allowing extracted MICR information to be used to create electronic payment transactions that are communicated between sending FIs and paying FIs.
Today, the electronic clearing process includes electronic check presentment (“ECP”), electronic data exchange (“EDE”), automated clearing houses (“ACH”), branch item capture (“BIC”) and check truncation. Each of these exemplary electronic sub-processes rely on the ability for one or more FIs to extract MICR information or other data from negotiable instruments, to convert the data to an electronic transaction, to apply the electronic transaction to an account for debiting purposes and, subsequently, to match the paper negotiable instrument to the electronic transaction for reconciliation purposes.
The types of processing environments employed in an FI's ECP process typically vary in functionality. For example, the circuitry used to read the information contained within a given MICR line varies with the type of equipment and the techniques used to recognize the magnetic and/or optical representation of the individual MICR symbols and numbers. To convert the paper negotiable instrument MICR information to an electronic item, the MICR information is typically scanned and formatted to conform to one of several standard electronic transaction formats. The electronic item is then grouped with other electronic items, similar to the cash letter process described hereinabove, and transmitted via data transmission means, possibly through intermediary FIs, such as Federal Reserve Banks (“FRBs”), to a paying FI. The paper negotiable instrument follows thereafter, usually traversing each of the same FIs through which the electronic item passed. Each FI matches the received paper negotiable instrument with the previously processed electronic transaction for reconciliation. Reconciliation verifies that the electronic item was received, that there was a corresponding paper negotiable instrument and that the MICR contents of the paper negotiable instrument were correctly extracted and processed.
The matching process is often unduly complicated by factors such as variability in the placement of the contents of the MICR line information from FI to FI, the condition and quality of the paper instrument (e.g., torn, folded, dog-eared, etc.), the condition of the scanning equipment from FI to FI, etc. In point of fact, the paper instrument and the corresponding electronic item often include the same information, but due to variability caused by one or more of the foregoing factors, the paper instrument is incorrectly identified as a mismatch causing the electronic item to be incorrectly processed. This introduces an unnecessary, and often significant, latency into the check clearing process. Conventional procedures for matching an electronic item with a corresponding paper instrument fail to rationalize the contents of the MICR line as scanned by each FI. These procedures also fail to provide an accurate method of comparing and determining match criteria of a negotiable instrument's MICR line as read and captured by one FI's equipment and subsequently read and captured by another FI's equipment.
To address these deficiencies, the invention described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,687,579 (“'579 Patent”), for the “Rule-Based Circuit, Method and System for Preforming Item Level Reconciliation,” which is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes, introduced systems and methods for reducing the amount of labor intensive, manual processes needed to perform reconciliation of electronically generated financial transactions. The '579 Patent provided a reconciling circuit, a
Gilson Jonathan C.
Josephson Stanley M.
Thompson Mitchell D.
Carreker-Antinori, Inc.
Patel Jayanti K.
LandOfFree
Electronic check presentment systems and methods employing... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Electronic check presentment systems and methods employing..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Electronic check presentment systems and methods employing... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2593954