Surgery – Diagnostic testing – Detecting brain electric signal
Reexamination Certificate
2005-12-22
2009-10-06
Hindenburg, Max (Department: 3736)
Surgery
Diagnostic testing
Detecting brain electric signal
C600S545000, C600S546000, C600S383000
Reexamination Certificate
active
07599735
ABSTRACT:
The invention relates to a method for positioning electrodes in an electrode array comprising a plurality of electrodes for central nervous system (CNS) monitoring from the forehead of a subject. In order to enable efficient detection of eye movement artifacts with a minimum number of electrodes, first and second electrodes are positioned so that eye movement in one of the horizontal or vertical directions causes a negligible overall voltage change between the first and second electrodes and at least a third electrode is positioned so that eye movement in the other of said horizontal and vertical directions causes a high potential difference between the third electrode and an auxiliary electrode, wherein the auxiliary electrode is one of the electrodes in a set comprising one of the first and second electrodes and a fourth electrode. The first and second electrodes are arranged to record an EEG signal and the third electrode and the auxiliary electrode are arranged to record an EOG signal indicative of eye movements of the subject.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4171696 (1979-10-01), John
patent: 4776345 (1988-10-01), Cohen et al.
patent: 6032065 (2000-02-01), Brown
patent: 6032072 (2000-02-01), Greenwald et al.
patent: 6394593 (2002-05-01), Komplin et al.
patent: 6394953 (2002-05-01), Devlin et al.
patent: 6934570 (2005-08-01), Kiani et al.
patent: 6950698 (2005-09-01), Sarkela et al.
patent: 2005/0004489 (2005-01-01), Sarkela et al.
patent: 1 493 383 (2005-01-01), None
patent: 1 516 581 (2005-03-01), None
patent: 99/38437 (1999-08-01), None
patent: 03/057030 (2003-07-01), None
patent: 2004/028365 (2004-04-01), None
Croft, Rodney, et al. “EOG correction: A comparison of four methods.” 2005. Psychophysiology, vol. 42 pp. 16-24.
Joyce, Carrie, et al. “Tracking eye fixations with electroocular and electroencephalographic recordings.” 2002. Psychophysiology, vol. 39 pp. 607-618.
Gratton, Gabrielle. “Dealing with artifacts: The EOG contamination of the event-related brain potential.” 1998. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers. 30(1) pp. 44-53.
European Search Report dated May 7, 2007.
Sampson Timothy
Viertiö-Oja Hanna E.
Andrus Sceales Starke & Sawall LLP
General Electric Company
Hindenburg Max
Pani John
LandOfFree
Electrode configuration for central nervous system monitoring does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Electrode configuration for central nervous system monitoring, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Electrode configuration for central nervous system monitoring will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4113772