Coherent light generators – Particular active media – Semiconductor
Reexamination Certificate
2001-03-15
2003-06-03
Davie, James (Department: 2828)
Coherent light generators
Particular active media
Semiconductor
C372S026000, C372S046012
Reexamination Certificate
active
06574260
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND
Semiconductor laser devices such as ridge waveguide lasers are used in many fiber optic communications systems. Incremental refinements in their fabrication and packaging have resulted in a class of devices that have acceptable performance characteristics and a well-understood long-term behavior. Moreover, the ridge waveguide structures are less complex to fabricate and provide excellent yields as compared to more complex architectures based on buried heterostructures, for example.
Single wavelength lasers have been essential in moderate and long distance (>10 km) fiber optic communication systems. Multimode or multi-wavelength optical transmitters suffer restrictions on the distance information can be sent since pulse spreading is proportional to the product of differential group delay of the fiber and optical bandwidth of the source. For this reason, lasers with multiple transverse modes, multiple lateral modes, or multiple longitudinal modes are to be avoided for moderate and long distance optical communications.
Distributed feedback (DFB) lasers are typically used as optical sources having robust singlemode output. However, direct modulation of a DFB laser tends to induce rapid modulation of the laser index and extensive shifting (or chirp) in the laser oscillation wavelength. Especially large changes in the properties of the laser material are required to rapidly extinguish and rebuild the photon density within the laser cavity on time scales of less than 100 ps. Direct modulated DFBs typically generate a factor of two excess in optical bandwidth. Thus, direct modulated DFBs have inadequate spectra for large signal modulation data rates of 10 Gbit/s and beyond.
Generally, several solutions have been adopted to avoid the chirp of direct modulation. External modulators (using such materials as LiNO
3
) have produced excellent chirp behavior. However, due to the dissimilarity of the laser and modulator structures, the complexity and thus the size and cost of the resulting transmitter is significantly increased when external modulation is used. Integrated laser and semiconductor Mach-Zehnder modulators have been demonstrated. However, results so far have shown that these devices have high insertion loss.
SUMMARY
Semiconductor waveguide modulators have been integrated with the laser chip to permit subsequent modulation after the laser cavity, eliminating the need to quench and regenerate the photon density within the laser cavity. These have been demonstrated in devices known as electroabsorption modulated lasers (EMLs).
There remains a continuing need for improvements to increase output power, efficiency and spectral characteristics for integrated laser modulator devices.
It would be useful to maintain the advantages of near optimum chirp behavior without trading off a significant fraction of DFB power (permitting one to get >5 mW from the modulator). It would also be useful to maintain the advantage of simple, cheap integration of source and modulator into a single chip.
Electroabsorption modulated laser devices in accordance with the present invention provide increased output power, higher quantum efficiency, and better spectral characteristics compared to typical integrated laser modulators.
According to one aspect of the present invention, an integrated electroabsorption modulated laser (EML) device includes a distributed feedback (DFB) laser and modulator. The DFB laser includes an active layer and a complex index grating. The modulator includes an active layer. The EML device includes a first electrical contact over the DFB laser and a second electrical contact over the modulator. The EML device includes a stop etch layer above the active layer of both the DFB laser and the modulator.
In another aspect, an integrated electroabsorption modulated laser (EML) device includes a distributed feedback (DFB) laser, an amplifier and a modulator and is referred to herein as an electroabsorption modulated partial grating laser (EMPGL) device.
In an embodiment of an EMPGL device, the DFB laser includes an active layer and a complex index grating. The amplifier includes an active layer and a grating-free region. The modulator includes an active layer. The EMPGL device includes a common electrical contact over the DFB laser and amplifier and has a separate electrical contact over the modulator. An ion implantation region in the EMPGL device provides electrical isolation between the DFB laser/amplifier and the modulator.
In another embodiment of an EMPGL device, the EMPGL device includes a modulator between a DFB laser and an amplifier. A first ion implantation region provides electrical isolation between the DFB laser and the modulator and a second ion implantation provides electrical isolation between the amplifier and the modulator. The EMPGL device has separate electrical contacts over the DFB laser, amplifier and modulator.
Additional features and advantages of the invention will be set forth in the detailed description which follows, and in part will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art from that description or recognized by practicing the invention as described herein, including the detailed description which follows, the claims, as well as the appended drawings.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are merely exemplary of the invention, and are intended to provide an overview or framework for understanding the nature and character of the invention as it is claimed. The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the invention, and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification. The drawings illustrate various embodiments of the invention, and together with the description serve to explain the principles and operation of the invention.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4101845 (1978-07-01), Russer
patent: 4622674 (1986-11-01), Mito
patent: 4675873 (1987-06-01), Miller
patent: 4829535 (1989-05-01), Utaka
patent: 4905253 (1990-02-01), Chraplyvy et al.
patent: 4961198 (1990-10-01), Ishino et al.
patent: 5019519 (1991-05-01), Tanaka et al.
patent: 5175643 (1992-12-01), Andrews
patent: 5184247 (1993-02-01), Schimpe
patent: 5212704 (1993-05-01), Chen et al.
patent: 5252839 (1993-10-01), Fouquet
patent: 5305343 (1994-04-01), Allovon et al.
patent: 5394260 (1995-02-01), Suzuki et al.
patent: 5548607 (1996-08-01), Tsang
patent: 5553091 (1996-09-01), Delorme
patent: 5568311 (1996-10-01), Matsumoto
patent: 5581572 (1996-12-01), Delorme et al.
patent: 5680411 (1997-10-01), Ramdane et al.
patent: 5748660 (1998-05-01), Delorme et al.
patent: 5838714 (1998-11-01), Delorme
patent: 5883914 (1999-03-01), Kinoshita
patent: 5894492 (1999-04-01), Welch et al.
patent: 6072812 (2000-06-01), Eng
patent: 6148017 (2000-11-01), Borchert et al.
patent: 6151351 (2000-11-01), Kito et al.
patent: 61-168980 (1986-07-01), None
Lu, H., et al., “Dynamic Properties of Partly Gain-Coupled 1.55-&mgr;m DFB Lasers,”IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, 31(8): 1443-1450 (Aug. 1995).
Shiao, H.P., et al., “High Performance and High Reliability of 1.55-&mgr;m Current-Blocking Grating Complex-Coupled DFB Lasers,”IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 10(9): 1238-1240 (Sep. 1998).
Hong, J., et al., “Impact of Random Facet Phases on Modal Properties of Partly Gain-Coupled Distributed-Feedback Lasers,”IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 3(2): 555-568 (Apr. 1997).
Morthier, G., et al., “Improved Performance of AR-Coated DFB Lasers by the Introduction of Gain Coupling,”IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 2(3): 170-172 (Mar. 1998).
Tarucha, S., and Okamoto, H., “Monolithic Integration of a Laser Diode and an Optical Waveguide Modulator Having a GaAs/AlGaAs Quantum Well Double Heterostructure,”Appl. Phys. Lett., 48(1): 1-3 (Jan. 6, 1986).
Li, G.P., et al., “Partly Gain-Coupled 1.55 &mgr;m Strained-Layer Multiquantum-Well DFB Lasers,”IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, 29(6): 1736-1742 (Jun. 1993).
Tsang, D.Z., et al., “Switching of Low-Threshold Buried-Heterostructure Diode Lasers at
Lu Hanh
Sahara Richard T.
Salvatore Randal A.
Corning Lasertron Incorporated
Davie James
Hamilton Brook Smith & Reynolds P.C.
LandOfFree
Electroabsorption modulated laser does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Electroabsorption modulated laser, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Electroabsorption modulated laser will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3114067