Optical: systems and elements – Optical amplifier – Correction of deleterious effects
Reexamination Certificate
2001-08-29
2004-04-27
Hellner, Mark (Department: 3662)
Optical: systems and elements
Optical amplifier
Correction of deleterious effects
C359S337500
Reexamination Certificate
active
06728026
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF INVENTION
The present invention relates to optical amplifiers for fiber optic networks, and, more particularly, to a dynamically tunable optical amplifier.
The present invention also relates to a light source, and, more particularly, to a tunable fiber light source.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Optical networks in which the signals are wavelength division multiplexed (“WDM”) require a uniform spectral distribution across all channels. As an optical signal traverses an optical network, however, the signal is subject to losses and nonlinear effects that result in signal attenuation and distortion. Therefore, amplifiers, such as erbium-doped fiber amplifiers (“EDFA's”), are typically placed approximately every 80 kilometers along an optical fiber to boost signal strength. However, such an amplifier has a non-uniform gain profile (as a function of wavelength), which, in turn, imposes a distortion on the signal power spectral distribution (as a function of wavelength). The gain profile of the optical amplifier changes as a function of the input power, as well. Optical amplifiers based on the Raman effect also exhibit spectral gain variations.
Static gain flattening filters (“SGFF's”) are often used to attenuate the signal power as a function of wavelength to achieve a substantially uniform power distribution. Static filters (otherwise known as passive filters), however, cannot adapt to dynamically changing conditions such as amplifier aging, temperature variations, channel add/drop, fiber loss, amplifier gain profile variations due to input power variations, and other changes in components along the transmission line. Moreover, the required filter shape is dependent upon system configuration, e.g., the spacing between amplifiers. Static filter characteristics cannot be modified to compensate for these changes without replacing the filter itself.
An automatic gain control (“AGC”) optical amplifier employs an SGFF, in conjunction with a variable optical attenuator (“VOA”), to achieve a constant gain profile over a wide spectrum. In these amplifiers, the output power per channel is proportional to optical input power, since the gain of the amplifier is a constant regardless of the input power to the amplifier.
FIG. 1
illustrates a typical configuration of an AGC amplifier
100
for WDM transmission systems and networks. It is a two-stage optical amplifier comprising, for example, two erbium-doped fiber amplifiers (“EDFA”) EDFA
1
102
and EDFA
2
104
. The first amplifier stage
102
(i.e., “gain stage”) may be considered a pre-amplifier and the second
104
a post-amplifier. Those skilled in the art will recognize that other types of optical amplifiers known in the art, e.g., semiconductor optical amplifiers or Raman amplifiers, may also be used for the amplifier stages. Moreover, as is well known in the art, EDFA's and other amplifiers typically incorporate a pump laser (not shown). These amplifier stages have spectral transfer functions (otherwise known as transmission vs. wavelength profiles, gain profiles, or gain curves, among other terms) that are not uniform as a function of wavelength.
A static gain flattening filter
106
, a variable optical attenuator
108
, and a dispersion compensating fiber (“DCF”)
110
are located between the two amplifier stages. Each stage of the optical amplifier provides a constant gain regardless of the input power to the amplifier. The constant gain can be maintained by changing the pump power for each amplifier stage as a function of the input power. Typically, the higher the input power, the higher the pump power that is required to maintain a constant gain. A higher pump power, however, causes a higher noise level within the amplifier stage.
At a particular gain level, each amplifier stage has a nonuniform spectral gain profile. The static gain flattening filter
106
is used to flatten the gain of the amplifier using a fixed gain profile based on the amplifier stages' known nonuniform gain profiles. The gain of each stage is kept constant because varying the gain would change the spectral profile, thereby requiring a different SGFF. Instead of varying the gain of the amplifier stages to maintain a constant output power per channel, a controller
112
of the AGC amplifier
100
varies the attenuation level of the VOA
108
to adjust the gain of the entire amplifier. The VOA attenuation level decreases/increases, when the input power decreases/increases. In addition, the optical power into the DCF
110
should be less than −3 dBm/ch to avoid signal distortion due to optical nonlinearities in the DCF
110
.
Although the AGC amplifier
100
can provide a constant output power for a wide range of input power, a drawback of the AGC amplifier is the large noise generated in the amplifier. To describe the loss contributors, consider, for example, an amplifier that has a range of gains from 16 dB (compensating an 80 km span of optical fiber having 0.2 dB/km loss) to 28 dB (compensating a 100 km span of optical fiber having 0.28 dB/km loss). The amplifier is designed to have a maximum 28 dB gain. The gain of the first stage amplifier
102
, the insertion loss of the static gain flattening filter
106
, the loss of the variable attenuator
108
, the loss of the DCF
110
, and the gain of the second stage amplifier
104
are 15 dB, 1 dB, 2 dB, 7 dB, and 23 dB, respectively.
FIG. 2
illustrates the power levels along the amplifier module
100
. For a maximum gain of 28 dB, if one assumes that the output power per channel required of the amplifier is 5 dBm/ch, the input power of the first stage amplifier
102
is −23 dBm/ch, and that of the second stage amplifier
104
is −18 dBm/ch. Because the input power into the first stage amplifier
102
is much smaller that that of the second stage amplifier
104
, the noise of the first stage amplifier
102
is dominant with respect to the output noise.
On the other hand, if the input power is −11 dBm/channel, then a gain of 16 dB is required to achieve the same output power per channel of 5 dBm/ch. In this case, the input power of the first stage amplifier
102
is −23 dBm/ch, and that of the second stage amplifier
104
is −18 dBm/ch. Because the gain of each amplifier stage is constant regardless of input power, the AGC amplifier requires that the loss of the variable attenuator
108
be increased to 14 dB to achieve the same output power. In this case, the noise of the amplifier is dominated by the noise generated from the second stage
104
, if one assumes the same noise figure for the two amplifiers. In other words, the contribution of the second stage amplifier
104
to the output noise power is five times that of the first stage amplifier
102
. Thus, the AGC amplifier provides a high noise figure when it is operated to have a wide gain dynamic range. The origin of the high noise figure is the large amount of attenuation induced by the variable optical attenuator
108
and the DCF
110
. Note that the input power to the DCF
110
is −11 dBm/ch regardless of the input power to the optical amplifier.
The gain dynamic range of the amplifier is equal to the input power dynamic range, since the output power of the amplifier is desired to be constant. If one specifies an amplifier noise figure, the dynamic range of the AGC amplifier is limited. In other words, it is better to design a different amplifier for 16 dB gain, instead of using the amplifier designed for 28 dB gain with a 12 dB dynamic range. More generally, a different design of the AGC amplifier for a different gain is required for satisfactory noise performance.
It would be advantageous to provide an optical amplifier that can maintain a desired output power per channel and a desired gain profile over a wide dynamic range. It would also be advantageous to provide an optical fiber light source that can produce a desired output spectrum using similar technology.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides an optical amplifier comprising a wavelength tunable filter, one or
Baik Jin-Serk
Kim Byoung Yoon
Kim Hyo Sang
Lee Chang-Hee
Park Kun-Youl
Blakely , Sokoloff, Taylor & Zafman LLP
Hellner Mark
Novera Optics, Inc.
LandOfFree
Dynamically tunable optical amplifier and fiber optic light... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Dynamically tunable optical amplifier and fiber optic light..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Dynamically tunable optical amplifier and fiber optic light... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3272007