Multiplex communications – Data flow congestion prevention or control – Flow control of data transmission through a network
Reexamination Certificate
2005-03-15
2009-11-10
Rao, Seema S (Department: 2416)
Multiplex communications
Data flow congestion prevention or control
Flow control of data transmission through a network
C370S392000, C370S401000
Reexamination Certificate
active
07616574
ABSTRACT:
A technique dynamically triggers an exchange of reachability information between a tail-end (remote) domain target node (e.g., a tail-end node) of a traffic engineering (TE) label switched path (LSP) and a local domain head-end node of the TE-LSP in a computer network. The inter-domain information retrieval technique is illustratively based on triggering a Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) session whereby at least a portion of the reachability, i.e., routing, information of the tail-end node is transmitted to the head-end node of the TE-LSP in accordance with BGP. Specifically, once a TE-LSP is established between the head-end node and the tail-end node, the head-end node triggers the tail-end node, e.g., through extensions to a request/response signaling exchange, to establish the BGP session. Establishment of the BGP session enables transmission of the routing information from the tail-end node to the head-end node. The head-end node uses the routing information to calculate routes, i.e., address prefixes and associated attributes, reachable from the tail-end node for insertion into its routing table.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5088032 (1992-02-01), Bosack
patent: 6392997 (2002-05-01), Chen
patent: 6473421 (2002-10-01), Tappan
patent: 6567380 (2003-05-01), Chen
patent: 6584093 (2003-06-01), Salama et al.
patent: 6603756 (2003-08-01), Tappan
patent: 6643706 (2003-11-01), Marques et al.
patent: 6665273 (2003-12-01), Goguen et al.
patent: 2001/0025319 (2001-09-01), Takashima et al.
patent: 2001/0053131 (2001-12-01), Geens
patent: 2004/0034702 (2004-02-01), He
patent: 2004/0081154 (2004-04-01), Kouvelas
patent: 2004/0215820 (2004-10-01), Blair
patent: 2005/0050225 (2005-03-01), Tatman
Rekhter, Y., RFC 1771, entitled A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4), Mar. 1995, pp. 1-54.
PCT Notification of Transmittal of The International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, mailed Aug. 9, 2007, International Application No. PCT/US06/09072, International Filing Date: Mar. 14, 2006, 5 pages.
PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, mailed Aug. 9, 2007, International Application No. PCT/US06/09072, International Filing Date: Mar. 14, 2006, 7 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/767,574, filed Sep. 18, 2003, Vasseur et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/983,280, filed Nov. 5, 2004, Vasseur et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/001,459, filed Dec. 1, 2004, Vasseur et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/001,349, filed Dec. 1, 2004, Vasseur et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/049,587, filed Feb. 2, 2005, Vasseur et al.
Callon, R., RFC 1195, entitled Use of OSI ISIS for routing in TCP/IP and Dual Environments, Dec. 1990, pp. 1-80.
Rekhter, Y., RFC 1771, entitled A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4), Mar. 1995, pp. 1-28.
Braden, R. et al., RFC 2205, entitled Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP), Version 1 Functional Specification, Sep. 1997, pp. 1-112.
Moy, J., RFC 2328, entitled OSPF Version 2, Apr. 1998, pp. 1-183.
Awduche, D. et al., RFC 3209, entitled RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels, Dec. 2001, pp. 1-43.
Berger, L., RFC 3473, entitled Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) Extensions, Jan. 2003, pp. 1-14.
Katz, D. et al., RFC 3630, entitled Traffic Engineering (TE) Extensions to OSPF Version 2, Sep. 2003, pp. 1-14.
Smit, H., RFC 3784, entitled Intermediate-System-to-Intermediate-System (IS-IS) Extensions for Traffic Engineering (TE), Jun. 2004, pp. 1-13.
Mannie, E., RFC 3945, entitled Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Architecture, Oct. 2004, pp. 1-65.
Mannie, E., RFC 3946, entitled Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Extensions for Synchronous Optical Network (SONET) and Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH) Control, Oct. 2004, pp. 1-25.
Farrel, A., et al., Network Working Group Internet Draft, entitled Encoding of Attributes for Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Lable Switched Path (LSP)Establishment Using RSVP-TE, Jul. 2004, pp. 1-18.
Vasseur, J. P. et al., OSPF Work Working Group Internet Draft, entitled OSPF MPLS Traffic Engineering Capabilities (draft-vasseur-ospf-te-caps-00.txt), Jul. 2004, pp. 1-14.
Vasseur, J. P., et al., Network Working Group Internet Draft, entitled RSVP Path Computation Request and Reply Messages (draft-vasseur-mpls-computation-rsvp-05.txt), Jul. 2004, pp. 1-31.
Perlman, Radia, Interconnections Second Edition: Bridges, Routers, Switches, and Internetworking Protocols, Addison Wesley, 1999, Section 12.2.4, pp. 317-319.
Pelsser, Cristel et al., “On the Difficulty of Establishing Interdomain LSPs,” IP Operations and Management, Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Beijing, China, Oct. 11-13, 2004, Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE, Oct. 11, 2004, pp. 134-139.
Supplementary European Search Report, European Application No. 06738161.6-1249/1859574, PCT/US2006009072, Jul. 31, 2008, pp. 1-9.
Previdi Stefano B.
Vasseur Jean-Philippe
Cesari and McKenna LLP
Cisco Technology Inc.
Davenport Mon Cheri S
Rao Seema S
LandOfFree
Dynamic retrieval of routing information for inter-AS TE-LSPs does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Dynamic retrieval of routing information for inter-AS TE-LSPs, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Dynamic retrieval of routing information for inter-AS TE-LSPs will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4091674