Prosthesis (i.e. – artificial body members) – parts thereof – or ai – Leg – Ankle
Reexamination Certificate
2002-08-22
2004-03-09
McDermott, Corrine (Department: 3738)
Prosthesis (i.e., artificial body members), parts thereof, or ai
Leg
Ankle
C623S055000, C623S053000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06702859
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates, generally, to the art of prosthetics. More particularly, it relates to improvements in prosthetic feet.
2. Description of the Prior Art
During normal ambulation, the first part of a foot to contact the ground is the free end of the heel. This initial contact between heel and ground is known as the “heel strike.” The free end of the heel is soft and thus cushions the heel strike to at least some extent. The hard bottom of the heel is the next part of the foot to strike the ground; its hardness allows it to support the entire weight of the body. The foot continues to rotate in the well-known way until the toes “push off” at the end of a step.
Early prosthetic feet were quite rigid and provided little or no cushion to the impact on the ground at the moment of “heel strike” and little or no elastic response at “push off.” The shock of impact was thus transmitted directly to the skeletal structure of the user, and the lack of elastic response forced an unnatural gait.
Perhaps the earliest prosthetic foot that provided an elastic response at heel strike and push off is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,547,913 to Phillips, assigned to Flex Foot, Inc. Multiple versions of that device have been developed. The original version is formed of a carbon fiber epoxy matrix consisting of a one-piece combination pylon upper and a one-piece sole. Mechanical fasteners interconnect the upper and the sole. In a second embodiment, the pylon is a round hollow tube and is connected by mechanical fasteners to a rectangular-shaped upper. A third version is like the first except that a standard Sach® foot adapter is employed to connect a standard prosthetic pylon. A fourth version is like the third but has a slightly different geometry. In a fifth version, an elastomeric glue connects the upper and the sole. In additional embodiments, leaf springs or hydraulic cylinders are incorporated into the prosthetic foot.
Although the developments in the art since the mid 1980s have significantly advanced the technology of prosthetic feet, the known prosthetic feet still provide little or no heel elasticity in a direction parallel to the ground. Instead, they provide elastic response in a vertical plane. Thus, although the impact at heel strike is reduced vis a vis the pre-1980's prosthetic feet, the reduced impact is transmitted vertically to the skeletal structure of the user, and the elastic response in a vertical plane causes a four to six millimeter bounce at heel strike. This vertical response causes an unnatural walk because a healthy human heel is soft at the back or free end where heel strike occurs and is hard on the bottom so that it can support the entire weight of the body. Thus, the normal gait of a human includes a rolling motion as the back of the heel strikes the ground; there is no vertical motion causing the heel to bounce upon ground impact. Accordingly, there remains a need for a prosthetic foot that provides substantial heel elasticity in a direction parallel to the ground.
A healthy human foot rolls on the lateral part of the foot during ambulation. The medial part of the foot provides a cushion and the force required at push off. Thus, there is a smooth transition from heel strike to push off, with no vertical dynamic response of the type that could cause the foot to bounce. Prosthetic feet of the type heretofore known, however, do not provide a smooth transition from heel strike to push off. This lack of a smooth transition produces what is known in the industry as a “flat spot.” The presence of a flat spot between heel strike and push off produces an unnatural gait.
More particularly, the dynamic response is primarily vertical at the heel and the toe of a prosthetic foot. There is little or no component of the dynamic response in a horizontal plane as present in a healthy natural foot. The absence of dynamic response in a horizontal plane results in a step like motion going from an elastic vertical motion at heel strike to little or no support at mid-stance (the flat spot), and then again to an elastic vertical motion at push off.
There is a need, therefore, for a prosthetic foot having a dynamic response in a horizontal plane during heel strike, that provides a smooth transition between heel strike and push off to eliminate the flat spot, and that provides a dynamic response in a horizontal plane during push off.
The human foot provides a more rigid support laterally than medially. This design is advantageous because when an instability occurs, the weight of the person shifts from the rigid outer or lateral edge of the foot to the less rigid inner or medial edge. In this way, the prosthetic foot takes advantage of the presence of the natural foot, i.e., the lateral-to-medial motion experienced at the moment of an instability shifts additional support duties to the natural foot. One major drawback of the heretofore known prosthetic feet is the fact that such feet provide an exactly vertical response during ambulation with no component toward the medial section of the foot. Thus, if an instability in one foot urges the person to fall away from the natural foot, there is no shift of weight toward the medial part of the prosthetic foot as would occur in a natural foot, and the likelihood of a fall is substantially increased.
A prosthetic foot is therefore needed that has differentiated medial and lateral stiffness so that it can respond to instabilities in much the same way as a natural foot.
However, in view of the prior art considered as a whole at the time the present invention was made, it was not obvious to those of ordinary skill in the pertinent art how the identified needs could be fulfilled.
SUMMARY OF INVENTION
The long-standing but heretofore unfulfilled need for a dynamic prosthetic foot is now met by a new, useful, and nonobvious prosthetic foot having multiple load points and a pair of upper sections that are divided into an anterior upper section and a posterior upper section. The novel prosthetic foot includes a sole having a heel end and a toe end that are in substantially coplanar relation to one another and a pair of upper sections disposed normal to the sole. The upper sections are formed by longitudinally splitting an upper member having a heel end, a toe end, and a pair of flat, transversely spaced apart, pylon supports formed in its heel end. A first upper section is positioned toward the toe end of the foot in anterior relation to a second upper section that is positioned toward the heel end of the foot in posterior relation to the anterior section.
The heel end of each upper section has a gradual ninety degree bend formed therein so that the pylon supports are disposed substantially perpendicular to the sole. A transversely disposed parting line is formed where each pylon support separates from the sole.
Each pylon support is formed integrally with its associated upper section. The pylon supports include a lateral, anterior pylon support and a medial, posterior pylon support. An elongate slot is formed in the heel end of the upper member, substantially coincident with a longitudinal axis of the prosthetic foot. The slot extends from an uppermost end of the heel end of the upper member to a preselected point that is about two-thirds of the way from the heel of the sole to the toe of the sole.
Forces acting on the lateral pylon support are substantially confined to the lateral section of the upper member and forces acting on the medial pylon support are substantially confined to the medial section of the upper member.
Moreover, forces applied to the lateral, anterior pylon support are shifted in a posterior direction to the medial, posterior pylon support to mimic the operation of the fibula and tibia in a natural leg. The lateral, anterior pylon support performs the function of a fibula and the medial, posterior pylon support performs the function of a tibia. The lateral, anterior pylon support has a greater thickness than the medial, posterior pylon support and the medial member. The greater
McDermott Corrine
Smith Ronald E.
Smith & Hopen , P.A.
Stewart Alvin
LandOfFree
Dynamic prosthetic foot with multiple load points and... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Dynamic prosthetic foot with multiple load points and..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Dynamic prosthetic foot with multiple load points and... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3208877