Dynamic partial function in measurement of similarity of...

Image analysis – Pattern recognition – Feature extraction

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C382S305000, C707S793000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07106903

ABSTRACT:
A method of measuring similarity of a first object represented by first set of feature values to a second object represented by a second set of feature values, comprising determining respective feature distance values between substantially all corresponding feature values of the first and second sets of feature values, selecting a subset of the determined feature distance values in which substantially all feature distance values that are selected to be within the subset are smaller in value than feature distance values that are not selected to be within the subset, and summing the feature distance values in the subset to produce a partial feature distance measure between the first and second objects.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5559895 (1996-09-01), Lee et al.
patent: 5642294 (1997-06-01), Taniguchi et al.
patent: 5652829 (1997-07-01), Hong
patent: 6295514 (2001-09-01), Agrafiotis et al.
patent: 6704725 (2004-03-01), Lee
C. C. Aggarwal et al., “On the Surprising Behavior of Distance Metrics in High Dimensional Space”, LNCS 1973, pp. 420-431, ICDT Conference Proceedings, 2001.
E. Y. Chang et al., “Toward Perception-Based Image Retrieval”, IEEE, Content-Based Access of Image and Video Libraries, pp. 101-105, Jun. 2000.
M. Flickner et al., “Query by Image and Video Content: The QBIC System”, IEEE Computer, 28 (9): 23-32, Sep. 1995.
J. Flusser et al., “On the Calculation of Image Moments”, research report No. 1946, Jan. 1999, 12 pgs.
R. L. Goldstone, “Similarity, Interactive Activation and Mapping”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1994, vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 3-28.
A. Hinneburg et al., “What is the nearest neighbor in high dimensional spaces?”, VLDB Journal, pp. 506-515, 2000.
K. A. Hua et al., “SamMatch: A Flexible and Efficient Sampling -Based Image Retrieval Technique for Large Image Databases”, Proceedings of ACM Multimedia, Nov. 1999, pp. 225-234.
Y. Ishikawa et al., “MindReader: Querying databases through multiple examples”, VLDB, 1998, pp. 218-227.
JiaGuu Leu, “Computing a Shape's Moments from its Boundary”, Pattern Recognition, vol. 24, No. 10, 1991, pp. 949-957.
J. Li et al., “IRM: Integrated Region Matching for Image Retrieval”, Proceedings ACM Multimedia 2000, LA, CA, Oct. 30-Nov. 4, 2000, pp. 147-156.
D. L. Medin et al., “Respects for Similarity”, Psychological Review, 1993, vol. 100, No. 2, pp. 254-278.
G. L. Murphy et al., “The Role of Theories in Conceptual Coherence”, Psychological Review, vol. 92, No. 3, Jul. 1985.
M. Ortega et al., “Supporting Similarity Queries in MARS”, Proc. of ACM Conf. on Multimedia, 1997, pp. 403-413.
K. Porkaew et al., “Query Reformulation for Content Based Multimedia Retrieval in MARS”, IEEE 1999, pp. 747-751.
M. W. Richardson, “Multidimensional Psychophysics”, Psychological Bulletin, 35:659-660, 1938.
J. R. Smith et al., “Automated Image Retrieval Using Color and Texture”, Columbia University Technical Report TR# 414-95-20, Jul. 1995, 27 pgs.
J. R. Smith, “Integrated Spatial and Feature Image Systems: Retrieval, Analysis and Compression”, Columbia University PhD Thesis, 1997.
J. R. Smith et al., “Tools and Techniques for Color Image Retrieval”, SPIE vol. 2670, 1996, pp. 426-437.
H. Tamura et al., “Textural Features Corresponding to Visual Perception”, IEEE 1978, pp. 460-473.
A. Tversky et al., “Features of Similarity”, Psychological Review, vol. 84, No. 4, Jul. 1977, pp. 327-353.
X. S. Zhou et al., “Comparing Discriminating Transformations and SVM for Learning during Multimedia Retrieval”, Pros of ACM Conf. on Multimedia, pp. 137-146, 2001.
B. A. Wandell, “Foundations of Vision”, Stanford University, 1995, book.
I. H. Witten et al., “Managing Gigabytes”, Van Nostrand Reinhold N.Y. publisher, 1994, book.
P. Wu et al., “A texture descriptor for browsing and similarity retrieval”, Signal Processing Image Communication 16 (2000) 33-43.
G. Salton editor, The Smart Retrieval System Experiments in Automatic Document Processing, Prentice-Hall, Inc. New Jersey, 1971, book.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Dynamic partial function in measurement of similarity of... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Dynamic partial function in measurement of similarity of..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Dynamic partial function in measurement of similarity of... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3607768

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.