Dynamic individual phone rates

Details Dynamic individual phone rates Dynamic individual phone rates

2000-03-09

2002-10-29

Barnie, Rexford (Department: 2643)

Telephonic communications

With usage measurement

Call charge metering or monitoring

C379S121040, C379S114020, C379S114100, C379S114120, C379S130000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06473499

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND
A. Technical Field
The present invention relates generally to the field of establishing communication rates for communication systems, and more specifically to a system and method for dynamically determining phone rates for an individual customer.
B. Background of the Invention
Phone consumers have many choices for long distance vendors as well as various options for alternative vendors for voice communications through satellite, cable operators, and internet telephony. Choosing the lowest cost carrier for a call is a difficult task involving predicting a calling pattern and matching the many calls against the complex rate plans of the different vendors to determine the lowest average cost. As a result, consumers often do a simple comparison on their more common call destinations and choose a carrier on this basis.
Many communication vendor pricing plans such as MCI Friends and Family™ and AT&T One Rate™ take advantage of this behavior. This type of pricing plan is not unique to the communication industry but is the rationale behind supermarket loss-leader advertising. However, such pricing plans are traditionally geared to the public in general or specific groups, or if individualized, was in the form of a specific exception to the rate plan.
The emergence of multiple transport and gateway vendors along with advances in billing technology, especially with pre-paid phones, allow highly individualized rate plans tailored to the calling pattern of the caller.Accordingly it is desirable to provide a system and method that can determine a telephone call rate for various destinations based on the calling patterns of a consumer.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention overcomes the deficiencies and limitations of the prior art with a unique system and method for determining an individual phone rate for a user from an originating device to a destination device. The system for determining an individual phone rate for a user preferably comprises a user calling pattern information module, a destination gateway provider module, a margin multiplier calculator module, and an individual rate calculator module. The user calling pattern information module stores information about the user such as the destinations the user calls or desires to call frequently and the percentage of time the user calls or plans to call the frequently called destinations. Such information may be inputted directly from the user or may be determined from the user's historical billing records. The destination gateway provider information module stores information relating to the cost and profit margin of the provider servicing the connection to the destination device. For example, the destination gateway provider may store such information as the fixed cost for establishing a connection to the destination device as well as the normal margin for a call to the destination device. The margin multiplier calculator module determines a margin multiplier for a call by the user to the destination device. The individual rate calculator module uses the margin multiplier, the destination gateway provider information, and the user calling pattern information to determine a call rate to the destination for the user. In one embodiment, the call rate to the destination is determined by multiplying the margin multiplier with the normal margin for the call to the destination and adding the result to the fixed cost of the call to the destination.
The margin multiplier may be determined in a number of ways depending on the interest and business goals of the communication service provider. Additionally, a margin multiplier for selected desirable destinations and for other non-selected destinations may be calculated. In one embodiment, the margin multiplier is determined using a two-tier rate plan. In another embodiment, the margin multiplier is determined using a linear rate plan. A minimum margin multiplier may also be used to calculate the margin multiplier. In another embodiment, the margin multiplier is determined using an exponential ratio.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention may be better understood by considering the following detailed description of preferred embodiments of the invention. In the course of this description, reference will be frequently made to the attached drawings.


REFERENCES:
patent: 4538030 (1985-08-01), Fossett et al.
patent: 4888822 (1989-12-01), Weinberger et al.
patent: 5187710 (1993-02-01), Chau et al.
patent: 5303297 (1994-04-01), Hillis
patent: 5400395 (1995-03-01), Berenato
patent: 5420914 (1995-05-01), Blumhardt
patent: 5425085 (1995-06-01), Weinberger et al.
patent: 5473630 (1995-12-01), Penzias et al.
patent: 5519769 (1996-05-01), Weinberger et al.
patent: 5553131 (1996-09-01), Minervino, Jr. et al.
patent: 5570417 (1996-10-01), Byers
patent: 5627887 (1997-05-01), Freedman
patent: 5638433 (1997-06-01), Bubien, Jr. et al.
patent: 5659601 (1997-08-01), Cheslog
patent: 5715305 (1998-02-01), Penzias et al.
patent: 5781620 (1998-07-01), Montgomery et al.
patent: 5790642 (1998-08-01), Taylor et al.
patent: 5793854 (1998-08-01), Kashepava
patent: 5799071 (1998-08-01), Azar et al.
patent: 5802502 (1998-09-01), Gell et al.
patent: 5822414 (1998-10-01), Reding et al.
patent: 5844972 (1998-12-01), Jagadish et al.
patent: 5862339 (1999-01-01), Bonnaure et al.
patent: 5878122 (1999-03-01), White et al.
patent: 5881139 (1999-03-01), Romines
patent: 5896445 (1999-04-01), Kay et al.
patent: 5915005 (1999-06-01), He
patent: 5917897 (1999-06-01), Johnson et al.
patent: 6134589 (2000-10-01), Hultgren
patent: 6199047 (2001-03-01), Dimino et al.
Baker, D., Washburn, B., “Bill of Sales”, America's Network, Apr. 1, 1997, pp. 17-19, and 22.
Seungjae, S., et al., “Case Study: How to Make Telecom Pricing Strategy Using Data Warehouse Approach”, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. VI, Jan. 1998, pp. 55-60.
Strathmeyer, Carl R., ,“An Introduction to Computer Technology”, IEEE Communications Magazine, May 1996, pp. 106-111.
Engerbretsen, Jenni R., “Find a Cheap Phone Plan on the Web”, Money, May 1998, p. 148.
Wallace, Bob, “AT&T Gives Users Maximum Advantage”, Network World, Aug. 9, 1993, p. 29.
O'Shea, Dan, “GTE Airfone Seeks Higher Altitude”, Telephony, Nov. 18, 1996, p. 50.
Songhurst, D., Kelly, F., “Charging Schemes for Multiservice Networks”, Teletraffic Contributions for the Information Age, Proceedings of the 15thInternational Teletraffic Congress Jun. 1997, vol. 2b, pp. 781-790.
Wray, Nicholas, “Negotiate Better Phone Rate”, Datamation, Feb. 1998, pp. 79-81.
Concerning Home Telematics, Proceedings of the IFIP TC 9 Conference on Social implications of Home Interactive Telematics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Jun. 24-27, Jun. 1987, pp. 63-76.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Dynamic individual phone rates does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Dynamic individual phone rates, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Dynamic individual phone rates will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2960169