Dynamic document context mark-up technique implemented over...

Data processing: database and file management or data structures – Database and file access – Post processing of search results

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C707S731000, C707S738000, C707S739000, C707S740000, C707S767000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07818319

ABSTRACT:
Various techniques are disclosed for generating markup information to be displayed on a client computer system. A document (e.g. a web page) is selected for viewing via a web browser on the client system. Selected information relating to the document is parsed and analyzed using selected keyword information. In a specific implementation, the selected keyword information is provided by an entity other than the end user. Using the selected keyword information, specific context in the document is selected to be marked up. Markup operations may be implemented on at least a portion of the selected document context and displayed at the client system.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5603025 (1997-02-01), Tabb et al.
patent: 5694594 (1997-12-01), Chang
patent: 5740549 (1998-04-01), Reilly et al.
patent: 5764906 (1998-06-01), Edelstein et al.
patent: 5815830 (1998-09-01), Anthony
patent: 5822539 (1998-10-01), van Hoff
patent: 5826025 (1998-10-01), Gramlich
patent: 5903889 (1999-05-01), De La Huerga et al.
patent: 5995943 (1999-11-01), Bull et al.
patent: 6061659 (2000-05-01), Murray
patent: 6081829 (2000-06-01), Sidana
patent: 6092074 (2000-07-01), Rodkin et al.
patent: 6098065 (2000-08-01), Skillen et al.
patent: 6122647 (2000-09-01), Horowitz et al.
patent: 6141010 (2000-10-01), Hoyle
patent: 6144944 (2000-11-01), Kurtzman, II et al.
patent: 6256631 (2001-07-01), Malcolm
patent: 6266681 (2001-07-01), Guthrie
patent: 6285987 (2001-09-01), Roth et al.
patent: 6311194 (2001-10-01), Sheth et al.
patent: 6317781 (2001-11-01), De Boor et al.
patent: 6334145 (2001-12-01), Adams et al.
patent: 6421733 (2002-07-01), Tso et al.
patent: 6434657 (2002-08-01), Brown
patent: 6507837 (2003-01-01), De La Huerga et al.
patent: 6516321 (2003-02-01), De La Huerga et al.
patent: 6578078 (2003-06-01), Smith et al.
patent: 6581065 (2003-06-01), Rodkin et al.
patent: 6606652 (2003-08-01), Cohn et al.
patent: 6725227 (2004-04-01), Li
patent: 6742163 (2004-05-01), Ono et al.
patent: 6748385 (2004-06-01), Rodkin et al.
patent: 6757661 (2004-06-01), Blaser et al.
patent: 6785740 (2004-08-01), Yoneda et al.
patent: 6848077 (2005-01-01), McBrearty et al.
patent: 6862710 (2005-03-01), Marchisio
patent: 6968332 (2005-11-01), Milic-Frayling et al.
patent: 7110993 (2006-09-01), Soulanille et al.
patent: 7149698 (2006-12-01), Guheen et al.
patent: 7165041 (2007-01-01), Guheen et al.
patent: 7257585 (2007-08-01), Stevenson et al.
patent: 7284008 (2007-10-01), Henkin et al.
patent: 7313588 (2007-12-01), Shotton et al.
patent: 7315826 (2008-01-01), Guheen et al.
patent: 7437725 (2008-10-01), Chang et al.
patent: 7451099 (2008-11-01), Henkin et al.
patent: 7478089 (2009-01-01), Henkin et al.
patent: 7493553 (2009-02-01), Vora et al.
patent: 2002/0052925 (2002-05-01), Kim et al.
patent: 2002/0065136 (2002-05-01), Day
patent: 2002/0107735 (2002-08-01), Henkin et al.
patent: 2002/0120505 (2002-08-01), Henkin et al.
patent: 2002/0123912 (2002-09-01), Subramanian et al.
patent: 2002/0143808 (2002-10-01), Miller et al.
patent: 2003/0208483 (2003-11-01), Satomi et al.
patent: 2004/0059708 (2004-03-01), Dean et al.
patent: 2005/0004909 (2005-01-01), Stevenson et al.
patent: 2005/0149395 (2005-07-01), Henkin et al.
patent: 2008/0016059 (2008-01-01), Henkin et al.
patent: 2008/0046415 (2008-02-01), Henkin et al.
patent: 2009/0012869 (2009-01-01), Henkin et al.
patent: 2009/0031311 (2009-01-01), Chang et al.
patent: 2009/0048978 (2009-02-01), Ginter et al.
patent: 2009/0164949 (2009-06-01), Henkin et al.
patent: 2009/0254971 (2009-10-01), Herz et al.
patent: 1030247 (2000-08-01), None
patent: WO 9955066 (1999-10-01), None
patent: WO-0219175 (2002-03-01), None
patent: WO 2005/003920 (2005-01-01), None
patent: WO-2007123783 (2007-11-01), None
patent: WO-2007123783 (2007-11-01), None
Mei Kobayashi et al., “Information Retrieval on the Web”, ACM, Jun. 2000, pp. 144-173.
Jim Challenger et al., “A scalable and highly available system for serving dynamic data at frequently accessed web sites”, ACM, Nov. 1998, pp. 1-30.
Lemay, Laura, “Teach Yourself Web Publishing with HTML 4 in 14 Days”, © 1997 by Sams.net Publishing, Second Professional Reference Edition, pp. 637-651.
Office Action mailed May 11, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 10/977,352, Henkin et al., filed Oct. 28, 2004.
Notice of Allowance mailed on Jul. 25, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/943,524.
Office Action, mailed Aug. 23, 2001, U.S. Appl. No. 09/943,524, Henkin et al., filed Aug. 29, 2001.
Office Action, mailed May 13, 2005, U.S. Appl. No. 09/943,524, Henkin et al. filed Aug. 29, 2001.
Office Action, mailed May 2, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 09/943,524, Henkin et al., filed Aug. 29, 2001.
Office Action, mailed Nov. 21, 2005, U.S. Appl. No. 09/943,524, Henkin et al., filed Aug. 29, 2001.
U.S. Final Office Action mailed Feb. 5, 2008, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/977,352, Henkin et al., filed Oct. 28, 2004.
Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 29, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/977,352.
Allowed Claims for U.S. Appl. No. 10/977,352.
U.S. Office Action mailed Oct. 15, 2007, for U.S. Appl. No. 09/943,571, Henkin et al., filed Aug. 29, 2001.
Notice of Allowance mailed on Aug. 21, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/943,571, filed Aug. 29, 2001.
Allowed Claims for U.S. Appl. No. 09/943,571, filed Aug. 29, 2001.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US07/08042 dated Sep. 19, 2008.
Response to Examiner's Provisional Obviousness-Type Double Patenting Rejection filed on Aug. 12, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/943,571.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/943,524, Amendment A filed Jan. 18, 2005”, 17 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/943,524, Amendment B filed Aug. 10, 2005”, 16 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/943,524, Amendment C filed Feb. 14, 2006”, 22 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/943,524, Amendment D filed Aug. 22, 2006”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/043,524, Interview Summary dated Feb. 2, 2006”, 2 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/943,524, Interview Summary dated Oct. 13, 2006”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/943,524, Interview Summary mailed Jan. 19, 2005”, 1 pg.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/943,524, Interview Summary mailed Jul. 7, 2005”, 1 pg.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/943,524, Non-Final Office Action mailed Aug. 23, 2004”, 14 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/943,524, Supplemental Amendment filed Oct. 12, 2006”, 29 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/943,571, Amendment filed Apr. 15, 2008 in response to Non-Final Office Action mailed Oct. 15, 2007”, 23 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/943,571, Interview Summary mailed May 9, 2008”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/943,571, Interview Summary mailed Aug. 11, 2008”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/943,571, Preliminary Amendment filed Mar. 19, 2007”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/943,571, Response to Restriction Requirement, filed Aug. 30, 2007”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/943,571, Restriction Requirement mailed Jan. 25, 2007”, 1 pg.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/977,352, Amendment filed Jul. 25, 2008 to Final Office Action mailed Feb. 5, 2008”. 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/977,352 Amendment filed Nov. 8, 2007 to Non-Final Office Action mailed May 11, 2007”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/977,352, Interview Summary (allowed claims) mailed Sep. 18, 2008”, RE allowed claims, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/881,430, Amendment B fled Nov. 30, 2006”', 23 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/881,430, Final Office Action mailed Feb. 18, 2010”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/881,430, Non-Final Office Action mailed May 29, 2009”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/881,430, Preliminary Amendment (Amendment A) filed Oct. 2, 2007”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No, 11/891,436, Amendment A filed Nov. 26, 2009 to Non-Final Office Action mailed May 27, 2009”, 21 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/891,436, Final Office Action mailed Mar. 19, 2010”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/891,436, Non-Final Office Action mailed May 27, 2009”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/295,854, Preliminary Am

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Dynamic document context mark-up technique implemented over... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Dynamic document context mark-up technique implemented over..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Dynamic document context mark-up technique implemented over... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4217501

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.