Data processing: structural design – modeling – simulation – and em – Emulation – Of instruction
Reexamination Certificate
1999-07-26
2003-05-13
Ingberg, Todd (Department: 2123)
Data processing: structural design, modeling, simulation, and em
Emulation
Of instruction
C703S024000, C703S025000, C712S028000, C712S031000, C712S034000, C712S035000, C712S036000, C712S209000, C712S203000, C712S227000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06564179
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to processors. More particularly, it relates to an efficient system for combining the functions of two types of processors, e.g., both a digital signal processor and a controller.
2. Background of Related Art
As electronic circuitry in general, and telephone systems in particular, become more advanced, design implementations for the various designs typically make use of two separate processors working in conjunction with one another. One of these processors is invariably a Digital Signal Processor (DSP) which is typically responsible for running logic necessary for signal processing and related tasks, and the other is a suitable controller (e.g., a microcontroller) focused on the overall control of the device.
FIG. 5
shows a conventional two-processor device including both a digital signal processor (DSP) and a microcontroller, each having its own program code.
In particular, in
FIG. 5
, a device
200
such as a telephone device (e.g., telephone answering device, etc.) includes both a DSP
202
and a microcontroller
204
. The DSP
202
communicates information to and from the microcontroller
204
via a suitable communication interface
206
, e.g., a serial or parallel communication interface.
DSP program code
210
is stored in memory accessible to the DSP
202
, and microcontroller code
212
is stored in memory accessible to the microcontroller
204
.
A controller in a two-processor system, e.g., the microcontroller
204
, typically runs as a ‘master’ processor of the system, taking care of the control of the peripherals in the device or system
200
. A second processor, often a DSP
202
, runs in a ‘slave’ mode, mastered by the microcontroller
204
. Using communications between the DSP
202
and the microcontroller
204
provided by the communication interface
206
, appropriate signal processing tasks are typically handled by the DSP
202
operating as a slave device, while ‘feature code’ for the system
200
typically runs on the microcontroller
204
operating as a master device.
An example of a suitable microcontroller
204
often used in a two-processor system is the industry standard microcontroller known as the “8051” microcontroller, which is commercially available in various forms from, e.g., lntel™ and Phillips™.
The 8051 microcontroller is, and has been for nearly two decades, popular among the micro-controller solution provider community. As a result, the 8051 is well supported in the industry, having advanced tools available such as assemblers, C compilers, etc. Moreover, code fragments are widely available for the 8051, e.g., from various sources over the Internet.
In many applications such as that depicted in
FIG. 5
, the DSP
202
is the center of operations. However, as pressures for reduced cost and smaller size persist, design solutions tend toward use of only one processor, e.g., toward use of only the DSP
202
. In such applications, control responsibilities of what would otherwise fall within the requirements of the microcontroller
204
in the two-processor solution are left for the DSP
202
alone to handle in the one-processor solution. Moreover, the software code written for the DSP
202
need control peripheral components and run feature code apart from carrying out its more traditional responsibilities typically associated with standard signal processing tasks. Such control tasks, most efficiently handled by a suitable microcontroller but instead implemented on a DSP in a one-processor device, tend to become cumbersome and inefficient when implemented in DSP code.
For instance, the instruction set of a DSP, while optimized to efficiently encode signal processing algorithms, typically requires an excessive amount of code to handle control functions. This is disadvantageous by its very nature, particularly in the case of one-processor solutions wherein code memory space that a programmer can use is at a premium. This is especially true with low end microcontrollers. Moreover, programmers more conversant with DSP code development may find control tasks somewhat “unfamiliar”, and vice versa.
There is thus a need for a more efficient technique and apparatus for combining the functions traditionally accomplished by two types of processors, e.g., a digital signal processor and a controller, such that programmers will program efficiently, and generate code easily and with minimum size requirements will be at a minimum.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the principles of the present invention, a two processor solution using only one processor comprises a host processor, and a run-time emulation module implemented for emulation of an emulated processor different from the host processor, within the host processor. An operating system allows substantially simultaneous operation of a first program written in host processor code to operate in the host processor and a second program written in processor code for the emulated processor, the host processor code being substantially different from the emulated processor code.
A method of implementing two software programs written in different native languages to be operated on a single processor in real time in accordance with another aspect of the present invention comprises providing a digital signal processor, and a run-time emulation module in the digital signal processor to emulate an emulated processor within the digital signal processor. Program code associated with the digital signal processor is stored in a first portion of program memory accessible by the digital signal processor. Program code associated with the emulated processor is stored in a second portion of the program memory. A host line of program code is retrieved and executed for the digital signal processor, and an emulated line of program code is retrieved and executed for the run-time emulation module.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4992934 (1991-02-01), Portanova et al.
patent: 5283900 (1994-02-01), Frankel et al.
patent: 5291614 (1994-03-01), Baker et al.
patent: 5313618 (1994-05-01), Pawloski
patent: 5329471 (1994-07-01), Swoboda et al.
patent: 5438672 (1995-08-01), Dey
patent: 5442789 (1995-08-01), Baker et al.
patent: 5450607 (1995-09-01), Kowalczyk et al.
patent: 5481684 (1996-01-01), Richter et al.
patent: 5481693 (1996-01-01), Blomgren et al.
patent: 5574927 (1996-11-01), Scantlin
patent: 5630153 (1997-05-01), Intrater et al.
patent: 5748468 (1998-05-01), Notenboom et al.
patent: 5761516 (1998-06-01), Rostoker et al.
patent: 5781792 (1998-07-01), Asghar et al.
patent: 5790824 (1998-08-01), Asghar et al.
patent: 5799169 (1998-08-01), Kalapathy
patent: 5819067 (1998-10-01), Lynch
patent: 5872993 (1999-02-01), Brown
patent: 6032247 (2000-02-01), Asghar et al.
patent: 6052773 (2000-04-01), DeHon et al.
patent: 6163764 (2000-12-01), Dulong et al.
patent: 6185522 (2001-02-01), Bakker
patent: 6185628 (2001-02-01), Sands et al.
patent: 6223274 (2001-04-01), Catthoor et al.
patent: 6256725 (2001-07-01), Batten et al.
patent: 6272452 (2001-08-01), Wu et al.
patent: 6308255 (2001-10-01), Gorishek et al.
patent: 6374312 (2002-04-01), Pearce et al.
Martin et al., “A RISC Architecture with Uncompromised Digital Signal Processing and Microcontroller Operation”, IEEE 1998.*
Walsh, “Piccolo—The ARM Architecture for Signal Processiing: an Innovative New Architecture for Unified DSP and Microcontroller Processing”, Proc. ICSPAT96, vol. 1, pp 658-663, 1996.*
Bursky, “Merged Embedded Controller and DSP Designs Simplify Systems”, Electronic Design, Oct. 1997.*
Williams, “DSP applications are attracting the makers of real-time operating systems”, Electronic Design, 1997.*
Lammers, “TeraGen architecture primes single engine for multiple instruction sets”, EE Times, Jan. 1999.*
Lucent Technologies Inc., “Flash DSP 1650 Digital Signal Processor,” Preliminary Data Sheet, Jan. 1998.
Agere Systems Inc.
Bollman William H.
Ingberg Todd
Thomson W. D.
LandOfFree
DSP emulating a microcontroller does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with DSP emulating a microcontroller, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and DSP emulating a microcontroller will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3073696