Dry paint transfer-laminated body panels having deep-draw high D

Stock material or miscellaneous articles – Vehicle body ornament

Patent

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

428402, 428421, B60R 1300

Patent

active

059166436

ABSTRACT:
A shaped exterior automotive body part having a contoured decorative outer surface, comprising a supporting substrate sheet and a decorative transfer film bonded to one side of said substrate sheet and conforming to said contoured surface, said decorative transfer film having a clear coat/color coat exterior automotive paint film comprising a flexible outer clear coat layer having a glossy, smooth outer surface, the clear coat layer formed of an optically clear, thermoplastic and thermoformable weatherable polymeric material, and a pigmented color coat of automotive quality paint adhered to an inner surface of said outer clear coat layer, the color coat formed of a thermoplastic and thermoformable polymeric material with pigments distributed therein to provide a layer of color visible to the outer surface of the automotive body part; said supporting substrate sheet comprising a continuous and self-supporting thermoformable polymeric material having contoured surface regions formed by having thermoformed the composite of the substrate sheet and the clear coat/color coat paint film to a finished deep-draw contoured shape of the body part, the decorative transfer film having regions thereof which have been subjected to elongation greater than about 50% during such thermoforming for conforming to said contoured regions of the substrate sheet to provide the outer component of a finished glossy contoured body part having an exterior automotive quality paint finish, including a distinctness-of-image value of at least 60 quantified by instrument measurement of said value.

REFERENCES:
patent: 2159693 (1939-05-01), Gaylord, Jr.
patent: 2977639 (1961-04-01), Barkhuff, Jr. et al.
patent: 3057018 (1962-10-01), Lawrence et al.
patent: 3253060 (1966-05-01), Koblitz et al.
patent: 3458391 (1969-07-01), Miller, Jr.
patent: 3459834 (1969-08-01), Schmitt
patent: 3493257 (1970-02-01), Ftizgerald et al.
patent: 3524906 (1970-08-01), Schmitt et al.
patent: 3654062 (1979-04-01), Loew
patent: 3679510 (1972-07-01), Conley et al.
patent: 3880690 (1975-04-01), Fuchs et al.
patent: 3949139 (1976-04-01), Dunning et al.
patent: 4101698 (1978-07-01), Dunning et al.
patent: 4208465 (1980-06-01), Chang
patent: 4235949 (1980-11-01), Van Manen et al.
patent: 4248762 (1981-02-01), Hornibrook et al.
patent: 4263077 (1981-04-01), Rampelberg
patent: 4275099 (1981-06-01), Dani
patent: 4307058 (1981-12-01), Morello et al.
patent: 4314004 (1982-02-01), Stoneberg
patent: 4317860 (1982-03-01), Strassel
patent: 4349592 (1982-09-01), Nussbaum
patent: 4359504 (1982-11-01), Troy
patent: 4364886 (1982-12-01), Strassel
patent: 4369157 (1983-01-01), Conner
patent: 4396680 (1983-08-01), Chang
patent: 4403004 (1983-09-01), Parker et al.
patent: 4415519 (1983-11-01), Strassel
patent: 4451522 (1984-05-01), deVroom
patent: 4451597 (1984-05-01), Victorius
patent: 4474845 (1984-10-01), Hagerman et al.
patent: 4499151 (1985-02-01), Dowbenko et al.
patent: 4515649 (1985-05-01), Nussbaum
patent: 4578426 (1986-03-01), Lenz et al.
patent: 4585701 (1986-04-01), Bartoszek et al.
patent: 4595551 (1986-06-01), Maurer
patent: 4605596 (1986-08-01), Fry
patent: 4639341 (1987-01-01), Hanamoto et al.
patent: 4643789 (1987-02-01), Parker et al.
patent: 4769100 (1988-09-01), Short et al.
patent: 4810540 (1989-03-01), Ellison et al.
patent: 4818589 (1989-04-01), Johnson et al.
patent: 4828637 (1989-05-01), Mentzer et al.
patent: 4838973 (1989-06-01), Mentzer et al.
patent: 4868030 (1989-09-01), Mentzer et al.
patent: 4902557 (1990-02-01), Rohrbacher
patent: 4931324 (1990-06-01), Ellison et al.
patent: 5114789 (1992-05-01), Reafler
patent: 5342666 (1994-08-01), Ellison et al.
Japanese Opposition by Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. against Japanes Patent Application No. 63-504355 and attached exhibits.
Japanese Opposition by Rexham Industries Corp. against Japanese Patent Application No. 63-504355 and attached exhibits.
Japanese Opposition by Nissha Printing Co., Ltd. against Japanese Patent Application No. 63-504355 and attached exhibits.
Fuchs, SME Technical Paper No., FC 77-647, "A State of the Art--Evaluation of Hot Stamping Decorative Plastic," dated 1977*.
Polymers Paint Colour Journal, Oct. 29, 1980, p.796. "The Orientation of Aluminum Pigments in Automotive Finishes," Toyo Auminum K.K.*.
"Brilliant Performance," Rexham Corporation, dated 1987*.
Plastics Engineering, "Solvent Cast Films," May 1987, pp. 29-33*.
Affidavit of Dennis Northorp.
Affidavit of Victor H. Rampelberg and supporting exhibits.
Anonymous, "Research Disclosure," Jul. 1984.
Ullmann, et al., "Composites, Science and Technology," 1985, pp. 97-112.
BP&R, Nov. 1985, pp. 29-30.
Chemical Week, Jul. 4, 1984, p. 30. "Automotive Coatings: Helping Detroit Woo Customers."
Plastics Engineering, "Solvent Cast Films," May 1987. pp. 29-33.
In the United States District Court, for the Western District of North Carolina, Rexam Industries v. Avery Dennison, Civil Action 3:94cv271-McK (1) Rexam's Motion No. 1 for Partial Summary Judgment Against Avery.
(2) "Memorandum of Law in Support of Rexam's Motion No. 1 for Partial Summary Judgment Against Avery".
(3) "Rexam's Motion No. 2 for Partial Summary Judgment Against Avery".
(4) "Memorandum of Law in Support of Rexam's Motion No. 2 for Partial Summary Judgment Against Avery".
(5) "Rexam's Motion No. 3 for Partial Summary Judgment Against Avery".
(6) "Memorandum of Law in Support of Rexam's Motion No. 3 for Partial Summary Judgment Against Avery".
(7) Joint Appendix Supporting Rexam's Motion Nos. 1, 2 and 3 for Partial Summary Judgment Against Avery (vol. 1 of II).
(8) Joint Appendix Supporting Rexam's Motion Nos. 1, 2 and 3 for Partial Summary Judgment Against Avery (vol. II of II).
(9) "Avery's Statement of Disputed Facts in Support of Avery's Oppositions to Rexam's Motions 1 and 2".
(10) "Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Rexam's Motion No. 1 for Partial Summary Judgment Against Avery".
(11) "Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Rexam's Motion No. 2 for Partial Summary Judgment Against Avery".
(12) "Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Rexam's Motion No. 3 for Partial Summary Judgment Against Avery".
(13) "Avery's Appendix of Documents in Opposition to Rexam's Summary Judgment Motions".
(14) "Rexam's Reply in Support of Its Motion No. 1 For Partial Summary Judgment Against Avery".
(15) "Rexam's Reply in Support of Its Motion No. 2 For Partial Summary Judgment Against Avery".
(16) "Rexam's Reply in Support Its Motion No. 3 For Partial Summary Judgment Against Avery".
(17) "Supplemental Joint Appendix Supporting Rexam's Motion No. 1, 2 and 3 For Partial Summary Judgment Against Avery".

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Dry paint transfer-laminated body panels having deep-draw high D does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Dry paint transfer-laminated body panels having deep-draw high D, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Dry paint transfer-laminated body panels having deep-draw high D will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-1374170

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.