Interrelated power delivery controls – including engine control – Plural engines – Electric engine
Reexamination Certificate
2000-11-16
2003-07-08
Bonck, Rodney H. (Department: 3681)
Interrelated power delivery controls, including engine control
Plural engines
Electric engine
C475S005000, C180S065230
Reexamination Certificate
active
06589130
ABSTRACT:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
Not Applicable
STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH
Not Applicable
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Combustion engine driven industrial trucks require a transmission to provide the desired torque at the desired speed. It is known to use a change-speed mechanism including a clutch for this purpose. However, such a system is unacceptable for industrial trucks. Therefore, it is also known in driving systems to provide hydrodynamic transducers in combination with single-step transmissions and multi-step transmissions. This solution proves disadvantageous at slow driving speeds because efficiency is not good in this operating condition. Furthermore, a clutch function is required to independently operate the lifting function.
The disadvantages of the hydrodynamic solution are not encountered in a hydrostatic driving branch. However, what opposes the relatively high efficiency when driving at a slow speed is the bad efficiency at faster driving speeds. Another drawback is the relatively large construction expenditure due to the high hydraulic pressures up to 400 bar and the system's susceptibility to defects, particularly with regard to leakage.
Finally, in the industrial truck field, it is also known to perform the transmission of forces by means of an electric transmission. In an electric transmission, all the energy generated by the combustion engine is converted into electric energy by means of a generator. Then, this electric energy is reconverted into mechanical energy by means of an electric motor. The drive controls for electric motors are capable of adjusting any gear ratios between the generator and the electric motor. Hence, a system of this type has the advantage of being regulable particularly well. A drawback, however, are the low efficiencies due to the high losses in the controls and electric machines.
The existing solutions in driving combustion engine operated industrial trucks, as a rule, involve considerable energy losses in certain operating situations. Furthermore, the existing systems are incapable of returning energy in braking. Furthermore, emissionless operation is impossible, which nearly rules out the use of such industrial trucks in closed rooms. Another disadvantage of the former driving systems lies in the fact that the components of the systems require to be designed for peak loads. The mean load acting on the components, however, clearly is below such values. Thus, a large construction expenditure is incurred that is not needed for the mean.
DE 198 03 160 has made known a two-branch driving system for automobiles which is intended to better meet the requirements to power-driven vehicles in a stop-and-go operation in conurbations. The known system is a so-called hybrid drive with a first electric machine disposed on a driving shaft of the hybrid drive and a second electric machine the two of which are always operable as a generator and an electric motor and which are coupled to each other and to the combustion engine via a two-branch gear transmission. The second electric machine is positioned on a shaft with which a rotary brake is associated which is controllable in dependence on the driving condition of the power-driven vehicle and by which the respective shaft can be located. It is by means of such a driving system that a more favourable efficiency behaviour of power-driven vehicles and a long service life of the drive are intended to be ensured.
DE 197 47 459 has made known a two-branch driving system for tractors and agricultural machinery which has a mechanical drive and an adjustable hydrostatic transmission. This driving system is intended to increase efficiency via the mechanical branch. In addition, a driving system of this type may obtain a higher speed as compared to simple hydrostatic driving systems. The known driving system, as a rule, does not need the same forward movement and reverse movement speed as is the case in industrial trucks. The earlier described hydrid driving system does not make it possible either to reverse at a maximum speed.
It is the object of the invention to provide a driving system for industrial trucks that enables a large range of speed adjustability at a uniformly good efficiency and does not limit the manoeuvrability of the vehicle. In addition, one embodiment is also intended to make possible emissionless operation in closed rooms at least temporarily.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The inventive driving system for industrial trucks provides a two-branch system wherein the primary branch provides a mechanical no-clutch connection between the combustion engine and a gear assembly whereas an electric motor is coupled with no clutch to the gear assembly in a secondary branch.
In another aspect of the invention, if necessary, a gear ratio transmission may be provided which approximately is incorporated into the combustion engine branch. It may be designed as a transmission with a fixed gear ratio, a adjustable transmission or a change-speed transmission. The second or secondary driving branch has a battery, a drive control, and an electric motor. The two driving branches are led to combine in a gear assembly. The gear assembly may be a differential or planetary mechanism.
For a reversal of the direction of travel, it may be opportune to integrate a change-over transmission in the driving system. Such a change-over transmission, however, may also be unnecessary because the direction of travel can be changed by reversing the sense of rotation of the electric motor.
Preferably, a governor is provided in order to provide a speed regulation according to a desired-value signal. The governor controls the electric motor, the combustion engine, and any brakes that might exist. The desired-value transmitter actuated by the vehicle operator produces a desired speed value which, for a regulation of the drive, is compared to the respective actual value. By actuating the desired-value transmitter or another appropriate operating device (e.g. a switch for the direction of travel or a dual pedal), the vehicle driver informs the governor in which direction and at which speed he wishes to drive. If the vehicle is at stoppage at this point the change-over transmission either is shifted to the gear ratio belonging to the desired direction of travel following an actuation of the operating device or the driving behaviour is imparted to the electric motor by an appropriate signal. Shifting the change-over transmission preferably is not done directly by the driver, but the governor in dependence on the actual state of travel and the position of the operating device. This ensures that the change-over transmission is shifted only if the input and output shafts are at stoppage or at least at an approximate stoppage (with the designation “input and output shafts” referring to the change-over transmission rather than to the driving system here). This permits to dispense with a mechanism for synchronizing the numbers of revolutions and, moreover, no shocks will occur and no wear will result owing to the shifting operation. If the direction of travel is reversed by the electric motor there will no problems whatsoever in this respect.
In the inventive driving system, if the vehicle is intended to be stopped, but the combustion engine has been started by means of the electric motor and is rotating at an idle speed the electric motor has to rotate at the same speed as the combustion engine, but in an inverse sense. For a start-up, the electric motor is braked in a counterclockwise sense of rotation. Thus, energy is generated which can be fed to the battery. An appropriate connection requires to be provided to this end. If the vehicle is sped up further the electric motor may also drive the vehicle actively. At this point, energy requires to be drawn from the battery. In the invention, the vehicle may also be driven exclusively by electricity, for example, in order not to emit any exhaust gases in roof-covered rooms. Conversely, the vehicle may also be driven exclusively by a combustion motor.
F
Baginski Ralf
Bruns Rainer
Jungheinrich Aktiengesellschaft
Le David D.
Vidas Arrett & Steinkraus P.A.
LandOfFree
Driving system for industrial trucks does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Driving system for industrial trucks, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Driving system for industrial trucks will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3013707